3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of the Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation System on Heartburn, Regurgitation and Esophageal Acid Exposure in GERD Patients—An Uncontrolled Feasibility Study

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are associated with a high failure rate. Our uncontrolled feasibility study aimed determining the effect of a transcutaneous electrical stimulation system (TESS) on GERD symptoms and acid exposure time (AET).

          Methods

          Recruited patients with heartburn and regurgitation. During the first phase (one‐week, run‐in period, off‐PPI's), patients completed symptom diaries and demographic questionnaires. Thereafter, all patients underwent gastroscopy with subsequent placement of a wireless esophageal pH capsule, off‐PPI. Based on pH analysis in the first 24 h, only those with increased AET (percent total time pH < 4 above 6%) continued to the next phase. During that phase, patients were treated for up to 3 weeks with TESS and documented their symptoms. The Primary endpoint was the magnitude of reduction in GERD‐related symptoms. The secondary endpoints were the magnitude of reduction of AET and DeMeester score, as compared with their baseline values.

          Results

          Included 31 patients and of those, 26 patients (42% females, aged 49 ± 15 years, mean BMI 25 ± 3 kg/m 2) completed the first two phases of the study.

          At baseline, mean number of daily heartburn and regurgitation episodes was 2.55 ± 1.79 and 1.40 ± 1.73, respectively. Following TESS, mean number of daily heartburn and regurgitation episodes dropped to 0.77 ± 0.75 and 0.36 ± 0.8, respectively ( p < 0.001). At base line, mean AET and DeMeester score were 12.4 ± 5.6 and 32.1 ± 12.7, respectively. Following TESS mean AET dropped to 6.0 ± 3.5 and DeMeester score dropped to 16.2 ± 8.2 ( p < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          TESS is effective in reducing both symptoms and esophageal AET in GERD patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis.

          Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are common in the community, but there has been no definitive systematic review and meta-analysis of data from all studies to estimate their global prevalence, or potential risk factors for them.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

            Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) commonly starts with an empiric trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and complementary lifestyle measures, for patients without alarm symptoms. Optimization of therapy (improving compliance and timing of PPI doses), or increasing PPI dosage to twice daily in select circumstances, can reduce persistent symptoms. Patients with continued symptoms can be evaluated with endoscopy and tests of esophageal physiology, to better determine their disease phenotype and optimize treatment. Laparoscopic fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, and endoscopic therapies can benefit patients with well-characterized GERD. Patients with functional diseases that overlap with or mimic GERD can also be treated with neuromodulators (primarily antidepressants), or psychological interventions (psychotherapy, hypnotherapy, cognitive and behavioral therapy). Future approaches to treatment of GERD include potassium-competitive acid blockers, reflux-reducing agents, bile acid binders, injection of inert substances into the esophagogastric junction, and electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis.

              Several studies have raised concern regarding the possible association between proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We aimed to perform a systematic review of incident and recurrent CDI in PPI users, and to evaluate the relative impact of concurrent antibiotic use, or switching acid suppression to histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs). We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2011 for controlled observational studies that reported on the risk of CDI with and without PPI use. We performed random effects meta-analysis and assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We included 42 observational studies (30 case-control, 12 cohort) totalling 313,000 participants overall. Pooled analysis of 39 studies showed a statistically significant association between PPI use and risk of developing CDI, odds ratio (OR) 1.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-2.85, P<0.001, I(2)=85%) compared with non-users. A pooled analysis of three studies showed a significant associated risk of recurrent CDI associated with PPIs, OR 2.51 (95% CI 1.16-5.44, P=0.005, I(2)=78%). Subgroup analysis failed to fully clarify the source of the substantial statistical heterogeneity. Adjusted indirect comparison demonstrated that use of H2RAs as an alternative carried a lower-risk OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.97) compared with PPIs. Conversely, concomitant use of PPI and antibiotics conferred a greater-risk OR 1.96 (95% CI 1.03-3.70) above that of PPIs alone. For PPI and antibiotics, the Rothman's synergy index was 1.36 and attributable proportion of risk from interaction 0.19, indicating an increased risk from interaction beyond the effects of each drug alone. Despite the substantial statistical and clinical heterogeneity, our findings indicate a probable association between PPI use and incident and recurrent CDI. This risk is further increased by concomitant use of antibiotics and PPI, whereas H2RAs may be less harmful.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Neurogastroenterology & Motility
                Neurogastroenterology Motil
                Wiley
                1350-1925
                1365-2982
                January 23 2025
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Division of Gastroenterology Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus Petah Tikva Israel
                [2 ] School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
                [3 ] Department of Gastroenterology Rambam Health Care Campus, Faculty of Medicine Technion Institute Haifa Israel
                [4 ] Statistics Education Unit The Academic College of Tel Aviv‐Yafo Tel Aviv Israel
                [5 ] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel
                [6 ] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bnai‐Zion Medical Center Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute Haifa Israel
                [7 ] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Meir Medical Center Kfar‐Saba Israel
                [8 ] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology MetroHealth Medical Center Cleveland Ohio USA
                Article
                10.1111/nmo.15002
                3dd9bcb6-fcfe-46f8-9df5-90cc90424c07
                © 2025

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content236

                Most referenced authors201