For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
61
views
107
references
 Top references
cited by
41
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      192
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Are reports of psychological stress higher in occupational studies? A systematic review across occupational and population based studies.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The general health questionnaire (GHQ) is commonly used to assess symptoms of common mental disorder (CMD). Prevalence estimates for CMD caseness from UK population studies are thought to be in the range of 14-17%, and the UK occupational studies of which we are aware indicate a higher prevalence. This review will synthesise the existing research using the GHQ from both population and occupational studies and will compare the weighted prevalence estimates between them.

          Related collections

          Most cited references107

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

          Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon Thompson, Jonathan Deeks … (2003)
          Article 0 comments Cited 9710 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice

            A Tversky, D Kahneman (1981)
            The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways. Reversals of preference are demonstrated in choices regarding monetary outcomes, both hypothetical and real, and in questions pertaining to the loss of human lives. The effects of frames on preferences are compared to the effects of perspectives on perceptual appearance. The dependence of preferences on the formulation of decision problems is a significant concern for the theory of rational choice.
            Article 0 comments Cited 750 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

              D Kahneman, A Tversky (1981)
              The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways. Reversals of preference are demonstrated in choices regarding monetary outcomes, both hypothetical and real, and in questions pertaining to the loss of human lives. The effects of frames on preferences are compared to the effects of perspectives on perceptual appearance. The dependence of preferences on the formulation of decision problems is a significant concern for the theory of rational choice.
              Article 0 comments Cited 293 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
                Title: PloS one
                Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
                ISSN (Electronic): 1932-6203
                ISSN (Print): 1932-6203
                Publication date (Electronic): 2013
                Volume: 8
                Issue: 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ] King's Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
                Article
                Publisher Item ID: PONE-D-13-11519
                DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078693
                PMC ID: 3817075
                PubMed ID: 24223840
                SO-VID: dce06f45-2568-475d-b84d-98415baaa721
                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content192

                See all similar

                Cited by50

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors641

                See all reference authors