128
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Bone substitutes: an update.

      1 , ,
      Injury
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Autograft is considered ideal for grafting procedures, providing osteoinductive growth factors, osteogenic cells, and an osteoconductive scaffold. Limitations, however, exist regarding donor site morbidity and graft availability. Allograft on the other hand, posses the risk of disease transmission. Synthetic graft substitutes lack osteoinductive or osteogenic properties. Composite grafts combine scaffolding properties with biological elements to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation and eventually osteogenesis. We present here an overview of bone grafts and graft substitutes available for clinical applications.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Injury
          Injury
          Elsevier BV
          0020-1383
          0020-1383
          Nov 2005
          : 36 Suppl 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Academic Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, St. James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. pgiannoudi@aol.com
          Article
          S0020-1383(05)00287-1
          10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029
          16188545
          4cf92af5-b9f1-431c-b2b4-25884d3102f3
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article