26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Topological Data Analysis as a Morphometric Method: Using Persistent Homology to Demarcate a Leaf Morphospace

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 3 , 2 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 7 , 3 , 11 , 7 , 12 , 13 , 11 , 14 , 13 , 15 , 2 , 2 , 5 , 16 , 4 , 1 , 8 , 7 , 7 , 2 , 17 , 18 , 19 , *
      Frontiers in Plant Science
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      leaf shape, leaves, morphology, shape, topology, topological data analysis, persistent homology, morphometrics

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Current morphometric methods that comprehensively measure shape cannot compare the disparate leaf shapes found in seed plants and are sensitive to processing artifacts. We explore the use of persistent homology, a topological method applied as a filtration across simplicial complexes (or more simply, a method to measure topological features of spaces across different spatial resolutions), to overcome these limitations. The described method isolates subsets of shape features and measures the spatial relationship of neighboring pixel densities in a shape. We apply the method to the analysis of 182,707 leaves, both published and unpublished, representing 141 plant families collected from 75 sites throughout the world. By measuring leaves from throughout the seed plants using persistent homology, a defined morphospace comparing all leaves is demarcated. Clear differences in shape between major phylogenetic groups are detected and estimates of leaf shape diversity within plant families are made. The approach predicts plant family above chance. The application of a persistent homology method, using topological features, to measure leaf shape allows for a unified morphometric framework to measure plant form, including shapes, textures, patterns, and branching architectures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Barcodes: The persistent topology of data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Momocs: Outline Analysis UsingR

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Correlations of climate and plant ecology to leaf size and shape: potential proxies for the fossil record.

              The sizes and shapes (physiognomy) of fossil leaves are widely applied as proxies for paleoclimatic and paleoecological variables. However, significant improvements to leaf-margin analysis, used for nearly a century to reconstruct mean annual temperature (MAT), have been elusive; also, relationships between physiognomy and many leaf ecological variables have not been quantified. Using the recently developed technique of digital leaf physiognomy, correlations of leaf physiognomy to MAT, leaf mass per area, and nitrogen content are quantified for a set of test sites from North and Central America. Many physiognomic variables correlate significantly with MAT, indicating a coordinated, convergent evolutionary response of fewer teeth, smaller tooth area, and lower degree of blade dissection in warmer environments. In addition, tooth area correlates negatively with leaf mass per area and positively with nitrogen content. Multiple linear regressions based on a subset of variables produce more accurate MAT estimates than leaf-margin analysis (standard errors of ±2 vs. ±3°C); improvements are greatest at sites with shallow water tables that are analogous to many fossil sites. The multivariate regressions remain robust even when based on one leaf per species, and the model most applicable to fossils shows no more signal degradation from leaf fragmentation than leaf-margin analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                25 April 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 553
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Donald Danforth Plant Science Center , St. Louis, MO, United States
                [2] 2Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO, United States
                [3] 3Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University , Ames, IA, United States
                [4] 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University , New Haven, CT, United States
                [5] 5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University , Providence, RI, United States
                [6] 6National Center for Genome Resources (NCGR) , Santa Fe, NM, United States
                [7] 7Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, NC, United States
                [8] 8Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis , Davis, CA, United States
                [9] 9Vegetable Crops Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) , Madison, WI, United States
                [10] 10Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI, United States
                [11] 11Department of Biology, Saint Louis University , St. Louis, MO, United States
                [12] 12Grape Genetics Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) , Geneva, NY, United States
                [13] 13Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University , Truro, NS, Canada
                [14] 14Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities , St. Paul, MN, United States
                [15] 15Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa , Viçosa, Brazil
                [16] 16American Museum of Natural History , New York, NY, United States
                [17] 17Independent Researcher , Santa Rosa, CA, United States
                [18] 18Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI, United States
                [19] 19Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Verónica S. Di Stilio, University of Washington, United States

                Reviewed by: Raffaele Dello Ioio, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy; Tatiana Arias, Comparative Biology Laboratory, Colombia

                *Correspondence: Daniel H. Chitwood, chitwoo9@ 123456msu.edu ; dhchitwood@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Plant Evolution and Development, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2018.00553
                5996898
                29922307
                f5e13d42-cef4-473d-9538-f188f01bfaee
                Copyright © 2018 Li, An, Angelovici, Bagaza, Batushansky, Clark, Coneva, Donoghue, Edwards, Fajardo, Fang, Frank, Gallaher, Gebken, Hill, Jansky, Kaur, Klahs, Klein, Kuraparthy, Londo, Migicovsky, Miller, Mohn, Myles, Otoni, Pires, Rieffer, Schmerler, Spriggs, Topp, Van Deynze, Zhang, Zhu, Zink and Chitwood.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 08 February 2018
                : 09 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Equations: 2, References: 43, Pages: 14, Words: 0
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                leaf shape,leaves,morphology,shape,topology,topological data analysis,persistent homology,morphometrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article