7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Deep-learning seismic full-waveform inversion for realistic structural models

      1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 4
      GEOPHYSICS
      Society of Exploration Geophysicists

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Velocity model inversion is one of the most important tasks in seismic exploration. Full-waveform inversion (FWI) can obtain the highest resolution in traditional velocity inversion methods, but it heavily depends on initial models and is computationally expensive. In recent years, a large number of deep-learning (DL)-based velocity model inversion methods have been proposed. One critical component in those DL-based methods is a large training set containing different velocity models. We have developed a method to construct a realistic structural model for the DL network. Our compressional-wave velocity model building method for creating dense-layer/fault/salt body models can automatically construct a large number of models without much human effort, which is very meaningful for DL networks. Moreover, to improve the inversion result on these realistic structural models, instead of only using the common-shot gather, we also extract features from the common-receiver gather as well. Through a large number of realistic structural models, reasonable data acquisition methods, and appropriate network setups, a more generalized result can be obtained through our proposed inversion framework, which has been demonstrated to be effective on the independent testing data set. The results of dense-layer models, fault models, and salt body models that we compared and analyzed demonstrate the reliability of our method and also provide practical guidelines for choosing optimal inversion strategies in realistic situations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Deep learning.

          Deep learning allows computational models that are composed of multiple processing layers to learn representations of data with multiple levels of abstraction. These methods have dramatically improved the state-of-the-art in speech recognition, visual object recognition, object detection and many other domains such as drug discovery and genomics. Deep learning discovers intricate structure in large data sets by using the backpropagation algorithm to indicate how a machine should change its internal parameters that are used to compute the representation in each layer from the representation in the previous layer. Deep convolutional nets have brought about breakthroughs in processing images, video, speech and audio, whereas recurrent nets have shone light on sequential data such as text and speech.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks

            Skin cancer, the most common human malignancy, is primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy and histopathological examination. Automated classification of skin lesions using images is a challenging task owing to the fine-grained variability in the appearance of skin lesions. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for general and highly variable tasks across many fine-grained object categories. Here we demonstrate classification of skin lesions using a single CNN, trained end-to-end from images directly, using only pixels and disease labels as inputs. We train a CNN using a dataset of 129,450 clinical images—two orders of magnitude larger than previous datasets—consisting of 2,032 different diseases. We test its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical images with two critical binary classification use cases: keratinocyte carcinomas versus benign seborrheic keratoses; and malignant melanomas versus benign nevi. The first case represents the identification of the most common cancers, the second represents the identification of the deadliest skin cancer. The CNN achieves performance on par with all tested experts across both tasks, demonstrating an artificial intelligence capable of classifying skin cancer with a level of competence comparable to dermatologists. Outfitted with deep neural networks, mobile devices can potentially extend the reach of dermatologists outside of the clinic. It is projected that 6.3 billion smartphone subscriptions will exist by the year 2021 (ref. 13) and can therefore potentially provide low-cost universal access to vital diagnostic care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Learning representations by back-propagating errors

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                GEOPHYSICS
                GEOPHYSICS
                Society of Exploration Geophysicists
                0016-8033
                1942-2156
                January 01 2021
                January 01 2021
                : 86
                : 1
                : R31-R44
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Shandong University, School of Qilu Transportation, Jinan, Shandong Province 250061, China, Shandong University, Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Jinan, Shandong Province 250061, China, and Shandong University, Data Science Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province 250061, China..
                [2 ]Shandong University, School of Qilu Transportation, Jinan, Shandong Province 250061, China.(corresponding author).
                [3 ]Shandong University, Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250061, China..
                [4 ]Zhejiang University, School of Earth Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310027, China..
                Article
                10.1190/geo2019-0435.1
                f3b5f57e-322e-4646-a562-b41e6587c2c3
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article