1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Limited underthrusting of India below Tibet: 3He/ 4He analysis of thermal springs locates the mantle suture in continental collision

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Our regional-scale geochemical dataset ( 3He/ 4He) resolves the geometry of the continental collision between India and Asia. Geophysical images have led to contradictory interpretations that India directly underthrusts Tibet as a horizontal plate or India subducts steeply into the mantle. Helium transits from mantle depths to the surface within a few millennia, such that the ratio of mantle-derived 3He to dominantly crust-derived 4He provides a snapshot of the subsurface. 3He/ 4He data from 225 geothermal springs across a >1,000-km-wide region of southern Tibet define a sharp boundary subparallel to the surface suture between India and Asia, just north of the Himalaya, delineating the northern limit of India at ∼80-km depth. The India–Asia collision resembles oceanic subduction with an asthenospheric mantle wedge.

          Abstract

          During continent–continent collision, does the downgoing continental plate underplate far inboard of the collisional boundary or does it subduct steeply into the mantle, and how is this geometry manifested in the mantle flow field? We test conflicting models for these questions for Earth’s archetypal continental collision forming the Himalaya and Tibetan Plateau. Air-corrected helium isotope data ( 3He/ 4He) from 225 geothermal springs (196 from our group, 29 from the literature) delineate a boundary separating a Himalayan domain of only crustal helium from a Tibetan domain with significant mantle helium. This 1,000-km-long boundary is located close to the Yarlung-Zangbo Suture (YZS) in southern Tibet from 80 to 92°E and is interpreted to overlie the “mantle suture” where cold underplated Indian lithosphere is juxtaposed at >80 km depth against a sub-Tibetan incipiently molten asthenospheric mantle wedge. In southeastern Tibet, the mantle suture lies 100 km south of the YZS, implying delamination of the mantle lithosphere from the Indian crust. This helium-isotopic boundary helps resolve multiple, mutually conflicting seismological interpretations. Our synthesis of the combined data locates the northern limit of Indian underplating beneath Tibet, where the Indian plate bends to steeper dips or breaks off beneath a (likely thin) asthenospheric wedge below Tibetan crust, thereby defining limited underthrusting for the Tibetan continental collision.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Velocities and propagation characteristics of Pn and Sn beneath the Himalayan arc and Tibetan plateau: Possible evidence for underthrusting of Indian continental lithosphere beneath Tibet

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Subduction of the Indian lithosphere beneath the Tibetan Plateau and Burma

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales

              Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have enhanced energy production but raised concerns about drinking-water contamination and other environmental impacts. Identifying the sources and mechanisms of contamination can help improve the environmental and economic sustainability of shale-gas extraction. We analyzed 113 and 20 samples from drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales, respectively, examining hydrocarbon abundance and isotopic compositions (e.g., C2H6/CH4, δ(13)C-CH4) and providing, to our knowledge, the first comprehensive analyses of noble gases and their isotopes (e.g., (4)He, (20)Ne, (36)Ar) in groundwater near shale-gas wells. We addressed two questions. (i) Are elevated levels of hydrocarbon gases in drinking-water aquifers near gas wells natural or anthropogenic? (ii) If fugitive gas contamination exists, what mechanisms cause it? Against a backdrop of naturally occurring salt- and gas-rich groundwater, we identified eight discrete clusters of fugitive gas contamination, seven in Pennsylvania and one in Texas that showed increased contamination through time. Where fugitive gas contamination occurred, the relative proportions of thermogenic hydrocarbon gas (e.g., CH4, (4)He) were significantly higher (P < 0.01) and the proportions of atmospheric gases (air-saturated water; e.g., N2, (36)Ar) were significantly lower (P < 0.01) relative to background groundwater. Noble gas isotope and hydrocarbon data link four contamination clusters to gas leakage from intermediate-depth strata through failures of annulus cement, three to target production gases that seem to implicate faulty production casings, and one to an underground gas well failure. Noble gas data appear to rule out gas contamination by upward migration from depth through overlying geological strata triggered by horizontal drilling or hydraulic fracturing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                18 March 2022
                22 March 2022
                18 March 2022
                : 119
                : 12
                : e2113877119
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Geophysics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305;
                [2] bKey Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100101, China;
                [3] cSchool of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210;
                [4] dDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque, NM 87131;
                [5] eScripps Institution of Oceanography , La Jolla, CA 92093
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: sklemp@ 123456stanford.edu or zhaoping@ 123456itpcas.ac.cn .

                Edited by Barbara Romanowicz, University of California, Berkeley, CA; received July 27, 2021; accepted February 9, 2022

                Author contributions: S.L.K. designed research; S.L.K., P.Z., T.H.D., L.J.C., and K.E.K. led seismic, field, noble-gas, geochemical and tectonic analysis; S.L.K., P.Z., L.J.C., K.E.K., T.L., and C.W. did fieldwork; S.L.K., P.Z., and L.D. managed logistics; P.Z., C.J.W., T.H.D., L.J.C., and D.R.H. did geochemical analysis; and S.L.K., P.Z., T.H.D., L.J.C., K.E.K., and T.L. did tectonic interpretation and wrote the paper.

                2Present address: Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185.

                3Deceased January 7, 2018.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-1829
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-1720
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6237-8023
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-2939
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3266-3963
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-9613
                Article
                202113877
                10.1073/pnas.2113877119
                8944758
                35302884
                f6ea8cdd-4d32-4092-8de6-cc00881492fb
                Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 09 February 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Exploration and Research Program
                Award ID: 2019QZKK0804
                Award Recipient : Simon L. Klemperer Award Recipient : Ping Zhao Award Recipient : Lin Ding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) 100000001
                Award ID: 1627930
                Award Recipient : Simon L. Klemperer Award Recipient : Laura J Crossey Award Recipient : Karl Karlstrom
                Funded by: Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
                Award ID: XDA20070300
                Award Recipient : Simon L. Klemperer Award Recipient : Ping Zhao Award Recipient : Lin Ding
                Funded by: National Geographic Society 100006363
                Award ID: 9719-15
                Award Recipient : Simon L. Klemperer
                Funded by: Stanford University International Office
                Award ID: N/A
                Award Recipient : Simon L. Klemperer Award Recipient : Ping Zhao Award Recipient : Lin Ding
                Categories
                413
                Physical Sciences
                Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences

                continental collision,tibetan plateau,mantle helium,structural seismology,indian lithosphere

                Comments

                Comment on this article