14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of conflict on maternal and child health service delivery: a country case study of Afghanistan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Since decades, the health system of Afghanistan has been in disarray due to ongoing conflict. We aimed to explore the direct effects of conflict on provision of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and nutrition (RMNCAH&N) services and describe the contextual factors influencing these services.

          Method

          We conducted a quantitative analysis of secondary data on RMNCAH&N indicators and undertook a supportive qualitative study to help understand processes and contextual factors. For quantitative analysis, we stratified the various provinces of Afghanistan into minimal-, moderate- and severe conflict categories based on battle-related deaths from Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) and through accessibility of health services using a Delphi methodology. The coverage of RMNCAH&N indicators across the continuum of care were extracted from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS). The qualitative data was captured by conducting key informant interviews of multi-sectoral stakeholders working in government, NGOs and UN agencies.

          Results

          Comparison of various provinces based on the severity of conflict through Delphi process showed that the mean coverage of various RMNCAH&N indicators including antenatal care (OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.32–0.55), facility delivery (OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.32–0.56), skilled birth attendance (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.33–0.57), DPT3 (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.20–0.33) and oral rehydration therapy (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25–0.55) was significantly lower for severe conflict provinces when compared to minimal conflict provinces. The qualitative analysis identified various factors affecting decision making and service delivery including insecurity, cultural norms, unavailability of workforce, poor monitoring, lack of funds and inconsistent supplies. Other factors include weak stewardship, capacity gap at the central level and poor coordination at national, regional and district level.

          Conclusion

          RMNCAH&N service delivery has been significantly hampered by conflict in Afghanistan over the last several years. This has been further compromised by poor infrastructure, weak stewardship and poor capacity and collaboration at all levels. With the potential of peace and conflict resolution in Afghanistan, we would underscore the importance of continued oversight and integrated implementation of sustainable, grass root RMNCAH&N services with a focus on reaching the most marginalized.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines.

          Although there is debate about the appropriate place of guidelines in clinical practice, guidelines can be seen as one way of assisting clinicians in decision-making. Given the likely diversity of opinion that any group of people may display when considering a topic, methods are needed for organising subjective judgements. Three principal methods (Delphi, nominal group technique, consensus development conference) exist which share the common objective of synthesising judgements when a state of uncertainty exists. To identify the factors that shape and influence the clinical guidelines that emerge from consensus development methods and to make recommendations about best practice in the use of such methods. Five electronic databases were searched: Medline (1966-1996), PsychLIT (1974-1996), Social Science Citation Index (1990-1996), ABI Inform and Sociofile. From the searches and reference lists of articles a total of 177 empirical and review articles were selected for review. The output from consensus development methods may be affected by: the way the task is set (choice of cues, recognition of contextual cues, the focus of the task, the comprehensiveness of the scenarios); the selection of participants (choice of individuals, degree of homogeneity of the group, their background, their number); the selection and presentation of scientific information (format, extent to which its quality and content is assessed); the way any interaction is structured (number of rating rounds, ensuring equitable participation, physical environment for meetings); and the method of synthesising individual judgements (definition of agreement, rules governing outliers, method of mathematical aggregation). Although a considerable amount of research has been carried out, many aspects have not been investigated sufficiently. For the time being at least, advice on those aspects has, therefore, to be based on the user's own commonsense and the experience of those who have used or participated in these methods. Even in the long term, some aspects will not be amenable to scientific study. Meanwhile, adherence to best practice will enhance the validity, reliability and impact of the clinical guidelines produced.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Delphi technique: A review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Afghanistan's Basic Package of Health Services: Its development and effects on rebuilding the health system

              In 2001, Afghanistan's Ministry of Public Health inherited a devastated health system and some of the worst health statistics in the world. The health system was rebuilt based on the Basic Package of Health Services (BPHS). This paper examines why the BPHS was needed, how it was developed, its content and the changes resulting from the rebuilding. The methods used for assessing change were to review health outcome and health system indicator changes from 2004 to 2011 structured along World Health Organisation's six building blocks of health system strengthening. BPHS implementation contributed to success in improving health status by translating policy and strategy into practical interventions, focusing health services on priority health problems, clearly defining the services to be delivered at different service levels and helped the Ministry to exert its stewardship role. BPHS was expanded nationwide by contracting out its provision of services to non-governmental organisations. As a result, access to and utilisation of primary health care services in rural areas increased dramatically because the number of BPHS facilities more than doubled; access for women to basic health care improved; more deliveries were attended by skilled personnel; supply of essential medicines increased; and the health information system became more functional.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                shafiq.mirzazada@aku.edu
                zahra.feroz@aku.edu
                sultana.jabeen@hotmail.com
                malika.fatima78687@gmail.com
                arjumand.rizvi@aku.edu
                uzair.ansari@aku.edu
                jai.das@aku.edu
                zulfiqar.bhutta@sickkids.ca
                Journal
                Confl Health
                Confl Health
                Conflict and Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1752-1505
                10 June 2020
                10 June 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 38
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Academic Projects Afghanistan, Aga Khan University, Kabul, Afghanistan
                [2 ]GRID grid.7147.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0633 6224, Division of Women and Child Health, , Aga Khan University, ; Karachi, Pakistan
                [3 ]GRID grid.7147.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0633 6224, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, , Aga Khan University, ; Karachi, Pakistan
                [4 ]GRID grid.7147.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0633 6224, Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, , Aga Khan University, ; Karachi, Pakistan
                [5 ]GRID grid.42327.30, ISNI 0000 0004 0473 9646, Centre for Global Child Health, , The Hospital for Sick Children, ; 686 Bay Street, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4 Canada
                Article
                285
                10.1186/s13031-020-00285-x
                7288441
                32536966
                f895b310-5a5a-403c-ba47-3a6e9c0c9dc7
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 21 May 2019
                : 2 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013323, Family Larsson‐Rosenquist Foundation;
                Award ID: 51708
                Funded by: International Development Research Centre
                Award ID: 108416-002 & 108640-001
                Funded by: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation
                Award ID: QZA-16/0395
                Funded by: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
                Award ID: OPP1171560
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006641, UNICEF;
                Award ID: PCA 20181204
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Health & Social care
                conflict,humanitarian,afghanistan,maternal health,child health,nutrition
                Health & Social care
                conflict, humanitarian, afghanistan, maternal health, child health, nutrition

                Comments

                Comment on this article