2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Changes in Life Expectancy Between 2019 and 2020 in the US and 21 Peer Countries

      research-article
      , MD, MPH 1 , , , PhD 2 , , MA 3
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study examines death counts in the US and 21 peer countries between 2019 and 2020 to evaluate life expectancy disparities between the US and peer countries and racial disparities within the US.

          Key Points

          Question

          How did US life expectancy change between 2019 and 2020, and how did that compare with changes in life expectancy in 21 other high-income countries?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional study, calculations of life expectancy based on official death counts revealed that US life expectancy decreased by 1.87 years overall, and by 3.70 years in Hispanic populations and 3.22 years in non-Hispanic Black populations. The decrease in life expectancy in peer countries was a mean of 0.58 years, with no country experiencing a decrease rivaling that of the US.

          Meaning

          The large and highly racialized decreases in US life expectancy underscore the growing US health disadvantage relative to peer countries and the need for policies that prioritize health and equity.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Prior studies reported that US life expectancy decreased considerably in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, with estimates suggesting that the decreases were much larger among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black populations than non-Hispanic White populations. Studies based on provisional data suggested that other high-income countries did not experience the large decrease in life expectancy observed in the US; this study sought to confirm these findings according to official death counts and to broaden the pool of comparison countries.

          Objective

          To calculate changes in US life expectancy between 2019 and 2020 by sex, race, and ethnicity and to compare those outcomes with changes in other high-income countries.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study involved a simulation of life tables based on national death and population counts for the US and 21 other high-income countries in 2019 and 2020, by sex, including an analysis of US outcomes by race and ethnicity. Data were analyzed in January 2022.

          Exposures

          Official death counts from the US and 21 peer countries.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Life expectancy at birth and credible range (CR) based on 10% uncertainty.

          Results

          Between 2019 and 2020, US life expectancy decreased by a mean of 1.87 years (CR, 1.70-2.03 years), with much larger decreases occurring in the Hispanic (3.70 years; CR, 3.53-3.87 years) and non-Hispanic Black (3.22 years; CR, 3.03-3.40 years) populations than in the non-Hispanic White population (1.38 years; CR, 1.21-1.54 years). The mean decrease in life expectancy among peer countries was 0.58 years (CR, 0.42-0.73 year) across all 21 countries. No peer country experienced decreases as large as those seen in the US.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Official death counts confirm that US life expectancy decreased between 2019 and 2020 on a scale not seen in 21 peer countries, substantially widening the preexisting gap in life expectancy between the US and peer countries. The decrease in US life expectancy was experienced disproportionately by Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black populations, consistent with a larger history of racial and ethnic health inequities resulting from policies of exclusion and systemic racism. Policies to address the systemic causes of the US health disadvantage relative to peer countries and persistent racial and ethnic inequities are essential.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions

          The Lancet, 389(10077), 1453-1463
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Racism and Health: Evidence and Needed Research

            In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scientific research examining the multiple ways in which racism can adversely affect health. This interest has been driven in part by the striking persistence of racial/ethnic inequities in health and the empirical evidence that indicates that socioeconomic factors alone do not account for racial/ethnic inequities in health. Racism is considered a fundamental cause of adverse health outcomes for racial/ethnic minorities and racial/ethnic inequities in health. This article provides an overview of the evidence linking the primary domains of racism—structural racism, cultural racism, and individual-level discrimination—to mental and physical health outcomes. For each mechanism, we describe key findings and identify priorities for future research. We also discuss evidence for interventions to reduce racism and describe research needed to advance knowledge in this area.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Related to COVID-19

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                13 April 2022
                April 2022
                13 April 2022
                : 5
                : 4
                : e227067
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center on Society and Health, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond
                [2 ]Department of Sociology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder
                [3 ]Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 24, 2022.
                Published: April 13, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7067
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Woolf SH et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH, Center on Society and Health, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 830 E Main St, Ste 5035, Richmond, VA 23298-0212 ( steven.woolf@ 123456vcuhealth.org ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Woolf and Masters had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: All authors.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Woolf, Masters.
                Statistical analysis: Masters.
                Supervision: Woolf, Aron.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: Dr Woolf received partial funding from grant UL1TR002649 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Dr Masters received support from the University of Colorado Population Center grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver Institute of Child Health and Human Development (CUPC project 2P2CHD066613-06). There was no specific funding for this study.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi220224
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7067
                9008499
                35416991
                5c8b14f6-5f7b-48ed-92d1-8f0af06ae93e
                Copyright 2022 Woolf SH et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 5 December 2021
                : 24 February 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Public Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article