Register Dashboard
+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the Infection Burden and Associated Risk Factors in Children under 5 Across Jaipur's Urban Slums: A Feasibility Study Using a One Health Approach

      Declined for publication


            Author and article information

            UCL Open: Environment Preprint
            UCL Press
            23 December 2020
            [1 ] Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL
            [2 ] Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL
            [3 ] Freetown City Council, Freetown, Sierra Leone
            [4 ] Jeevan Ashram Sanstha
            [5 ] Indonesia One Health University Network
            [6 ] Health and Wellbeing Department, Southwark Council
            [7 ] Bartlett School of Environmental Design and Engineering, UCL
            [8 ] Institute for Global Health, UCL
            [9 ] Jawaharlal Nehru University
            [10 ] Department of Geography, UCL

            This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

            Life sciences, Public health, Infectious disease & Microbiology

            One Health, Infectious Diseases, Children Under Five, Slum, India, Pollution and health


            Date: 29 November 2021

            Handling Editor: Carla-Leanne Washbourne and Dan Osborn

            Editorial decision: This article has been mutually declined for further publication in the journal by the Editors of UCL Open: Environment and the Authors and the article is now considered withdrawn from submission. This preprint (and all other versions of it) will remain online on the preprint server with its registered DOI, but the article is no longer under consideration for peer review at UCL Open: Environment and the authors are free to submit this manuscript to any other relevant journal of their choice. For more information about this please read the journal’s Editorial Policy online at


            Additional notes from the Editors

            The paper in its current form presents material that is too preliminary in nature. More data and additional material is needed to provide a fuller context and framing for the work. 

            The intention to produce a preliminary set of results that would be supplemented by more data later is appreciated but we feel at present the paper lacks the following specifics and until these issues have been dealt with the paper is not suitable for full publication:

            1. The paper contains a very limited set of data from only a few samples and the sample size is thought inadequate for a study with the number of complexities this one inevitably faces. Sample size would have to be at least double to reach the minimum required in social science-based approaches where standard methodologies are not always used or usable.
            2. There needs to be a wider context provided for the work. There have been numerous studies of child health in India and in Jaipur district. This study needs placing in that context. Jaipur is a bustling mixed city with many poorer areas facing health challenges. Although various areas are mentioned as providing samples the information provided on these areas is very limited. There is too little here to help put the study and the results in any kind of context. Important factors to set out about each area would include social, economic environmental and cultural/religious ones. Given the preliminary nature of the work done, having this context would provide a reader with a better way of interpreting the results.
            3. The framing of the work is unclear. Although the One Health approach is a very promising way of positioning the paper the references to the One Health initiative seem to have been added in retrospect rather than being part of the design of the study from the outset. As it stands, the paper does not demonstrate how the work as presented, and as it might develop, is related to the One Health framework.
            4. Also with respect to framing, it is unclear how the data was gathered by what appear to be local health workers or how ethical permissions were gathered from subjects who may have not realised there was involvement of UCL authors in interpreting results.
            2021-11-29 10:59 UTC

            Date: 06 January 2021

            Handling Editor: Carla-Leanne Washbourne

            The article has been revised, this article remains a preprint article and peer-review has not been completed. It is under consideration following submission to UCL Open: Environment Preprint for open peer review.

            2021-01-06 17:19 UTC

            Comment on this article