25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA).

          Results

          Fischer–Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86–104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77–80%) and sugarcane- (71–75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60–75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity).

          Conclusions

          Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century

          Aviation emissions contribute to the radiative forcing (RF) of climate. Of importance are emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), aerosols and their precursors (soot and sulphate), and increased cloudiness in the form of persistent linear contrails and induced-cirrus cloudiness. The recent Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) quantified aviation's RF contribution for 2005 based upon 2000 operations data. Aviation has grown strongly over the past years, despite world-changing events in the early 2000s; the average annual passenger traffic growth rate was 5.3% yr−1 between 2000 and 2007, resulting in an increase of passenger traffic of 38%. Presented here are updated values of aviation RF for 2005 based upon new operations data that show an increase in traffic of 22.5%, fuel use of 8.4% and total aviation RF of 14% (excluding induced-cirrus enhancement) over the period 2000–2005. The lack of physical process models and adequate observational data for aviation-induced cirrus effects limit confidence in quantifying their RF contribution. Total aviation RF (excluding induced cirrus) in 2005 was ∼55 mW m−2 (23–87 mW m−2, 90% likelihood range), which was 3.5% (range 1.3–10%, 90% likelihood range) of total anthropogenic forcing. Including estimates for aviation-induced cirrus RF increases the total aviation RF in 2005–78 mW m−2 (38–139 mW m−2, 90% likelihood range), which represents 4.9% of total anthropogenic forcing (2–14%, 90% likelihood range). Future scenarios of aviation emissions for 2050 that are consistent with IPCC SRES A1 and B2 scenario assumptions have been presented that show an increase of fuel usage by factors of 2.7–3.9 over 2000. Simplified calculations of total aviation RF in 2050 indicate increases by factors of 3.0–4.0 over the 2000 value, representing 4–4.7% of total RF (excluding induced cirrus). An examination of a range of future technological options shows that substantive reductions in aviation fuel usage are possible only with the introduction of radical technologies. Incorporation of aviation into an emissions trading system offers the potential for overall (i.e., beyond the aviation sector) CO2 emissions reductions. Proposals exist for introduction of such a system at a European level, but no agreement has been reached at a global level.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A review on process conditions for optimum bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31302537640 , S.A.deJong@uu.nl
                K.Y.Antonissen@students.uu.nl
                R.hoefnagels@uu.nl
                Laura.lonza@ec.europa.eu
                Mqwang@anl.gov
                A.p.c.faaij@rug.nl
                H.M.Junginger@uu.nl
                Journal
                Biotechnol Biofuels
                Biotechnol Biofuels
                Biotechnology for Biofuels
                BioMed Central (London )
                1754-6834
                14 March 2017
                14 March 2017
                2017
                : 10
                : 64
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000120346234, GRID grid.5477.1, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, , Utrecht University, ; Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1758 4137, GRID grid.434554.7, European Commission-Directorate for Energy, Transport and Climate, Sustainable Transport Unit, , EC-Joint Research Centre, ; Via E. Fermi 2749, 27027 Ispra, Italy
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1939 4845, GRID grid.187073.a, , Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, ; 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439-4844 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, GRID grid.4830.f, Energy Academy Europe, , University of Groningen, ; Nijenborgh 6, Groningen, 9700 AE The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8110-4527
                Article
                739
                10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7
                5348797
                28293294
                77cbe93d-e455-44b0-97fe-0dc9c023f510
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 January 2017
                : 18 February 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Climate-KIC
                Award ID: APSP0002
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Biotechnology
                renewable jet fuel,aviation,greenhouse gas emissions,life-cycle assessment,alternative jet fuel,biofuel,bioenergy,climate change

                Comments

                Comment on this article