15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Developmental Coordination Disorder and Its Association With Developmental Comorbidities at 6.5 Years in Apparently Healthy Children Born Extremely Preterm

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 7 , 3 , 8
      JAMA Pediatrics
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e313">Question</h5> <p id="d806118e315">How common are motor impairments that interfere with daily life and associated comorbidities at early school age in apparently healthy children who are born extremely preterm? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e318">Findings</h5> <p id="d806118e320">This national cohort study found that more than one-third of children who were born extremely preterm in the modern neonatal era had developmental coordination disorder at 6.5 years of uncorrected age, which was associated with considerable adaptive behavioral and perceptual problems and worse cognition. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e323">Meaning</h5> <p id="d806118e325">Motor impairments are common at early school age in children who are born extremely preterm and are associated with several comorbidities, which is important for clinicians planning and implementing follow-up programs. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e329">Importance</h5> <p id="d806118e331">There are concerns that apparently healthy extremely preterm children face a risk of developing motor impairments, such as developmental coordination disorder. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e334">Objective</h5> <p id="d806118e336">To evaluate the prevalence of developmental coordination disorder and associated comorbidities in a national cohort of apparently healthy children born at 22 to 26 gestational weeks, compared alongside term-born peers. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e339">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d806118e341">This prospective, population-based cohort study included all children who were consecutively born at 22 to 26 gestational weeks in Sweden from April 1, 2004, through March 31, 2007. At 6.5 years, 441 preterm children were evaluated alongside 371 controls. A total of 275 preterm children (62.4%) and 359 term-born children (96.8%) did not have neurodevelopmental disabilities. Motor assessments were completed for 229 of 275 preterm children (83.3%) and 344 of 359 (95.8%) term-born children, who composed the final study sample. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e344">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d806118e346">Developmental coordination disorder was defined as a score of the fifth percentile or lower on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition scale, using control group scores. Assessment tools included the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition, the Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales, the Five to Fifteen questionnaire, and the Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e349">Results</h5> <p id="d806118e351">Of the 229 extremely preterm children and 344 term-born controls who underwent motor assessments, 115 (50.2%) and 194 (56.4%) were boys, respectively. Developmental coordination disorder was present in 85 of 229 (37.1%) preterm children and in 19 of 344 controls (5.5%) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.92; 99% CI, 3.69-17.20). When preterm children with developmental coordination disorder were compared with term-born peers, the risk was increased for total behavioral problems, internalizing, externalizing, attentional problems, hyperactivity, perceptual problems, executive dysfunction, and poor social skills, with adjusted ORs varying from 2.66 (99% CI, 1.09-6.48) for time concepts to 9.06 (99% CI, 3.60-22.8) for attentional problems (all <i>P</i> &lt; .01). When preterm children with and without developmental coordination disorder were compared, preterm children with developmental coordination disorder had more behavioral problems; the adjusted OR for total behavioral problems was 2.71 (99% CI, 1.15-6.37); for externalizing problems, 2.80 (99% CI, 1.10-7.12); for inattention, 3.38 (99% CI, 1.39-8.18); and for combined attention/hyperactivity problems, 3.68 (99% CI, 1.47-9.16) (all <i>P</i> &lt; .01). Parents underestimated the children’s motor problems and only a few of the children had received psychological care or physiotherapy. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-poi180032-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d806118e360">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d806118e362">Children who were born extremely preterm faced a high risk for developmental coordination disorder with associated comorbidities. Our findings support the importance of a structured follow-up of motor function, behavior, and cognition. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d806118e365">This cohort study assesses the prevalence of developmental coordination disorder and its association with developmental comorbidities at 6.5 years in children without major disabilities who were born extremely preterm in the 2000s and were part of the EXPRESS study. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders.

          IQ scores are volatile indices of global functional outcome, the final common path of an individual's genes, biology, cognition, education, and experiences. In studying neurocognitive outcomes in children with neurodevelopmental disorders, it is commonly assumed that IQ can and should be partialed out of statistical relations or used as a covariate for specific measures of cognitive outcome. We propose that it is misguided and generally unjustified to attempt to control for IQ differences by matching procedures or, more commonly, by using IQ scores as covariates. We offer logical, statistical, and methodological arguments, with examples from three neurodevelopmental disorders (spina bifida meningomyelocele, learning disabilities, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) that: (1) a historical reification of general intelligence, g, as a causal construct that measures aptitude and potential rather than achievement and performance has fostered the idea that IQ has special status and that in studying neurocognitive function in neurodevelopmental disorders; (2) IQ does not meet the requirements for a covariate; and (3) using IQ as a matching variable or covariate has produced overcorrected, anomalous, and counterintuitive findings about neurocognitive function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Motor development in very preterm and very low-birth-weight children from birth to adolescence: a meta-analysis.

            Infants who are very preterm (born < or = 32 weeks of gestation) and very low birth weight (VLBW) (weighing < or = 1500 g) are at risk for poor developmental outcomes. There is increasing evidence that very preterm birth and VLBW have a considerable effect on motor development, although findings are inconsistent. To investigate the relationship between very preterm birth and VLBW and motor development. The computerized databases EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge were used to search for English-language peer-reviewed articles published between January 1992 and August 2009. Studies were included if they reported motor scores of very preterm and VLBW children without congenital anomalies using 1 of 3 established and widely used motor tests: the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II), the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC), and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP). Forty-one articles were identified, encompassing 9653 children. In comparison with term-born peers, very preterm and VLBW children obtained significantly lower scores on all 3 motor tests: BSID-II: d = -0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.96 to -0.80; P < .001), MABC: d = -0.65 (95% CI, -0.70 to -0.60; P < .001), and BOTMP: d = -0.57 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.46; P < .001). Whereas motor outcomes on the BSID-II show a catch-up effect in the first years of development (r = 0.50, P = .01), the results on the MABC demonstrate a nonsignificantly greater deficit with increasing age during elementary school and early adolescence (r = -0.59, P = .07). Being born preterm or VLBW is associated with significant motor impairment persisting throughout childhood.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the "Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire".

              A new English instrument for screening mental health in children and adolescents, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), was translated into Swedish and used for parental ratings of 900 children aged 6-10 years from the general population. The SDQ which comprises 25 items, divided into 5 subscales (prosocial, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, and peer problems) was developed from the Rutter scales. An earlier English validation study has shown the two instruments to have equal ability to identify child psychiatric cases, but the SDQ also provides screening on empathy and prosocial behaviour which are aspects of child development emphasized in current child psychiatry. The design of the SDQ with both strengths' and difficulties' items supposedly increases acceptability of the instrument on behalf of informants and makes the questionnaire especially suitable for studies of general population where the majority of children are healthy. Our results, which are novel findings on the instrument, confirmed the postulated factor structure and showed significant gender-differences in results on the total scale, prosocial and hyperactivity subscales and on some of the single items. Moreover, our investigation showed that a Swedish translation of the parental version of the SDQ worked well.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Pediatrics
                JAMA Pediatr
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6203
                August 01 2018
                August 01 2018
                : 172
                : 8
                : 765
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Sachs’ Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]Unit of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
                [5 ]Department of Paediatrics, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
                [6 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children’s and Women’s Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway
                [7 ]Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
                [8 ]Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
                Article
                10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1394
                6142915
                29868837
                f3b58250-f123-4d2a-81b2-0b93ce103b18
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article