27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results Translated title: Robotische Hernienchirurgie Teil IV : Roboterassistierte endoskopische parastomale Hernienversorgung. Videobericht und Ergebnisse

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of a funnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing a comprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.

          Video online

          The online version of this article contains 4 videos. The article and the videos are online available (10.1007/s00104-022-01779-5). The videos can be found in the article back matter as “Electronic Supplementary Material”.

          Translated abstract

          Die chirurgische Behandlung parastomaler Hernien gilt als komplex und ist bekanntermaßen komplikationsträchtig. In der Vergangenheit wurden diese Hernien durch die Relokation des Stomas oder Nahtverfahren der Austrittstelle versorgt. In den letzten Jahren wurden verschiedene netzbasierte Techniken vorgeschlagen, die heute in der minimal-invasiven Chirurgie eingesetzt werden. Mit der Verbreitung der roboterassistierten Hernienchirurgie wurden die Netzverfahren weiterentwickelt und die Ergebnisse für die Patienten erheblich verbessert. In diesem Beitrag wird ein Überblick über die verfügbaren Techniken der roboterassistierten Versorgung parastomaler Hernien präsentiert. Es werden technische Überlegungen und erste Ergebnisse des roboterassistierten modifizierten Sugarbaker-Verfahrens, der roboterassistierten Pauli-Technik und der Verwendung des trichterförmigen Netzes IPST vorgestellt. Darüber hinaus werden die Herausforderungen bei der roboterassistierten Versorgung parastomaler Hernien am Ileum-Conduit diskutiert. Die Operationstechniken werden durch Foto- und Videomaterial veranschaulicht.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.

          International guidelines on the prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias are lacking. The European Hernia Society therefore implemented a Clinical Practice Guideline development project.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.

            Parastomal hernias are a frequent complication of enterostomies that require surgical treatment in approximately half of patients. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of the surgical techniques available for parastomal hernia repair. Systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA. Assessment of methodological quality and selection of studies of parastomal hernia repair was done with a modified MINORS. Subgroups were formed for each surgical technique. Primary outcome was recurrence after at least 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative morbidity. Outcomes were analyzed using weighted pooled proportions and logistic regression. Thirty studies were included with the majority retrospective. Suture repair resulted in a significantly increased recurrence rate when compared with mesh repair (odds ratio [OR] 8.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-15.1; P < 0.0001). Recurrence rates for mesh repair ranged from 6.9% to 17% and did not differ significantly. In the laparoscopic repair group, the Sugarbaker technique had less recurrences than the keyhole technique (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.6; P = 0.016). Morbidity did not differ between techniques. The overall rate of mesh infections was low (3%, 95% CI 2) and comparable for each type of mesh repair. Suture repair of parastomal hernia should be abandoned because of increased recurrence rates. The use of mesh in parastomal hernia repair significantly reduces recurrence rates and is safe with a low overall rate of mesh infection. In laparoscopic repair, the Sugarbaker technique is superior over the keyhole technique showing fewer recurrences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ostomy-related problems and their impact on quality of life of colorectal cancer ostomates: a systematic review

              Aim Many long-term ostomates are ‘out-of-sight’ of healthcare, and it is unknown how ostomates deal with ostomy-related problems and how these problems affect their quality of life (QOL). The aim is to examine patient-related studies describing ostomy-related problems and their impact on the perceived QOL of long-term colostomates. Methods The electronic databases PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO were systematically searched. All studies were included in which ostomy-specific QOL was measured using validated multidimensional instruments. Results Of the 6447 citations identified, 14 prevailingly descriptive cross-sectional studies were included. Three different validated multidimensional instruments for measuring QOL in ostomates were used (EORTC C30/CR38, MCOHQOLQO, Stoma QOL Questionnaire). All studies demonstrated that living with a colostomy influences the overall QOL negatively. The ostomy-related problems described included sexual problems, depressive feelings, gas, constipation, dissatisfaction with appearance, change in clothing, travel difficulties, feeling tired and worry about noises. Conclusion In conclusion, all 14 studies gave an indication of the impact of ostomy-related problems on the perceived QOL and demonstrated that a colostomy influences the QOL negatively. There is a wide range of ostomy-specific QOL scores, and there seem to be higher QOL scores in the studies where the MCOHQOLQO instrument was used. The MCOHQOLQO and the Stoma QOL Questionnaire gave the most detailed information about which ostomy-related problems were experienced. This review adds knowledge about the impact of stoma-related problems on QOL of long-term ostomates, but more research has to be conducted, to detect ostomy-related problems and especially possible care needs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1050-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                wiegering_a@ukw.de
                Filip.muysoms@azmmsj.be
                Journal
                Chirurgie (Heidelb)
                Chirurgie (Heidelb)
                Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)
                Springer Medizin (Heidelberg )
                2731-6971
                2731-698X
                8 December 2022
                8 December 2022
                2022
                : 93
                : Suppl 2
                : 129-140
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412966.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, Department of Surgery, , Maastricht University Medical Center, ; Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.410567.1, Department of Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, , Cantonal Hospital Olten, ; Olten, Switzerland
                [3 ]GRID grid.411843.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0623 9987, Department of Surgery, , Skane University Hospital, ; Malmö, Sweden
                [4 ]GRID grid.240473.6, ISNI 0000 0004 0543 9901, Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric, , PennState Hershey Medical Center, ; Hershey, PA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.239494.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9553 6721, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, , Carolinas Medical Center, ; Charlotte, NC USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.412929.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0627 386X, Department of Surgery, , Sykehuset Innlandet Hospital Trust, ; Brumunddal, Norway
                [7 ]Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
                [8 ]GRID grid.413349.8, ISNI 0000 0001 2294 4705, Department of Urology, , Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, ; St. Gallen, Switzerland
                [9 ]GRID grid.411760.5, ISNI 0000 0001 1378 7891, Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, , University Hospital Wuerzburg, ; Oberduer. Str. 6, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
                [10 ]GRID grid.420034.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0612 8849, Department of Surgery, , Maria Middelares Hospital, ; Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                Article
                1779
                10.1007/s00104-022-01779-5
                9747841
                36480037
                5b137dda-3648-45d7-a978-16e841d51d7a
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 6 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (8913)
                Categories
                Video plus
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022

                parastomal hernia,ileal conduit,pauli procedure,funnel mesh (ipst),modified sugarbaker technique,parastomale hernie,ileum-conduit,pauli-verfahren,trichternetz (ipst),modifizierte sugarbaker-technik

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content180

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors349