10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lymph node imaging in initial staging of prostate cancer: An overview and update

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accurate nodal staging at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer is crucial in determining a treatment plan for the patient. Pelvic lymph node dissection is the most reliable method, but is less than perfect and has increased morbidity. Cross sectional imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are non-invasive tools that rely on morphologic characteristics such as shape and size of the lymph nodes. However, lymph nodes harboring metastatic disease may be normal sized and non-metastatic lymph nodes may be enlarged due to reactive hyperplasia. The optimal strategy for preoperative staging remains a topic of ongoing research. Advanced imaging techniques to assess lymph nodes in the setting of prostate cancer utilizing novel MRI contrast agents as well as positron emission tomography (PET) tracers have been developed and continue to be studied. Magnetic resonance lymphography utilizing ultra-small super paramagnetic iron oxide has shown promising results in detection of metastatic lymph nodes. Combining MRL with diffusion-weighted imaging may also improve accuracy. Considerable efforts are being made to develop effective PET radiotracers that are performed using hybrid-imaging systems that combine PET with CT or MRI. PET tracers that will be reviewed in this article include [ 18F]fluoro-D-glucose, sodium [ 18F]fluoride, [ 18F]choline, [ 11C]choline, prostate specific membrane antigen binding ligands, [ 11C]acetate, [ 18F]fluciclovine, gastrin releasing peptide receptor ligands, and androgen binding receptors. This article will review these advanced imaging modalities and ability to detect prostate cancer metastasis to lymph nodes. While more research is needed, these novel techniques to image lymph nodes in the setting of prostate cancer show a promising future in improving initial lymph node staging.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          German Multicenter Study Investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients.

          (177)Lu-labeled PSMA-617 is a promising new therapeutic agent for radioligand therapy (RLT) of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Initiated by the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, a retrospective multicenter data analysis was started in 2015 to evaluate efficacy and safety of (177)Lu-PSMA-617 in a large cohort of patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

            To compare the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. After a comprehensive literature search, studies were included that allowed construction of contingency tables for detection of lymph node metastases using CT or MRI. In addition, a summary receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. A total of 24 studies were included. For CT, pooled sensitivity was 0.42 (0.26-0.56 95% CI) and pooled specificity was 0.82 (0.8-0.83 95% CI). For MRI, the pooled sensitivity was 0.39 (0.22-0.56 95% CI) and pooled specificity was 0.82 (0.79-0.83 95% CI). The differences in performance of CT and MRI were not statistically significant. CT and MRI demonstrate an equally poor performance in the detection of lymph node metastases from prostate cancer. Reliance on either CT or MRI will misrepresent the patient's true status regarding nodal metastases, and thus misdirect the therapeutic strategies offered to the patient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Emerging applications for ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in MRI.

              Ferumoxytol is an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agent initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an iron replacement therapy for patients with anemia due to chronic renal failure. Recently, ferumoxytol has been investigated extensively as an intravenous contrast agent in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Since it causes regional T1 and T2 * shortening in vivo, conventional pulse sequences can be used following ferumoxytol administration to demonstrate signal enhancement or loss. Ferumoxytol can be administered as a rapid bolus and has a long intravascular half-life on the order of 14-15 hours, making it a potentially useful agent for vascular and perfusion-weighted MRI. In comparison to other USPIOs, ferumoxytol is less limited by allergic and idiosyncratic reactions. Furthermore, since ferumoxytol is an iron-based agent with no potential for causing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, it may be useful as an alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with compromised renal function. Ferumoxytol is ultimately taken up by macrophages/the reticuloendothelial system in the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes, and this uptake mechanism is being explored as a novel imaging technique for vascular lesions, tumors, and lymph nodes. This article reviews the properties of ferumoxytol relevant to MRI as well as many of the uses for the agent currently under investigation. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Radiol
                WJR
                World Journal of Radiology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1949-8470
                28 October 2017
                28 October 2017
                : 9
                : 10
                : 389-399
                Affiliations
                Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, United States. jgzarzour@ 123456uabmc.edu
                Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, United States
                Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, United States
                Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, United States
                Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, United States
                Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, United States
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Zarzour JG was responsible for the conception and design of the article, drafting and revision of the article, gives approval for the final version of the article, and serves as the corresponding author; Galgano S, McConathy J and Thomas JV contributed to the design of the project, participated in drafting and revising, and gives approval for the final version of the manuscript; and Rais-Bahrami S served as the supervision author, contributed to the design of the article, participated in drafting and revisions, and gives approval for the final version of the article.

                Correspondence to: Jessica G Zarzour, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, JTN 357, 619 19 th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States. jgzarzour@ 123456uabmc.edu

                Telephone: +1-205-9343166 Fax: +1-205-9753540

                Article
                jWJR.v9.i10.pg389
                10.4329/wjr.v9.i10.389
                5661167
                29104741
                498d086a-78fb-42d1-9234-61d0fed3fd60
                ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 10 February 2017
                : 26 May 2017
                : 14 July 2017
                Categories
                Review

                prostate cancer,staging,magnetic resonance imaging,ultra-small super paramagnetic iron oxide,molecular imaging,positron emission tomography,lymph nodes

                Comments

                Comment on this article