13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Facilitated peer mentorship to support aging research: a RE-AIM evaluation of the CoMPAdRE program

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The need for mentorship in aging research among postdoctoral trainees and junior faculty across medical disciplines and subspecialties is increasing, yet there is lack of senior personnel with expertise in aging to fulfill the traditional dyadic mentorship role. Facilitated peer mentorship is grounded in collaborative work among peers with the guidance of a senior mentor.

          Methods and Results:

          We evaluated the Co lumbia University M entor P eer A ging Re search (CoMPAdRE) program, an interprofessional facilitated peer mentorship program for early stage investigators, using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation and Maintenance framework.

          Reach—

          A total of 15 participants, of which 20% were women, from five states and across six medical specialties participated.

          Efficacy—

          Participants published 183 papers, of which over 20% were collaborative papers between CoMPAdRE mentees or mentees-mentor. Participants reported developing skills in negotiation, navigating the academic role, organizing a seminar, management, and leadership over the course of the program. According to the qualitative findings, the most important components of the program included alignment around the aging, learning from national leaders, and developing leadership skills and career networking.

          Adoption—

          Individual level factors included selecting participants with a research track record, willingness to sign a compact, and involvement in shaping the program. An institutional level factor that facilitated program adoption included strong commitment from Department leaders.

          Implementation—

          The program cost $3,259 per participant.

          Maintenance—

          CoMPAdRE is being maintained and is currently incorporating a second cohort of mentees.

          Discussion:

          This RE-AIM evaluation provides lessons learned and strategies for future adoption, implementation, and maintenance of an aging-focused facilitated peer mentorship program.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          7503062
          4443
          J Am Geriatr Soc
          J Am Geriatr Soc
          Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
          0002-8614
          1532-5415
          23 May 2019
          29 January 2019
          April 2019
          07 June 2019
          : 67
          : 4
          : 804-810
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medical Center, Division of Health Informatics, NY, NY, 425 E 61 st St, 10065
          [2 ]Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
          [3 ]New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032
          [4 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10021
          [5 ]University of Michigan and Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
          [6 ]Department of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine; Division of Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 550 1st Avenue, NY, NY 10016
          [7 ]Clinical Cardiovascular Research Laboratory for the Elderly, Allen Hospital of New York Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10034
          Author notes

          Author Contributions:

          Ruth M. Masterson Creber: drafting of manuscript, data collection, data analysis

          Matthew R Baldwin: data collection, data analysis, substantive edits to manuscript

          Patrick J. Brown: data collection, data analysis, substantive edits to manuscript

          Maya K. Rao: substantive edits to manuscript

          Parag Goyal: substantive edits to manuscript

          Scott Hummel: substantive edits to manuscript

          John A. Dodson: substantive edits to manuscript

          Stephen Helmke: data collection, substantive edits to manuscript

          Maurer M. funding, study design, data collection, data analysis, substantive edits to manuscript

          Corresponding author: Ruth M. Masterson Creber, PhD, MSc, RN, 425 E 61 st St, Suite 301, Rm 323, New York, NY 10065, rmc2009@ 123456med.cornell.edu , @ 123456RMCreber
          Alternate corresponding author: Mathew Maurer, MD @ 123456MathewMaurer
          Article
          PMC6554736 PMC6554736 6554736 nihpa1009516
          10.1111/jgs.15792
          6554736
          30693950
          3f7afd8a-68ea-42d0-b1c5-44013b595e9e
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Mentoring,aging,older adults,geriatrics,academic medicine,early career,faculty development,peer group,implementation science

          Comments

          Comment on this article