6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A framework for analysis of research risks and benefits to participants in standard of care pragmatic clinical trials.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Standard of care pragmatic clinical trials that compare treatments already in use could improve care and reduce costs, but there is considerable debate about the research risks of standard of care pragmatic clinical trials and how to apply informed consent regulations to such trials. We sought to develop a framework integrating the insights from opposing sides of the debate.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Trials
          Clinical trials (London, England)
          SAGE Publications
          1740-7753
          1740-7745
          Dec 2016
          : 13
          : 6
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
          [2 ] Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA scott.kim@nih.gov.
          [3 ] Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
          Article
          1740774516656945 NIHMS794199
          10.1177/1740774516656945
          5133165
          27365010
          04ccd125-9f23-4ef7-8fe4-53e7978f965f
          History

          research risk analysis,informed consent,pragmatic randomized control trials,research ethics,Comparative effectiveness randomized control trials

          Comments

          Comment on this article