62
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Designing prevention programmes to reduce incidence of dementia: prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To estimate the percentage reduction in incidence of dementia that would be obtained if specific risk factors were eliminated.

          Design Prospective seven year cohort study.

          Setting General population, Montpellier, France.

          Participants 1433 people aged over 65 with a mean baseline age of 72.5 (SD 5.1) years.

          Main outcome measures Diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia established by a standardised neurological examination.

          Results Cox models were constructed to derive hazard ratios and determine confounding and interaction effects for potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia. Mean percentage population attributable fractions were calculated with 95% confidence intervals derived from bootstrapping for seven year incidence of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. The final model retained crystallised intelligence (population attributable fraction 18.11%, 95% confidence interval 10.91% to 25.42%), depression (10.31%, 3.66% to 17.17%), fruit and vegetable consumption (6.46%, 0.15% to 13.06%), diabetes (4.88%, 1.87% to 7.98%), and apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (7.11%, 2.44% to 11.98%).

          Conclusions Increasing crystallised intelligence and fruit and vegetable consumption and eliminating depression and diabetes are likely to have the biggest impact on reducing the incidence of dementia, outweighing even the effect of removing the principal known genetic risk factor. Although causal relations cannot be concluded with certainty, the study suggests priorities that may inform public health programmes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Use and misuse of population attributable fractions.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparative quantification of health risks: Conceptual framework and methodological issues

            Reliable and comparable analysis of risks to health is key for preventing disease and injury. Causal attribution of morbidity and mortality to risk factors has traditionally been conducted in the context of methodological traditions of individual risk factors, often in a limited number of settings, restricting comparability. In this paper, we discuss the conceptual and methodological issues for quantifying the population health effects of individual or groups of risk factors in various levels of causality using knowledge from different scientific disciplines. The issues include: comparing the burden of disease due to the observed exposure distribution in a population with the burden from a hypothetical distribution or series of distributions, rather than a single reference level such as non-exposed; considering the multiple stages in the causal network of interactions among risk factor(s) and disease outcome to allow making inferences about some combinations of risk factors for which epidemiological studies have not been conducted, including the joint effects of multiple risk factors; calculating the health loss due to risk factor(s) as a time-indexed "stream" of disease burden due to a time-indexed "stream" of exposure, including consideration of discounting; and the sources of uncertainty.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              CIRCULATION

              SS Chugh (1964)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: senior research director
                Role: research fellow
                Role: consultant psychiatrist
                Role: research director
                Role: research fellow
                Role: research director
                Journal
                BMJ
                bmj
                BMJ : British Medical Journal
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1468-5833
                2010
                2010
                05 August 2010
                : 341
                : c3885
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Inserm, U888 Nervous System Pathologies: Epidemiological and Clinical Research, La Colombière Hospital, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
                [2 ]Université de Montpellier 1, Montpellier, F-34000, France
                [3 ]Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: K Ritchie  karen.ritchie@ 123456inserm.fr
                Article
                ritk750018
                10.1136/bmj.c3885
                2917002
                20688841
                f5d7216f-92e0-4d3a-a728-83eb6afa8419
                © Ritchie et al 2010

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 14 June 2010
                Categories
                Research
                Epidemiologic Studies
                Molecular Genetics
                Memory Disorders (Neurology)
                Memory Disorders (Psychiatry)
                Diabetes

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article