16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Non-invasive measurement of PD-L1 status and prediction of immunotherapy response using deep learning of PET/CT images

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Currently, only a fraction of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) experience a durable clinical benefit (DCB). According to NCCN guidelines, Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of biopsies is the only clinically approved companion biomarker to trigger the use of ICI therapy. Based on prior work showing a relationship between quantitative imaging and gene expression, we hypothesize that quantitative imaging (radiomics) can provide an alternative surrogate for PD-L1 expression status in clinical decision support.

          Methods

          18F-FDG-PET/CT images and clinical data were curated from 697 patients with NSCLC from three institutions and these were analyzed using a small-residual-convolutional-network (SResCNN) to develop a deeply learned score (DLS) to predict the PD-L1 expression status. This developed model was further used to predict DCB, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in two retrospective and one prospective test cohorts of ICI-treated patients with advanced stage NSCLC.

          Results

          The PD-L1 DLS significantly discriminated between PD-L1 positive and negative patients (area under receiver operating characteristics curve ≥0.82 in the training, validation, and two external test cohorts). Importantly, the DLS was indistinguishable from IHC-derived PD-L1 status in predicting PFS and OS, suggesting the utility of DLS as a surrogate for IHC. A score generated by combining the DLS with clinical characteristics was able to accurately (C-indexes of 0.70–0.87) predict DCB, PFS, and OS in retrospective training, prospective testing and external validation cohorts.

          Conclusion

          Hence, we propose DLS as a surrogate or substitute for IHC-determined PD-L1 measurement to guide individual pretherapy decisions pending in larger prospective trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

              First-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that lacks targetable mutations is platinum-based chemotherapy. Among patients with a tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of 50% or greater, pembrolizumab has replaced cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of choice. The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher rates of response and longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone in a phase 2 trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Immunother Cancer
                J Immunother Cancer
                jitc
                jitc
                Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2051-1426
                2021
                16 June 2021
                : 9
                : 6
                : e002118
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Cancer Physiology , Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida, USA
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Nuclear Medicine , Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , Shanghai, China
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Radiology , Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University , Shenyang, China
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Thoracic Oncology , Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida, USA
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Radiation Oncology , James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Tampa, Florida, USA
                [6 ] departmentBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine , School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University , Beijing, China
                [7 ] departmentInstitute of Automation , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, China
                [8 ] departmentDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology , Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Matthew B Schabath; matthew.schabath@ 123456moffitt.org ; Robert J Gillies; Robert.Gillies@ 123456moffitt.org ; Dr Jie Tian; tian@ 123456ieee.org
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7970-8666
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9479-132X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-3216
                Article
                jitc-2020-002118
                10.1136/jitc-2020-002118
                8211060
                34135101
                538f8f12-ee78-4a7a-b9c4-7a6e0301f88d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 06 May 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007197, U.S. Public Health Service;
                Award ID: R01 CA190105
                Award ID: U01 CA143062
                Categories
                Immunotherapy Biomarkers
                1506
                2437
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                tumor biomarkers,immunotherapy
                tumor biomarkers, immunotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content116

                Cited by74

                Most referenced authors1,354