41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Amyloid-β Pathway in Alzheimer’s Disease

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Breakthroughs in molecular medicine have positioned the amyloid-β (Aβ) pathway at the center of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathophysiology. While the detailed molecular mechanisms of the pathway and the spatial-temporal dynamics leading to synaptic failure, neurodegeneration, and clinical onset are still under intense investigation, the established biochemical alterations of the Aβ cycle remain the core biological hallmark of AD and are promising targets for the development of disease-modifying therapies. Here, we systematically review and update the vast state-of-the-art literature of Aβ science with evidence from basic research studies to human genetic and multi-modal biomarker investigations, which supports a crucial role of Aβ pathway dyshomeostasis in AD pathophysiological dynamics. We discuss the evidence highlighting a differentiated interaction of distinct Aβ species with other AD-related biological mechanisms, such as tau-mediated, neuroimmune and inflammatory changes, as well as a neurochemical imbalance. Through the lens of the latest development of multimodal in vivo biomarkers of AD, this cross-disciplinary review examines the compelling hypothesis- and data-driven rationale for Aβ-targeting therapeutic strategies in development for the early treatment of AD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references423

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease

          In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association created separate diagnostic recommendations for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific progress in the interim led to an initiative by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association to update and unify the 2011 guidelines. This unifying update is labeled a “research framework” because its intended use is for observational and interventional research, not routine clinical care. In the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined by its underlying pathologic processes that can be documented by postmortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. The diagnosis is not based on the clinical consequences of the disease (i.e., symptoms/signs) in this research framework, which shifts the definition of AD in living people from a syndromal to a biological construct. The research framework focuses on the diagnosis of AD with biomarkers in living persons. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration [AT(N)]. This ATN classification system groups different biomarkers (imaging and biofluids) by the pathologic process each measures. The AT(N) system is flexible in that new biomarkers can be added to the three existing AT(N) groups, and new biomarker groups beyond AT(N) can be added when they become available. We focus on AD as a continuum, and cognitive staging may be accomplished using continuous measures. However, we also outline two different categorical cognitive schemes for staging the severity of cognitive impairment: a scheme using three traditional syndromal categories and a six-stage numeric scheme. It is important to stress that this framework seeks to create a common language with which investigators can generate and test hypotheses about the interactions among different pathologic processes (denoted by biomarkers) and cognitive symptoms. We appreciate the concern that this biomarker-based research framework has the potential to be misused. Therefore, we emphasize, first, it is premature and inappropriate to use this research framework in general medical practice. Second, this research framework should not be used to restrict alternative approaches to hypothesis testing that do not use biomarkers. There will be situations where biomarkers are not available or requiring them would be counterproductive to the specific research goals (discussed in more detail later in the document). Thus, biomarker-based research should not be considered a template for all research into age-related cognitive impairment and dementia; rather, it should be applied when it is fit for the purpose of the specific research goals of a study. Importantly, this framework should be examined in diverse populations. Although it is possible that β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau deposits are not causal in AD pathogenesis, it is these abnormal protein deposits that define AD as a unique neurodegenerative disease among different disorders that can lead to dementia. We envision that defining AD as a biological construct will enable a more accurate characterization and understanding of the sequence of events that lead to cognitive impairment that is associated with AD, as well as the multifactorial etiology of dementia. This approach also will enable a more precise approach to interventional trials where specific pathways can be targeted in the disease process and in the appropriate people.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia

            A reactive astrocyte subtype termed A1 is induced after injury or disease of the central nervous system and subsequently promotes the death of neurons and oligodendrocytes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease.

              Increasing evidence suggests that Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis is not restricted to the neuronal compartment, but includes strong interactions with immunological mechanisms in the brain. Misfolded and aggregated proteins bind to pattern recognition receptors on microglia and astroglia, and trigger an innate immune response characterised by release of inflammatory mediators, which contribute to disease progression and severity. Genome-wide analysis suggests that several genes that increase the risk for sporadic Alzheimer's disease encode factors that regulate glial clearance of misfolded proteins and the inflammatory reaction. External factors, including systemic inflammation and obesity, are likely to interfere with immunological processes of the brain and further promote disease progression. Modulation of risk factors and targeting of these immune mechanisms could lead to future therapeutic or preventive strategies for Alzheimer's disease. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Harald_Hampel@eisai.com
                Andrea_Vergallo@eisai.com
                Journal
                Mol Psychiatry
                Mol Psychiatry
                Molecular Psychiatry
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1359-4184
                1476-5578
                30 August 2021
                30 August 2021
                2021
                : 26
                : 10
                : 5481-5503
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.418767.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0599 8842, Eisai Inc., Neurology Business Group, ; Woodcliff Lake, NJ USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.1649.a, ISNI 000000009445082X, Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, , Sahlgrenska University Hospital, ; Mölndal, Sweden
                [4 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, , the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, ; Mölndal, Sweden
                [5 ]GRID grid.4280.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, Memory Aging and Cognition Centre, Departments of Pharmacology and Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, , National University of Singapore, ; Singapore, Singapore
                [6 ]GRID grid.215352.2, ISNI 0000000121845633, Department of Biology and Neurosciences Institute, , University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), ; San Antonio, TX USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.49606.3d, ISNI 0000 0001 1364 9317, Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, , Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cell Therapy Center, Hanyang University Hospital, ; Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [8 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, Department of Psychiatry, , University of Pittsburgh, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                [9 ]GRID grid.1008.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, Department of Medicine, , The University of Melbourne, ; Melbourne, VIC Australia
                [10 ]GRID grid.42505.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2156 6853, USC Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute, ; San Diego, CA USA
                [11 ]GRID grid.5335.0, ISNI 0000000121885934, Centre for Misfolding Diseases, Department of Chemistry, , University of Cambridge, ; Cambridge, UK
                [12 ]GRID grid.26999.3d, ISNI 0000 0001 2151 536X, Department of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, , The University of Tokyo, ; Tokyo, Japan
                [13 ]GRID grid.1008.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, Laureate Professor of Dementia Research, , Florey Institute and The University of Melbourne, ; Parkville, VIC Australia
                [14 ]GRID grid.8993.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9457, Uppsala University, Department of of Public Health/Geriatrics, ; Uppsala, Sweden
                [15 ]BioArctic AB, Stockholm, Sweden
                [16 ]GRID grid.272362.0, ISNI 0000 0001 0806 6926, Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, , University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV), ; Las Vegas, NV USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-8982
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-9225
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-0172
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-9875
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-1610
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-6384
                Article
                1249
                10.1038/s41380-021-01249-0
                8758495
                34456336
                2a53f7d1-f855-48ef-a125-9e53e6954e0e
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 19 February 2021
                : 19 July 2021
                : 28 July 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100002565, Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF);
                Award ID: RDAPB-201809-2016615
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021

                Molecular medicine
                neuroscience,diseases,diagnostic markers
                Molecular medicine
                neuroscience, diseases, diagnostic markers

                Comments

                Comment on this article