30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Our capacity to jointly represent information about the world underpins our social experience. By leveraging one individual’s brain activity to model another’s, we can measure shared information across brains—even in dynamic, naturalistic scenarios where an explicit response model may be unobtainable. Introducing experimental manipulations allows us to measure, for example, shared responses between speakers and listeners or between perception and recall. In this tutorial, we develop the logic of intersubject correlation (ISC) analysis and discuss the family of neuroscientific questions that stem from this approach. We also extend this logic to spatially distributed response patterns and functional network estimation. We provide a thorough and accessible treatment of methodological considerations specific to ISC analysis and outline best practices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects.

            One of the most robust experience-related cortical dynamics is reduced neural activity when stimuli are repeated. This reduction has been linked to performance improvements due to repetition and also used to probe functional characteristics of neural populations. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are as yet unknown. Here, we consider three models that have been proposed to account for repetition-related reductions in neural activity, and evaluate them in terms of their ability to account for the main properties of this phenomenon as measured with single-cell recordings and neuroimaging techniques. We also discuss future directions for distinguishing between these models, which will be important for understanding the neural consequences of repetition and for interpreting repetition-related effects in neuroimaging data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Information-based functional brain mapping.

              The development of high-resolution neuroimaging and multielectrode electrophysiological recording provides neuroscientists with huge amounts of multivariate data. The complexity of the data creates a need for statistical summary, but the local averaging standardly applied to this end may obscure the effects of greatest neuroscientific interest. In neuroimaging, for example, brain mapping analysis has focused on the discovery of activation, i.e., of extended brain regions whose average activity changes across experimental conditions. Here we propose to ask a more general question of the data: Where in the brain does the activity pattern contain information about the experimental condition? To address this question, we propose scanning the imaged volume with a "searchlight," whose contents are analyzed multivariately at each location in the brain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci
                Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci
                scan
                Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
                Oxford University Press
                1749-5016
                1749-5024
                June 2019
                16 May 2019
                16 May 2019
                : 14
                : 6
                : 667-685
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
                [2 ]Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAW, 105BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to Samuel Nastase, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. E-mail: sam.nastase@ 123456gmail.com .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-5275
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0324-0619
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-7168
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2845-5467
                Article
                nsz037
                10.1093/scan/nsz037
                6688448
                31099394
                5cada06f-7025-4469-9d44-de250a1f17ad
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 March 2019
                : 10 May 2019
                : 13 May 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: European Research Council 10.13039/100010663
                Award ID: ERC-StG-312511
                Funded by: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
                Award ID: VIDI 452-14-015
                Award ID: VICI: 453-15-009
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R01 MH112566-01
                Categories
                Editorial

                Neurosciences
                communication,fmri,naturalistic stimuli,reliability,social cognition
                Neurosciences
                communication, fmri, naturalistic stimuli, reliability, social cognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article