16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Recruitment, Promotion and Retention of Women in Academic Medicine: How Institutions Are Addressing Gender Disparities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Greater numbers of women in medicine have not resulted in more women achieving senior positions. Programs supporting recruitment, promotion and retention of women in academic medicine could help to achieve greater advancement of more women to leadership positions. Qualitative research was conducted to understand such programs at 23 institutions and, using the social ecological model, examine how they operate at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, academic community and policy levels.

          Methods

          Telephone interviews were conducted with faculty representatives (N=44) of the Group on Women in Medicine and Science (GWIMS), Diversity and Inclusion (GDI) or senior leaders with knowledge on gender climate in 24 medical schools. Four trained interviewers conducted semi-structured interviews that addressed faculty perceptions of gender equity and advancement, which were audio-taped and transcribed. The data were categorized into three content areas: recruitment, promotion and retention, and coded a priori for each area based on their social ecological level of operation.

          Findings

          Participants from nearly 40% of the institutions reported no special programs for recruiting, promoting or retaining women, largely describing such programming as unnecessary. Existing programs primarily targeted the individual and interpersonal levels simultaneously, via training, mentoring, and networking, or the institutional level, via search committee trainings, child and elder care, and spousal hiring programs. Lesser effort at the academic community and policy levels were described.

          Conclusions

          Our findings demonstrate that many US medical schools have no programs supporting gender equity among medical faculty. Existing programs primarily target the individual or interpersonal level of the social ecological interaction. The academic community and broader policy environment require greater focus as levels with little attention to advancing women’s careers. Universal multi-level efforts are needed to more effectively advance the careers of medical women faculty and support gender equity.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          9101000
          2221
          Womens Health Issues
          Womens Health Issues
          Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
          1049-3867
          1878-4321
          10 January 2017
          04 January 2017
          May-Jun 2017
          01 May 2018
          : 27
          : 3
          : 374-381
          Affiliations
          [a ]Massachusetts General Hospital, Women’s Health, Yawkey 4B, Boston, MA 02114
          [b ]Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Women’s Health Unit, Boston, MA 02118
          [c ]University of California, San Diego, 10111 North Torrey Pines Rd, MC-0507, La Jolla, California 92093
          [d ]Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord St., Boston, MA 02118
          [e ]Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St. Box 63, Boston, MA 02111
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Dr. Phyllis L. Carr, MD, Women’s Health, Yawkey 4B, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, pcarr1@ 123456partners.org , Phone: 617-724-6700, Fax: 617-724-6725
          Article
          PMC5435548 PMC5435548 5435548 nihpa840992
          10.1016/j.whi.2016.11.003
          5435548
          28063849
          33810762-db6f-4a12-86c7-aa2431acac11
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Women,Recruitment,Retention,Promotion,Programs,Academic Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article