4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to this journal, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving mental ill-health with psycho-social group interventions in South Asia–A scoping review using a realist lens

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This scoping review aimed to synthesise current evidence related to psycho-social groups as part of community-based mental health interventions in South Asia. We used a realist lens to pay attention to the contexts and mechanisms supporting positive outcomes. We included studies published from January 2007 to February 2022 that: were based in communities in South Asia, included a group component, reported on interventions with a clear psychosocial component, targeted adults and were implemented by lay community health workers. Two reviewers extracted data on intervention components, groups and facilitators, participant demographics and enabling contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Expert reference panels including people with lived experience of psycho-social disability, mental health professionals and policy makers confirmed the validity and relevance of initial review findings. The review examined 15 interventions represented by 42 papers. Only four interventions were solely psycho-social and nearly all included psychoeducation and economic support. Only 8 of the 46 quantitative outcome measures used were developed in South Asia. In a context of social exclusion and limited autonomy for people with psychosocial disability, psychosocial support groups triggered five key mechanisms. Trusted relationships undergirded all mechanisms, and provided a sense of inclusion, social support and of being able to manage mental distress due to improved skills and knowledge. Over time group members felt a sense of belonging and collective strength meaning they were better able to advocate for their own well-being and address upstream social health determinants. This led to outcomes of improved mental health and social participation across the realms of intrapersonal, interpersonal and community. Psychosocial groups merit greater attention as an active ingredient in community interventions and also as an effective, relevant, acceptable and scalable platform that can promote and increase mental health in communities, through facilitation by lay community health workers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references119

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

          Background Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process. Discussion We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Summary Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.

            Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the 'scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for 'reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed, or exhibits a complex or heterogeneous nature not amenable to a more precise systematic review of the evidence. While scoping reviews may be conducted to determine the value and probable scope of a full systematic review, they may also be undertaken as exercises in and of themselves to summarize and disseminate research findings, to identify research gaps, and to make recommendations for the future research. This article briefly introduces the reader to scoping reviews, how they are different to systematic reviews, and why they might be conducted. The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the Joanna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development

              The Lancet, 392(10157), 1553-1598
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysis
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLOS Glob Public Health
                PLOS Glob Public Health
                plos
                PLOS Global Public Health
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                2767-3375
                28 August 2023
                2023
                : 3
                : 8
                : e0001736
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Emmanuel Hospital Association, Uttarakhand, India
                [2 ] Faculty of Health, Te Kaupeka Oranga, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [3 ] School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [4 ] Mental Health Social Worker, Exeter, United Kingdom
                [5 ] Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [6 ] Independent Researcher, Leuven, Belgium
                [7 ] Department of Psychiatry, St John’s National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, India
                [8 ] School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego Jozefa Pilsudskego w Warszawie, POLAND
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-9459
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-9657
                Article
                PGPH-D-22-00857
                10.1371/journal.pgph.0001736
                10461838
                37639400
                550dcf47-6366-45f3-8833-bffe6dd9c300
                © 2023 Mathias et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 June 2022
                : 28 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 31
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100016270, Global Challenges Research Fund;
                Award ID: 2018-9
                Award Recipient :
                This study was supported by Global Challenges Research Fund Investment 2018-9 via the University of Edinburgh (SJ, MW and KM). This grant supported the salary of MD. No additional external funding was received for this study. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Psychological and Psychosocial Issues
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Mood Disorders
                Depression
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Asia
                India
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Asia
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Asia
                Pakistan
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Custom metadata
                Data is available on Figshare with the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22123943.

                Comments

                Comment on this article