6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Designing a GIS‐based supply chain for producing carinata‐based sustainable aviation fuel in Georgia, USA

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Carinata is a potential crop for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production in the southern USA. However, as a novel crop, the cost‐effectiveness and environmental feasibility of carinata feedstock are unknown, and there are questions about the optimal supply chain configuration for carinata‐based SAF production. This study aims to design a supply chain model for carinata‐based SAF production by optimizing the location of farms and facilities (e.g. storage units, crushing mills, biorefineries) for a minimum transportation cost under a set of supply and demand conditions. An integrated mixed‐integer linear programming (MILP) model was combined with geographical information system (GIS) analysis to design a spatially explicit supply chain configuration. The GIS‐based network analysis considered all of the counties in Georgia to set the candidate locations of carinata farms and facilities, and determined minimum cost and emission routes between those counties and the airport using existing transportation networks and modes (e.g. road, rail and pipeline). The MILP model determined the final selection of the farms and the number of facilities and their locations over those minimum‐cost routes. With this supply chain configuration, the minimum price of SAF was $0.92 L −1, which is $0.44 higher than conventional aviation fuel (CAF). The associated carbon intensity of SAF was estimated at 940.7 g CO 2e L −1, a reduction of 66% relative to the carbon intensity of equivalent CAF. The study found that a carbon tax (or subsidy) of $230.48 t CO 2e −1 would be needed to overcome the cost differential with CAF and promote carinata‐based SAF in Georgia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: Overview, key issues and challenges

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production

              Background The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). Results Fischer–Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86–104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77–80%) and sugarcane- (71–75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60–75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity). Conclusions Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
                Biofuels Bioprod Bioref
                Wiley
                1932-104X
                1932-1031
                July 2023
                March 10 2023
                July 2023
                : 17
                : 4
                : 786-802
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
                [2 ] Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA
                [3 ] Energy Systems and Infrastructure Analysis Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont Illinois 60439 USA
                Article
                10.1002/bbb.2483
                198ac34a-cbe1-42f4-b4c6-1c86cf39d850
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article