1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of intrafraction couch shifts for proton treatment delivery in head‐and‐neck cancer patients: Toward optimal imaging frequency

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Treatment planning for head‐and‐neck (H&N) cancer, in particular oropharynx, nasopharynx, and paranasal sinus cases, at our center requires noncoplanar proton beams due to the complexity of the anatomy and target location. Targeting accuracy for all beams is carefully evaluated by using image guidance before delivering proton beam therapy (PBT). In this study, we analyzed couch shifts to evaluate whether imaging is required before delivering each field with different couch angles.

          Methods

          After the Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective analysis was performed on data from 28 H&N patients treated with PBT. Each plan was made with two‐to‐three noncoplanar and two‐to‐three coplanar fields. Cone‐beam computed tomography and orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) images were acquired for setup and before delivering each field, respectively. The Cartesian (longitudinal, vertical, and lateral) and angular (pitch and roll) shifts for each field were recorded from the treatment summary on the first two fractions and every subsequent fifth fraction. A net magnitude of the three‐dimensional (3D) shift in Cartesian coordinates was calculated, and a 3D vector was created from the 6 degrees of freedom coordinates for transforming couch shifts in the system coordinate to the beam's‐eye view.

          Results

          A total of 3219 Cartesian and 2146 angular shift values were recorded for 28 patients. Of the Cartesian shifts, 2069 were zero (64.3%), and 1150 (35.7%) were nonzero (range, −7 to 11 mm). Of the angular shifts, 1034 (48.2%) were zero, and 1112 (51.8%) were nonzero (range, −3.0° to 3.2°). For 17 patients, the couch shifts increased toward the end of the treatment course. We also found that patients with higher body mass index (BMI) presented increased net couch shifts ( p < 0.001). With BMI < 27, all overall net shift averages were <2 mm, and overall maximum net shifts were <6 mm.

          Conclusions

          These results confirm the need for orthogonal kV imaging before delivering each field of H&N PBT at our center, where a couch rotation is involved.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice.

          We report the first clinical experience and toxicity of multifield optimization (MFO) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for patients with head and neck tumors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.

            Setup, range, and anatomical uncertainties influence the dose delivered with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), but clinical quantification of these errors for oropharyngeal cancer is lacking. We quantified these factors and investigated treatment fidelity, that is, robustness, as influenced by adaptive planning and by applying more beam directions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Incident learning in radiation oncology: A review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Nrusingh.Biswal@umm.edu
                Journal
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                10.1002/(ISSN)1526-9914
                ACM2
                Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1526-9914
                14 October 2022
                December 2022
                : 23
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/acm2.v23.12 )
                : e13795
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Radiation Oncology University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Nrusingh C. Biswal, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 850 W Baltimore St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

                Email: Nrusingh.Biswal@ 123456umm.edu

                Article
                ACM213795
                10.1002/acm2.13795
                9797163
                36239306
                1cc126a0-d518-4ee5-93a5-0c11d9b1654b
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 September 2022
                : 16 August 2021
                : 13 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 8, Words: 4238
                Categories
                Radiation Oncology Physics
                Radiation Oncology Physics
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:28.12.2022

                cone‐beam ct,couch shift,h&n,image‐guided radiation therapy,kv imaging,proton therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article