8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between maternally perceived quality and pattern of fetal movements and late stillbirth

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigated fetal movement quality and pattern and association with late stillbirth in this multicentre case-control study. Cases (n = 164) had experienced a non-anomalous singleton late stillbirth. Controls (n = 569) were at a similar gestation with non-anomalous singleton ongoing pregnancy. Data on perceived fetal movements were collected via interviewer-administered questionnaire. We compared categorical fetal movement variables between cases and controls using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for possible confounders. In multivariable analysis, maternal perception of the following fetal movement variables was associated with decreased risk of late stillbirth; multiple instances of ‘more vigorous than usual’ fetal movement (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32–0.82), daily perception of fetal hiccups (aOR 0.28, 95%CI 0.15–0.52), and perception of increased length of fetal movement clusters or ‘busy times’ (aOR 0.23, 95%CI 0.11–0.47). Conversely, the following maternally perceived fetal movement variables were associated with increased risk of late stillbirth; decreased frequency of fetal movements (aOR 2.29, 95%CI 1.31–4.0), and perception of ‘quiet or light’ fetal movement in the evening (aOR 3.82, 95%CI 1.57–9.31). In conclusion, women with stillbirth were more likely than controls to have experienced alterations in fetal movement, including decreased strength, frequency and in particular a fetus that was ‘quiet’ in the evening.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The emergence of fetal behaviour. I. Qualitative aspects.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial

            Summary Background 2·6 million pregnancies were estimated to have ended in stillbirth in 2015. The aim of the AFFIRM study was to test the hypothesis that introduction of a reduced fetal movement (RFM), care package for pregnant women and clinicians that increased women's awareness of the need for prompt reporting of RFM and that standardised management, including timely delivery, would alter the incidence of stillbirth. Methods This stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial was done in the UK and Ireland. Participating maternity hospitals were grouped and randomised, using a computer-generated allocation scheme, to one of nine intervention implementation dates (at 3 month intervals). This date was concealed from clusters and the trial team until 3 months before the implementation date. Each participating hospital had three observation periods: a control period from Jan 1, 2014, until randomised date of intervention initiation; a washout period from the implementation date and for 2 months; and the intervention period from the end of the washout period until Dec 31, 2016. Treatment allocation was not concealed from participating women and caregivers. Data were derived from observational maternity data. The primary outcome was incidence of stillbirth. The primary analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle, with births analysed according to whether they took place during the control or intervention periods, irrespective of whether the intervention had been implemented as planned. This study is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01777022. Findings 37 hospitals were enrolled in the study. Four hospitals declined participation, and 33 hospitals were randomly assigned to an intervention implementation date. Between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec, 31, 2016, data were collected from 409 175 pregnancies (157 692 deliveries during the control period, 23 623 deliveries in the washout period, and 227 860 deliveries in the intervention period). The incidence of stillbirth was 4·40 per 1000 births during the control period and 4·06 per 1000 births in the intervention period (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·75–1·07; p=0·23). Interpretation The RFM care package did not reduce the risk of stillbirths. The benefits of a policy that promotes awareness of RFM remains unproven. Funding Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government (CZH/4/882), Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, Sands.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement

              Background Women experiencing decreased fetal movements (DFM) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Fourteen delivery units in Norway registered all cases of DFM in a population-based quality assessment. We found that information to women and management of DFM varied significantly between hospitals. We intended to examine two cohorts of women with DFM before and during two consensus-based interventions aiming to improve care through: 1) written information to women about fetal activity and DFM, including an invitation to monitor fetal movements, 2) guidelines for management of DFM for health-care professionals. Methods All singleton third trimester pregnancies presenting with a perception of DFM were registered, and outcomes collected independently at all 14 hospitals. The quality assessment period included April 2005 through October 2005, and the two interventions were implemented from November 2005 through March 2007. The baseline versus intervention cohorts included: 19,407 versus 46,143 births and 1215 versus 3038 women with DFM, respectively. Results Reports of DFM did not increase during the intervention. The stillbirth rate among women with DFM fell during the intervention: 4.2% vs. 2.4%, (OR 0.51 95% CI 0.32–0.81), and 3.0/1000 versus 2.0/1000 in the overall study population (OR 0.67 95% CI 0.48–0.93). There was no increase in the rates of preterm births, fetal growth restriction, transfers to neonatal care or severe neonatal depression among women with DFM during the intervention. The use of ultrasound in management increased, while additional follow up visits and admissions for induction were reduced. Conclusion Improved management of DFM and uniform information to women is associated with fewer stillbirths.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                b.bradford@auckland.ac.nz
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                8 July 2019
                8 July 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 9815
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, GRID grid.9654.e, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, , University of Auckland, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, GRID grid.9654.e, Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, , University of Auckland, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, GRID grid.9654.e, Liggins Institute, , University of Auckland, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [4 ]Kidz First Neonatal Care, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-7459
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-7873
                Article
                46323
                10.1038/s41598-019-46323-4
                6614481
                31285538
                59c281bc-4c3f-4d1d-b694-3d7aa26083df
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 1 April 2019
                : 25 June 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001505, Manatu Hauora | Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC);
                Award ID: 12/372
                Award ID: 12/372
                Award ID: 12/372
                Award ID: 12/372
                Award ID: 12/372
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001515, Cure Kids (CK);
                Award ID: 5357
                Award ID: 5357
                Award ID: 5357
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100008315, Nurture Foundation for Reproductive Research;
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100006346, University of Auckland | Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland (FMHS);
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Uncategorized
                epidemiology,patient education
                Uncategorized
                epidemiology, patient education

                Comments

                Comment on this article