4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have progressively become a popular tool for making optimal clinical decisions. The literature shows that the poor quality of CPGs can form a barrier against adhering to them, resulting in a suboptimal level of healthcare. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of CPGs in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.

          Methods

          The authors searched in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through the Ovid interface on May 25, 2019. Keywords relating to CPGs and MENA countries were combined using Boolean search operators. The search was not limited to specific diseases. The quality of guidelines was appraised by two reviewers independently using the AGREE II Instrument. Discrepancies within a group were resolved through the involvement of a principle investigator.

          Results

          A total of 61 CPGs were appraised. These guidelines were mainly from Saudi Arabia, and the most covered disease topic was cancer. Among the six domains of the AGREE II Instrument, CPGs scored the highest on clarity of presentation (mean 82%), while the lowest score was granted to the rigor of development domain (mean 28%). This indicates substantial deficiencies in reporting the developmental processes of CPGs and the resources used for the synthesis of evidence.

          Conclusion

          From this review, it was found that the number of retrieved guidelines published in the MENA region is limited considering the large geographical area of the MENA region. The main domains that have higher quality scores were clarity of presentation and scope and purpose, whereas domains with the lowest scores were rigor of development and applicability. The authors’ findings will help policymakers identify areas for improvement in CPGs, which can lead them to implement strategies such as the training of individuals and recruitment of international experts to ultimately develop high-quality CPGs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

            Decision aids are interventions that support patients by making their decisions explicit, providing information about options and associated benefits/harms, and helping clarify congruence between decisions and personal values.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Multidiscip Healthc
                J Multidiscip Healthc
                jmdh
                jmulthealth
                Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
                Dove
                1178-2390
                09 February 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 297-309
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [2 ]College of Pharmacy, Jazan University , Jazan, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Saja H Almazrou Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University , Riyadh, 14511, Saudi Arabia Email Salmazrou@ksu.edu.sa
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9307-2913
                Article
                284689
                10.2147/JMDH.S284689
                7881789
                33603389
                0c3941ff-266f-4f87-ae66-87a419126ef9
                © 2021 Almazrou et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 07 October 2020
                : 18 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, References: 110, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Original Research

                Medicine
                agree ii instrument,clinical practice guideline,mena,middle east,quality
                Medicine
                agree ii instrument, clinical practice guideline, mena, middle east, quality

                Comments

                Comment on this article