3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emotional responses to climate change in Norway and Ireland: a validation of the Inventory of Climate Emotions (ICE) in two European countries and an inspection of its nomological span

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is an increasing research interest in emotional responses to climate change and their role in climate action and psycho-social impacts of climate change. At the same time, emotional experience of climate change is multidimensional and influenced by a variety of factors, including the local cultural context. Here, we contribute to the scientific debate about this topic with original quality-controlled data from the general populations in Norway ( N = 491) and Ireland ( N = 485). We investigate the cross-cultural validity and the nomological span of eight distinct emotional responses to climate change - climate anger, climate contempt, climate enthusiasm, climate powerlessness, climate guilt, climate isolation, climate anxiety, and climate sorrow - measured using the recently introduced Inventory of Climate Emotions. We first validate the 8-factor structure of the Norwegian and English language versions of the ICE. Subsequently, we demonstrate a high degree of cross-cultural measurement invariance for these eight climate emotions. Finally, we explore the relationships between these emotional responses and a range of theoretically relevant variables. In this final step, we show that climate emotions are differentially linked to climate change perceptions, support for mitigation policies, socio-demographic factors, feelings of loneliness and alienation, environmental activism, and the willingness to prioritize the natural environment over one’s immediate self-interests. Some of these links are also differentiated by the cultural context. This research presents further evidence for the structural, cross-cultural, and concurrent validity of climate emotions as postulated in the ICE framework. Moreover, it provides tools in the form of validated Norwegian and English language versions of the ICE, the complete R code for the validation analysis, as well as an informed basis for cross-cultural research on emotional responses to climate change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references117

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The weirdest people in the world?

              Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                08 February 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1211272
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim, Norway
                [2] 2Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences , Warsaw, Poland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Paola Passafaro, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

                Reviewed by: Panu Pihkala, University of Helsinki, Finland

                Marlis Wullenkord, Lund University, Sweden

                *Correspondence: Michalina Marczak, michalina.marczak@ 123456gmail.com

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1211272
                10881694
                38390416
                27f87b9b-e85c-4623-a705-b56537c1c66f
                Copyright © 2024 Marczak, Wierzba, Kossowski, Marchewka, Morote and Klöckner.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 April 2023
                : 15 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 123, Pages: 18, Words: 15537
                Funding
                The research leading to these results has received funding from the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014–2021 No. 2019/34/H/ HS6/00677. The work of MM was additionally funded by NTNU–Norwegian University of Science and Technology Doctoral Scholarship Program.
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Environmental Psychology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                emotional responses,climate change,inventory of climate emotions (ice),cross-cultural validity,climate anger,climate anxiety,climate guilt

                Comments

                Comment on this article