3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What will it cost to prevent violence against women and girls in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Violence against women and girls (VAWG) is a global problem with profound consequences. Although there is a growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of VAWG prevention interventions, economic data are scarce. We carried out a cross-country study to examine the costs of VAWG prevention interventions in low- and middle-income countries. We collected primary cost data on six different pilot VAWG prevention interventions in six countries: Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia. The interventions varied in their delivery platforms, target populations, settings and theories of change. We adopted a micro-costing methodology. We calculated total costs and a number of unit costs common across interventions (e.g. cost per beneficiary reached). We used the pilot-level cost data to model the expected total costs and unit costs of five interventions scaled up to the national level. Total costs of the pilots varied between ∼US $208 000 in a small group intervention in South Africa to US $2 788 000 in a couples and community-based intervention in Rwanda. Staff costs were the largest cost input across all interventions; consequently, total costs were sensitive to staff time use and salaries. The cost per beneficiary reached in the pilots ranged from ∼US $4 in a community-based intervention in Ghana to US $1324 for one-to-one counselling in Zambia. When scaled up to the national level, total costs ranged from US $32 million in Ghana to US $168 million in Pakistan. Cost per beneficiary reached at scale decreased for all interventions compared to the pilots, except for school-based interventions due to differences in student density per school between the pilot and the national average. The costs of delivering VAWG prevention vary greatly due to differences in the geographical reach, number of intervention components and the complexity of adapting the intervention to the country. Cost-effectiveness analyses are necessary to determine the value for money of interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

            Karen Devries and colleagues conduct a systematic review of longitudinal studies to evaluate the direction of association between symptoms of depression and intimate partner violence. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review.

              Homicide is an important cause of premature mortality globally, but evidence for the magnitude of homicides by intimate partners is scarce and hampered by the large amount of missing information about the victim-offender relationship. The objective of the study was to estimate global and regional prevalence of intimate partner homicide. A systematic search of five databases (Medline, Global Health, Embase, Social Policy, and Web of Science) yielded 2167 abstracts, and resulted in the inclusion of 118 full-text articles with 1122 estimates of the prevalence of intimate partner homicide after double-blind screening. All studies were included that reported the number or proportion of women or men who were murdered by an intimate partner in a country, province, or town, using an inclusive definition of an intimate partner. Additionally, a survey of official sources of 169 countries provided a further 53 estimates. We selected one estimate per country-year using a quality assessment decision algorithm. The median prevalence of intimate partner homicide was calculated by country and region overall, and for women and men separately. Data were obtained for 66 countries. Overall 13·5% (IQR 9·2-18·2) of homicides were committed by an intimate partner, and this proportion was six times higher for female homicides than for male homicides (38·6%, 30·8-45·3, vs 6·3%, 3·1-6·3). Median percentages for all (male and female) and female intimate partner homicide were highest in high-income countries (all, 14·9%, 9·2-18·2; female homicide, 41·2%, 30·8-44·5) and in southeast Asia (18·8%, 11·3-18·8; 58·8%, 58·8-58·8). Adjustments to account for unknown victim-offender relationships generally increased the prevalence, suggesting that results presented are conservative. At least one in seven homicides globally and more than a third of female homicides are perpetrated by an intimate partner. Such violence commonly represents the culmination of a long history of abuse. Strategies to reduce homicide risk include increased investment in intimate partner violence prevention, risk assessments at different points of care, support for women experiencing intimate partner violence, and control of gun ownership for people with a history of violence. Improvements in country-level data collection and monitoring systems are also essential, because data availability and quality varied strongly across regions. WHO, Sigrid Rausing Trust, and the UK Economic and Social Research Council. Copyright © 2013 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd/Inc/BV. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Policy Plan
                Health Policy Plan
                heapol
                Health Policy and Planning
                Oxford University Press
                0268-1080
                1460-2237
                August 2020
                18 June 2020
                18 June 2020
                : 35
                : 7
                : 855-866
                Affiliations
                [c1 ] Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
                [c2 ] Health Economics Research Unit , KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 43640 – 00100, 197 Lenana Place, Off Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya
                [c3 ] School of Public Health , University of Rwanda, Remera Campus, P.O. Box 3286, Kigali KG 11 Avenue, Gasabo, Kigali, Rwanda
                [c4 ] Health Systems Research Unit , South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zyl Drive, Parow Valley, Cape Town 7503, South Africa
                [c5 ] Kintampo Health Research Centre , P.O. Box 200, Kintampo North Municipality, Ghana
                [c6 ] School of Nursing and Midwifery and Community Health Sciences , Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
                [c7 ] National Institute of Public Administration , P.O Box 31990 Plot No. 4810, Dushanbe Road, Lusaka, Zambia
                [c8 ] Nuffield Department of Medicine , University of Oxford, Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
                [c9 ] Gender and Health Research Unit , South African Medical Research Council, 1 Soutpansberg Road, Pretoria, South Africa
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. E-mail: sergio.torresrueda@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk
                Article
                czaa024
                10.1093/heapol/czaa024
                7487331
                32556173
                47253b78-d9b0-4e7e-9f14-7d06b07d4b30
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 March 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Original Articles
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860

                Social policy & Welfare
                costs,violence against women and girls,violence prevention
                Social policy & Welfare
                costs, violence against women and girls, violence prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article