8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reported Cases of End-Stage Kidney Disease — United States, 2000–2019

      research-article
      , MPH 1 , , , ScD 1 , , MD, PhD 1
      Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (kidney failure requiring dialysis or transplantation) is a costly and disabling condition that often results in premature death (1). During 2019, Medicare fee-for-service expenditures for ESKD were $37.3 billion, accounting for approximately 7% of Medicare paid claims costs (1). Diabetes and hypertension remain the leading causes of ESKD, accounting for 47% and 29%, respectively, of patients who began ESKD treatment in 2019 (1). Compared with White persons, Black, Hispanic, and American Indian or Alaska Native persons are more likely to develop ESKD (1, 2 ) and to have diagnosed diabetes ( 3 ). After declining for more than a decade, the incidence rate of ESKD with diabetes reported as the primary cause (ESKD from diabetes) has leveled off since 2010 (1, 4 ). Further, after increasing for many years, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes has also leveled off ( 4 ). Although these flattening trends in rates are important from a population perspective, the trend in the number of ESKD cases is important from a health systems resources perspective. Using United States Renal Data System (USRDS) 2000–2019 data, CDC examined trends in the number of incident and prevalent ESKD cases by demographic characteristics and by primary cause of ESKD. During 2000–2019, the number of incident ESKD cases increased by 41.8%, and the number of prevalent ESKD cases increased by 118.7%. Higher percentage changes in both incident and prevalent ESKD cases were among Asian, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander persons and among cases with hypertension or diabetes as the primary cause. Interventions to improve care and better manage ESKD risk factors among persons with diabetes and hypertension, along with increased use of therapeutic agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors shown to have kidney-protective benefits ( 5 , 6 ) might slow the increase and eventually reverse the trend in incident ESKD cases. USRDS collects, analyzes, and distributes ESKD clinical and claims data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medical Evidence Report form (CMS 2728), which includes sociodemographic characteristics, the date patients were first treated for ESKD, and the primary cause of ESKD. The Medicare program covers 80% of the cost of ESKD treatment for beneficiaries in the United States regardless of age (1). Kidney care providers are required to complete the CMS 2728 form for each new patient with ESKD, regardless of Medicare eligibility status. Using USRDS 2000–2019 data, CDC examined the number of incident and prevalent ESKD cases in the United States each year during 2000–2019 by demographic characteristics (i.e., age, sex, and race/ethnicity) and by primary cause (i.e., diabetes, hypertension, or other cause). This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.* During 2000 and 2019, for both incident and prevalent ESKD cases, 34.9%–42.3% occurred among persons aged 45–64 years, 53.4%–-58.3% occurred among males, and 44.7%–55.2% occurred among White persons (Table). During 2000–2019, the number of incident ESKD cases increased 41.8%, from 92,660 to 131,422 (Table) (Figure 1), and the number of prevalent cases increased 118.7%, from 358,247 to 783,594 (Table) (Figure 2). Larger increases among incident cases occurred among Asian (149.5%), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (96.5%), and Hispanic (84.0%) persons (Table). Similarly, larger increases among prevalent cases were also observed among these populations. Smaller percentage increases in both incident and prevalent cases were observed among persons aged <45 years and among American Indian or Alaska Native persons. Although diabetes was the primary cause for a larger percentage of incident and prevalent ESKD cases, the largest increase in incident and prevalent cases was among patients with hypertension reported as the primary cause. TABLE Number of reported incident and prevalent cases of end-stage kidney disease, by selected characteristics — United States, 2000 and 2019* Characteristic Incident cases Prevalent cases 2000 2019 Percentagechange 2000 2019 Percentage change No. (%)† No. (%)† No. (%)† No. (%)† Total 92,660 (100.0) 131,422 (100.0) 41.8 358,247 (100.0) 783,594 (100.0) 118.7 Age group, yrs <45 14,194 (15.3) 16,230 (12.3) 14.3 87,769 (24.5) 118,208 (15.1) 34.7 45–64 32,370 (34.9) 48,874 (37.2) 51.0 144,703 (40.4) 331,220 (42.3) 128.9 65–74 23,494 (25.4) 35,744 (27.2) 52.1 71,825 (20.0) 199,005 (25.4) 177.1 ≥75 22,602 (24.4) 30,574 (23.3) 35.3 53,950 (15.1) 135,161 (17.2) 150.5 Sex Men 49,500 (53.4) 76,631 (58.3) 54.8 195,216 (54.5) 456,821 (58.3) 134.0 Women 43,160 (46.6) 54,791 (41.7) 26.9 163,031 (45.5) 326,773 (41.7) 100.4 Race and Ethnicity White 51,156 (55.2) 67,919 (51.7) 32.8 180,636 (50.4) 349,596 (44.7) 93.5 Black 25,917 (28.0) 33,700 (25.6) 30.0 116,376 (32.5) 234,399 (29.9) 101.4 Hispanic 11,297 (12.2) 20,790 (15.8) 84.0 42,129 (11.8) 140,961 (18.0) 234.6 Asian 2,507 (2.7) 6,256 (4.8) 149.5 11,839 (3.3) 41,393 (5.3) 249.6 American Indian or Alaska Native 1,041 (1.1) 1,299 (1.0) 24.8 4,538 (1.3) 7,949 (1.0) 75.2 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 742 (0.8) 1,458 (1.1) 96.5 2,729 (0.8) 9,296 (1.2) 240.6 Primary cause Diabetes 41,458 (44.7) 61,522 (46.8) 48.4 129,699 (36.2) 307,385 (39.2) 137.0 Hypertension 23,384 (25.2) 37,539 (28.6) 60.5 83,553 (23.3) 209,437 (26.7) 150.7 Other cause 27,818 (30.0) 32,361 (24.6) 16.3 144,995 (40.5) 266,772 (34.0) 84.0 * Data from United States Renal Data System, 2021 Annual Data Report, Reference Tables. https://adr.usrds.org/2021/reference-tables † Percentages might not sum to 100% because of rounding. FIGURE 1 Number of reported incident cases of end-stage kidney disease, by primary cause — United States, 2000–2019* * Data from United States Renal Data System, 2021 Annual Data Report, Reference Tables. https://adr.usrds.org/2021/reference-tables This figure is a histogram showing the number of reported incident cases of end-stage kidney disease by primary cause in the United States during 2000–2019. FIGURE 2 Number of reported prevalent cases of end-stage kidney disease, by primary cause — United States, 2000–2019* * Data from United States Renal Data System, 2021 Annual Data Report, Reference Tables. https://adr.usrds.org/2021/reference-tables This figure is a histogram showing the number of reported prevalent cases of end-stage kidney disease by primary cause in the United States during 2000–2019. Discussion During 2000–2019, in the general U.S. population, the number of reported incident ESKD cases increased 41.8%, and the number of prevalent cases approximately doubled. Although persons aged 45–64 years, males, White persons, and persons with ESKD from diabetes accounted for the larger percentage of cases, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, Hispanic persons, and persons with ESKD from hypertension experienced the larger increase in cases. Compared with White persons, these racial/ethnic populations together with American Indian or Alaska Native and Black persons are disproportionately affected by ESKD (1). The continued increase in the number of ESKD cases will increase strain on the health care system and lead to higher costs. Effective management of diabetes and hypertension can help prevent ESKD and decrease the number of incident cases, thus alleviating the burden on the health care system and reducing costs. Managing risk factors such as diabetes and high blood pressure and treatment with ACE inhibitors or ARBs have been shown to help prevent or delay the onset of ESKD from diabetes ( 5 , 7 ). In persons with diabetes, ACE inhibitors and ARBs lower blood pressure, reduce albuminuria, and slow the decline in kidney function ( 5 ). Other agents such as SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risks for cardiovascular disease and progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, in addition to lowering blood glucose ( 6 ). However, the number of patients with newly treated ESKD from diabetes is likely to continue to increase with the increasing number of persons with diagnosed diabetes ( 4 ). Compared with White persons, Black, Hispanic, and American Indian or Alaska Native persons are approximately two to three times as likely to develop ESKD (1, 2 ). However, growth in incident and prevalent cases in the American Indian or Alaska Native population was slower than that in other populations. Population health and team-based approaches to diabetes care, including kidney disease testing and case management, implemented by the Indian Health Service, tribal and urban Indian health facilities, and supported by the Special Diabetes Program for Indians were associated with an estimated Medicare savings as high as $520.4 million in ESKD cases averted ( 8 ). This program might explain the lower percentage change in ESKD cases during 2000–2019. Expansion of these programs to other populations could reduce morbidity and save costs. In addition, interventions to promote and increase use of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and SGLT2 inhibitors, along with improving care and better managing ESKD risk factors among persons with diabetes, might slow the increase and eventually reverse the trend in incident ESKD cases. ESKD will continue to have a large impact on the U.S. health care system with population growth, aging, high prevalence of ESKD risk factors such as diabetes, better survival of the ESKD population, and improved transplant outcomes (1, 3 , 4 ). Although the mortality rate in kidney transplant patients is three times lower compared with patients on dialysis (1), transplant recipients accounted for 3.0% of the incident and 29.6% of the prevalent ESKD cases in 2019. Further, annual transplant rates in this population declined somewhat during 2000–2019 (1). Several government agencies and nongovernmental organizations have implemented initiatives to increase access to kidney transplants and promote transplantation ( 9 ). In addition, CMS extended Medicare coverage of immunosuppressive drugs from 36 months to the lifetime of the kidney transplant recipient, preventing the return of transplant patients to dialysis. This extension of coverage is expected to save Medicare $400 million over 10 years ( 10 ). Whereas these factors collectively might result in the continued growth of the ESKD population, with better management of ESKD, patients can live a healthier life at a reduced cost to the health care system. The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, data on ESKD treatment were based on reports to CMS; patients whose treatment was not reported to CMS (e.g., persons who refused treatment or died from ESKD before receiving treatment) were not included. Second, the primary cause of ESKD was obtained from the CMS Medical Evidence Report and was based on a physician’s assessment of the patient, which could be influenced by the physician’s awareness of a diabetes or hypertension diagnosis and not reflect the true cause of ESKD. Finally, differential classification of race or ethnicity in the CMS Medical Evidence Form could result in overcount or undercount of the actual number of ESKD cases in racial- or ethnic-specific groups. One of the goals of the Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is to reduce the number of Americans developing ESKD by 25% by 2030 ( 9 ). Effective management of diabetes and hypertension, including kidney disease testing and management as part of diabetes care in at-risk populations, can help prevent ESKD. Monitoring trends and racial or ethnic disparity gaps in ESKD, and tracking other factors such as kidney disease awareness, pre-ESKD care, and risk factor (e.g., diabetes or hypertension) control and prevention, will be very important to evaluate the success of these interventions. Continued efforts to address ESKD risk factors to prevent or delay ESKD onset could stabilize or reverse the increase in the number of persons living with ESKD. Summary What is already known about this topic? End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (kidney failure requiring dialysis or transplantation) is a disabling condition that often results in premature death. ESKD is costly, accounting for $37.3 billion of Medicare expenditures during 2019. What is added by this report? During 2000–2019, the number of ESKD cases reported in the United States increased 41.8%; the number of prevalent cases approximately doubled. Higher percentage changes in incident and prevalent ESKD cases were attributable to primary causes related to diabetes and hypertension. What are the implications for public health practice? Effective management of diabetes and hypertension can help prevent ESKD and decrease the number of incident cases, thus reducing costs and alleviating the impact on the health care system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study.

          To determine the relation between exposure to glycaemia over time and the risk of macrovascular or microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Prospective observational study. 23 hospital based clinics in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. 4585 white, Asian Indian, and Afro-Caribbean UKPDS patients, whether randomised or not to treatment, were included in analyses of incidence; of these, 3642 were included in analyses of relative risk. Primary predefined aggregate clinical outcomes: any end point or deaths related to diabetes and all cause mortality. Secondary aggregate outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation (including death from peripheral vascular disease), and microvascular disease (predominantly retinal photo-coagulation). Single end points: non-fatal heart failure and cataract extraction. Risk reduction associated with a 1% reduction in updated mean HbA(1c) adjusted for possible confounders at diagnosis of diabetes. The incidence of clinical complications was significantly associated with glycaemia. Each 1% reduction in updated mean HbA(1c) was associated with reductions in risk of 21% for any end point related to diabetes (95% confidence interval 17% to 24%, P<0.0001), 21% for deaths related to diabetes (15% to 27%, P<0.0001), 14% for myocardial infarction (8% to 21%, P<0.0001), and 37% for microvascular complications (33% to 41%, P<0.0001). No threshold of risk was observed for any end point. In patients with type 2 diabetes the risk of diabetic complications was strongly associated with previous hyperglycaemia. Any reduction in HbA(1c) is likely to reduce the risk of complications, with the lowest risk being in those with HbA(1c) values in the normal range (<6.0%).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis: effect of monotherapy and combination therapy with inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system on proteinuria in renal disease.

              Reduction of proteinuria is associated with delayed progression of chronic kidney disease. Reports suggest that angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce proteinuria, but results are variable. The relative effect of ARBs and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and their combined administration, remains uncertain. To establish the effect of ARBs versus placebo and alternative treatments, and the effect of combined treatment with ARBs and ACE inhibitors, on proteinuria. English-language studies in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 1990 to September 2006), reference lists, and expert contacts. Randomized trials of ARBs versus placebo, ACE inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, or the combination of ARBs and ACE inhibitors in patients with or without diabetes and with microalbuminuria or proteinuria for whom data were available on urinary protein excretion at baseline and at 1 to 12 months. Two investigators independently searched and abstracted studies. Forty-nine studies involving 6181 participants reported results of 72 comparisons with 1 to 4 months of follow-up and 38 comparisons with 5 to 12 months of follow-up. The ARBs reduced proteinuria compared with placebo or calcium-channel blockers over 1 to 4 months (ratio of means, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.68] and 0.69 [CI, 0.62 to 0.77], respectively) and 5 to 12 months (ratio of means, 0.66 [CI, 0.63 to 0.69] and 0.62 [CI, 0.55 to 0.70], respectively). The ARBs and ACE inhibitors reduced proteinuria to a similar degree. The combination of ARBs and ACE inhibitors further reduced proteinuria more than either agent alone: The ratio of means for combination therapy versus ARBs was 0.76 (CI, 0.68 to 0.85) over 1 to 4 months and 0.75 (CI, 0.61 to 0.92) over 5 to 12 months; for combination therapy versus ACE inhibitors, the ratio of means was 0.78 (CI, 0.72 to 0.84) over 1 to 4 months and 0.82 (CI, 0.67 to 1.01) over 5 to 12 months. The antiproteinuric effect was consistent across subgroups. Most studies were small, varied in quality, and did not provide reliable data on adverse drug reactions. Proteinuria reduction is only a surrogate for important progression of renal failure. The ARBs reduce proteinuria, independent of the degree of proteinuria and of underlying disease. The magnitude of effect is similar regardless of whether the comparator is placebo or calcium-channel blocker. Reduction in proteinuria from ARBs and ACE inhibitors is similar, but their combination is more effective than either drug alone. Uncertainty concerning adverse effects and outcomes that are important to patients limits applicability of findings to clinical practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                18 March 2022
                18 March 2022
                : 71
                : 11
                : 412-415
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Nilka Ríos Burrows, nrios@ 123456cdc.gov , 770-488-1057.
                Article
                mm7111a3
                10.15585/mmwr.mm7111a3
                8942306
                35298452
                f6ced212-2bf6-4fe8-b682-81eb9d4e29df

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article