3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spillover effects of childhood obesity prevention interventions: A systematic review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Childhood obesity prevention initiatives are complex interventions that aim to improve children's obesity‐related behaviors and provide health promoting environments. These interventions often impact individuals, communities, and outcomes not primarily targeted by the intervention or policy. To accurately capture the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of childhood obesity prevention interventions, an understanding of the broader impacts (or spillover effects) is required. This systematic review aims to assess the spillover effects of childhood obesity prevention interventions.

          Methods

          Six academic databases and two trial registries were searched (2007–2023) to identify studies reporting quantifiable obesity‐related and other outcomes in individuals or communities not primarily targeted by an obesity prevention intervention. Critical appraisal was undertaken for studies that reported statistically significant findings, and a narrative synthesis of the data was undertaken.

          Results

          Twenty academic studies and 41 trial records were included in the synthesis. The most commonly reported spillovers were diet or nutrition‐related, followed by BMI and physical activity/sedentary behavior. Spillovers were mostly reported in parents/caregivers followed by other family members. Nine of the 20 academic studies reported statistically significant spillover effects.

          Conclusion

          Limited evidence indicates that positive spillover effects of childhood obesity prevention interventions can be observed in parents/caregivers and families of targeted participants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

            The UK Medical Research Council’s widely used guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions has been replaced by a new framework, commissioned jointly by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, which takes account of recent developments in theory and methods and the need to maximise the efficiency, use, and impact of research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

              In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used. This article describes the development of the SWiM guideline for the synthesis of quantitative data of intervention effects and presents the nine SWiM reporting items with accompanying explanations and examples.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Obesity Reviews
                Obesity Reviews
                Wiley
                1467-7881
                1467-789X
                April 2024
                December 29 2023
                April 2024
                : 25
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
                [2 ] Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE) Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
                [3 ] University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu Hawaii USA
                Article
                10.1111/obr.13692
                4105626d-59fe-4869-be44-9526464887f5
                © 2024

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article