33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Under-vaccinated groups in Europe and their beliefs, attitudes and reasons for non-vaccination; two systematic reviews

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite effective national immunisation programmes in Europe, some groups remain incompletely or un-vaccinated (‘under-vaccinated’), with underserved minorities and certain religious/ideological groups repeatedly being involved in outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases (VPD).

          Gaining insight into factors regarding acceptance of vaccination of ‘under-vaccinated groups’ (UVGs) might give opportunities to communicate with them in a trusty and reliable manner that respects their belief system and that, maybe, increase vaccination uptake. We aimed to identify and describe UVGs in Europe and to describe beliefs, attitudes and reasons for non-vaccination in the identified UVGs.

          Methods

          We defined a UVG as a group of persons who share the same beliefs and/or live in socially close-knit communities in Europe and who have/had historically low vaccination coverage and/or experienced outbreaks of VPDs since 1950. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases using specific search term combinations. For the first systematic review, studies that described a group in Europe with an outbreak or low vaccination coverage for a VPD were selected and for the second systematic review, studies that described possible factors that are associated with non-vaccination in these groups were selected.

          Results

          We selected 48 articles out of 606 and 13 articles out of 406 from the first and second search, respectively. Five UVGs were identified in the literature: Orthodox Protestant communities, Anthroposophists, Roma, Irish Travellers, and Orthodox Jewish communities. The main reported factors regarding vaccination were perceived non-severity of traditional “childhood” diseases, fear of vaccine side-effects, and need for more information about for example risk of vaccination.

          Conclusions

          Within each UVG identified, there are a variety of health beliefs and objections to vaccination. In addition, similar factors are shared by several of these groups. Communication strategies regarding these similar factors such as educating people about the risks associated with being vaccinated versus not being vaccinated, addressing their concerns, and countering vaccination myths present among members of a specific UVG through a trusted source, can establish a reliable relationship with these groups and increase their vaccination uptake. Furthermore, other interventions such as improving access to health care could certainly increase vaccination uptake in Roma and Irish travellers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Countering antivaccination attitudes.

            Three times as many cases of measles were reported in the United States in 2014 as in 2013. The reemergence of measles has been linked to a dangerous trend: parents refusing vaccinations for their children. Efforts have been made to counter people's antivaccination attitudes by providing scientific evidence refuting vaccination myths, but these interventions have proven ineffective. This study shows that highlighting factual information about the dangers of communicable diseases can positively impact people's attitudes to vaccination. This method outperformed alternative interventions aimed at undercutting vaccination myths.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Antivaccination activists on the world wide web.

              To determine the likelihood of finding an antivaccination site on the world wide web and to characterise their explicit claims and rhetorical appeals. Using "vaccination" and "immunisation", examining the first 10 sites displayed on seven leading search engines. Detailed examination of content of 100 antivaccination sites found on Google. 43% of websites were antivaccination (all of the first 10 on Google). Main rhetorical appeals involve themes of the scientific veracity of antivaccination argument; rapport with parents seeking to protect their children from harm; and alleged collusion between doctors, the pharmaceutical industry, and government to deny vaccine harm. There is a high probability that parents will encounter elaborate antivaccination material on the world wide web. Factual refutational strategies alone are unlikely to counter the highly rhetorical appeals that shape these sites.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Nellyfournet@yahoo.fr
                +31 30 274 3749 , Liesbeth.Mollema@rivm.nl
                Helma.Ruijs@rivm.nl
                iharmsen@ggd.amsterdam.nl
                keck.fred@gmail.com
                jydurand@yahoo.com
                micunha2@gmail.com
                mariusw@connect.hku.hk
                R.Reis@lumc.nl
                Jeff.french@strategic-social-marketing.org
                E.G.Smit@uva.nl
                Aileen.Kitching@hse.ie
                Jim.van.Steenbergen@rivm.nl
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                30 January 2018
                30 January 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 196
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2208 0118, GRID grid.31147.30, Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), ; Bilthoven, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Municipal Health Service (GGD) Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2112 9282, GRID grid.4444.0, Laboratoire d’anthropologie sociale - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ; Paris, France
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2159 175X, GRID grid.10328.38, Centre for Research in Anthropology, , Universidade do Minho (CRIA - UMinho), ; Braga, Portugal
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1765 4000, GRID grid.440701.6, Department of Public Health at Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, ; Suzhou, China
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Leiden University Medical Centre, ; Leiden, The Netherlands
                [7 ]ISNI 0000000084992262, GRID grid.7177.6, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, , University of Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, GRID grid.7836.a, The Children’s Institute, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [9 ]Strategic Social Marketing, Liphook, UK
                [10 ]ISNI 0000000121073784, GRID grid.12477.37, Brighton University Business School, ; Brighton, UK
                [11 ]ISNI 0000000084992262, GRID grid.7177.6, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, , University of Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [12 ]GRID grid.440338.8, Department of Public Health, Health Service Executive, , St Finbarr’s Hospital, ; Cork, Republic of Ireland
                [13 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Centre for Infectious Diseases, , Leiden University Medical Centre, ; Leiden, The Netherlands
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2208 0118, GRID grid.31147.30, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, ; P.O. Box 1 (internal P.O. Box 75), 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2868-0821
                Article
                5103
                10.1186/s12889-018-5103-8
                5789742
                29378545
                ff4522de-6a41-40f2-b665-5a538094089a
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 July 2017
                : 19 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: This research was funded by the EU FP7-Health–2011 Work Programme as part of work package six of the E-com@eu Consortium Effective Communication in Outbreak Management: International vaccine-resistant group analysis
                Award ID: 278763
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Public health
                under-vaccinated groups,low vaccination coverage,vaccine preventable diseases,attitude regarding vaccination,beliefs vaccine,europe,religion,anthroposophic,roma,irish travellers

                Comments

                Comment on this article