22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intrachromosomal Rearrangements in Rodents from the Perspective of Comparative Region-Specific Painting

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It has long been hypothesized that chromosomal rearrangements play a central role in different evolutionary processes, particularly in speciation and adaptation. Interchromosomal rearrangements have been extensively mapped using chromosome painting. However, intrachromosomal rearrangements have only been described using molecular cytogenetics in a limited number of mammals, including a few rodent species. This situation is unfortunate because intrachromosomal rearrangements are more abundant than interchromosomal rearrangements and probably contain essential phylogenomic information. Significant progress in the detection of intrachromosomal rearrangement is now possible, due to recent advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics. We investigated the level of intrachromosomal rearrangement in the Arvicolinae subfamily, a species-rich taxon characterized by very high rate of karyotype evolution. We made a set of region specific probes by microdissection for a single syntenic region represented by the p-arm of chromosome 1 of Alexandromys oeconomus, and hybridized the probes onto the chromosomes of four arvicolines ( Microtus agrestis, Microtus arvalis, Myodes rutilus, and Dicrostonyx torquatus). These experiments allowed us to show the intrachromosomal rearrangements in the subfamily at a significantly higher level of resolution than previously described. We found a number of paracentric inversions in the karyotypes of M. agrestis and M. rutilus, as well as multiple inversions and a centromere shift in the karyotype of M. arvalis. We propose that during karyotype evolution, arvicolines underwent a significant number of complex intrachromosomal rearrangements that were not previously detected.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

          We study the evolution of inversions that capture locally adapted alleles when two populations are exchanging migrants or hybridizing. By suppressing recombination between the loci, a new inversion can spread. Neither drift nor coadaptation between the alleles (epistasis) is needed, so this local adaptation mechanism may apply to a broader range of genetic and demographic situations than alternative hypotheses that have been widely discussed. The mechanism can explain many features observed in inversion systems. It will drive an inversion to high frequency if there is no countervailing force, which could explain fixed differences observed between populations and species. An inversion can be stabilized at an intermediate frequency if it also happens to capture one or more deleterious recessive mutations, which could explain polymorphisms that are common in some species. This polymorphism can cycle in frequency with the changing selective advantage of the locally favored alleles. The mechanism can establish underdominant inversions that decrease heterokaryotype fitness by several percent if the cause of fitness loss is structural, while if the cause is genic there is no limit to the strength of underdominance that can result. The mechanism is expected to cause loci responsible for adaptive species-specific differences to map to inversions, as seen in recent QTL studies. We discuss data that support the hypothesis, review other mechanisms for inversion evolution, and suggest possible tests.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

              The genome organizations of eight phylogenetically distinct species from five mammalian orders were compared in order to address fundamental questions relating to mammalian chromosomal evolution. Rates of chromosome evolution within mammalian orders were found to increase since the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Nearly 20% of chromosome breakpoint regions were reused during mammalian evolution; these reuse sites are also enriched for centromeres. Analysis of gene content in and around evolutionary breakpoint regions revealed increased gene density relative to the genome-wide average. We found that segmental duplications populate the majority of primate-specific breakpoints and often flank inverted chromosome segments, implicating their role in chromosomal rearrangement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Genes (Basel)
                Genes (Basel)
                genes
                Genes
                MDPI
                2073-4425
                30 August 2017
                September 2017
                : 8
                : 9
                : 215
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; ns3032@ 123456yandex.ru (N.A.S.); polina.perelman@ 123456gmail.com (P.L.P.); graf@ 123456mcb.nsc.ru (A.S.G.)
                [2 ]Synthetic Biological Unit, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
                [3 ]A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; swpavlova@ 123456mail.ru (S.V.P.); bulatova.nina@ 123456gmail.com (N.S.B.)
                [4 ]Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; f_gol@ 123456mail.ru
                [5 ]Department of Biology, Anthropology Laboratories, University of Florence, 50122 Florence, Italy; roscoe.stanyon@ 123456unifi.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: rosa@ 123456mcb.nsc.ru ; Tel.: +7-383-363-9063
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-5209
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-1085
                Article
                genes-08-00215
                10.3390/genes8090215
                5615349
                28867774
                f9798abc-673b-4b2d-b103-1a394c39d123
                © 2017 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 July 2017
                : 23 August 2017
                Categories
                Article

                centromere shift,chromosome painting,comparative cytogenetics,fluorescence in situ hybridization,inversion,microdissection,small mammals,voles

                Comments

                Comment on this article