19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Competing‐risks nomograms for predicting cause‐specific mortality in parotid‐gland carcinoma: A population‐based analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Parotid‐gland carcinoma (PGC) is a relatively rare tumor that comprises a group of heterogeneous histologic subtypes. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database to apply a competing‐risks analysis to PGC patients, and then established and validated predictive nomograms for PGC.

          Methods

          Specific screening criteria were applied to identify PGC patients and extract their clinical and other characteristics from the SEER database. We used the cumulative incidence function to estimate the cumulative incidence rates of PGC‐specific death (GCD) and other cause‐specific death (OCD), and tested for differences between groups using Gray's test. We then identified independent prognostic factors by applying the Fine–Gray proportional subdistribution hazard approach, and constructed predictive nomograms based on the results. Calibration curves and the concordance index (C‐index) were employed to validate the nomograms.

          Results

          We finally identified 4,075 eligible PGC patients who had been added to the SEER database from 2004 to 2015. Their 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year cumulative incidence rates of GCD were 10.1%, 21.6%, and 25.7%, respectively, while those of OCD were 2.9%, 6.6%, and 9.0%. Age, race, World Health Organization histologic risk classification, differentiation grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T stage, AJCC N stage, AJCC M stage, and RS (radiotherapy and surgery status) were independent predictors of GCD, while those of OCD were age, sex, marital status, AJCC T stage, AJCC M stage, and RS. These factors were integrated for constructing predictive nomograms. The results for calibration curves and the C‐index suggested that the nomograms were well calibrated and had good discrimination ability.

          Conclusion

          We have used the SEER database to establish—to the best of our knowledge—the first competing‐risks nomograms for predicting the 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year cause‐specific mortality in PGC. The nomograms showed relatively good performance and can be used in clinical practice to assist clinicians in individualized treatment decision‐making.

          Abstract

          Parotid‐gland carcinoma (PGC) is a relatively rare tumor that comprises a group of heterogeneous histologic subtypes. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database to apply a competing‐risks analysis to PGC patients, and then established and validated predictive nomograms for PGC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Practical recommendations for reporting F ine‐ G ray model analyses for competing risk data

            In survival analysis, a competing risk is an event whose occurrence precludes the occurrence of the primary event of interest. Outcomes in medical research are frequently subject to competing risks. In survival analysis, there are 2 key questions that can be addressed using competing risk regression models: first, which covariates affect the rate at which events occur, and second, which covariates affect the probability of an event occurring over time. The cause‐specific hazard model estimates the effect of covariates on the rate at which events occur in subjects who are currently event‐free. Subdistribution hazard ratios obtained from the Fine‐Gray model describe the relative effect of covariates on the subdistribution hazard function. Hence, the covariates in this model can also be interpreted as having an effect on the cumulative incidence function or on the probability of events occurring over time. We conducted a review of the use and interpretation of the Fine‐Gray subdistribution hazard model in articles published in the medical literature in 2015. We found that many authors provided an unclear or incorrect interpretation of the regression coefficients associated with this model. An incorrect and inconsistent interpretation of regression coefficients may lead to confusion when comparing results across different studies. Furthermore, an incorrect interpretation of estimated regression coefficients can result in an incorrect understanding about the magnitude of the association between exposure and the incidence of the outcome. The objective of this article is to clarify how these regression coefficients should be reported and to propose suggestions for interpreting these coefficients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.

              An overview of cancer statistics and trends for selected cancers and all sites combined are given based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Median age at diagnosis for all sites combined shows a 2-year increase from 1974 through 1978 to 1999 through 2003. Changes in cancer incidence rates from 1975 through 2003 are summarized by annual percent change for time periods determined by joinpoint regression analysis. After initial stability (1975-1979), incidence rates in women for all cancer sites combined increased from 1979 through 2003, although the rate of increase has recently slowed. For men, initial increases in all cancer sites combined (1975-1992) are followed by decreasing incidence rates (1992-1995) and stable trends from 1995 through 2003. Female thyroid cancer shows continued increasing incidence rates from 1981 through 2003. Blacks have the highest incidence and mortality rates for men and women for all cancer sites combined. Based on 2001 through 2003 data, the likelihood of developing cancer during one's lifetime is approximately one in two for men and one in three for women. Five-year relative survival for all stages combined (1996-2002) ranges from 16% for lung to 100% for prostate cancer patients. Cancer survival varies by stage of disease and race, with lower survival in blacks compared with whites. The risk of developing subsequent multiple primary cancers varies from 1% for an initial liver primary diagnosis to 16% for initial bladder cancer primaries. The impact on the future U.S. cancer burden is estimated based on the growing and aging U.S. population. The number of new cancer patients is expected to more than double from 1.36 million in 2000 to almost 3.0 million in 2050.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lyujun2020@jnu.edu.cn
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                07 May 2021
                June 2021
                : 10
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v10.11 )
                : 3756-3769
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Clinical Research The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University Guangzhou, Guangdong Province China
                [ 2 ] School of Public Health Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center Xi'an, Shaanxi Province China
                [ 3 ] Center for Evidence‐Based and Translational Medicine Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan, Hubei Province China
                [ 4 ] School of Public Health Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine Xianyang, Shaanxi Province China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jun Lyu, Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People’s Republic of China and School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, People’s Republic of China.

                Email: lyujun2020@ 123456jnu.edu.cn

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-1023
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-2783
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2237-8771
                Article
                CAM43919
                10.1002/cam4.3919
                8178487
                33960711
                fce1fc0f-4a41-4996-bb73-49d13694d517
                © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 March 2021
                : 02 August 2020
                : 09 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 14, Words: 9141
                Funding
                Funded by: The National Social Science Foundation of China
                Award ID: 16BGL183
                Categories
                Original Research
                Cancer Prevention
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:05.06.2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cause‐specific mortality,competing‐risks analysis,nomogram,parotid‐gland carcinoma,seer

                Comments

                Comment on this article