10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Observational Pilot Study Evaluating the Utility of Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling to Determine the Cause of Stillbirths in South African Women

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite approximately 2.6 million stillbirths occurring annually, there is a paucity of systematic biological investigation and consequently knowledge on the causes of these deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We investigated the utility of minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), placental examination, and clinical history, in attributing the causes of stillbirth in a South African LMIC setting.

          Methods

          This prospective, observational pilot study undertook sampling of brain, lung, and liver tissue using core biopsy needles, blood and cerebrospinal fluid collection, and placental examination. Testing included microbial culture and/or molecular testing and tissue histological examination. The cause of death was determined for each case by an international panel of medical specialists and categorized using the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision application to perinatal deaths.

          Results

          A cause of stillbirth was identifiable for 117 of 129 (90.7%) stillbirths, including an underlying maternal cause in 63.4% (n = 83) and an immediate fetal cause in 79.1% (n = 102) of cases. The leading underlying causes of stillbirth were maternal hypertensive disorders (16.3%), placental separation and hemorrhage (14.0%), and chorioamnionitis (10.9%). The leading immediate causes of fetal death were antepartum hypoxia (35.7%) and fetal infection (37.2%), including due to Escherichia coli (16.3%), Enterococcus species (3.9%), and group B Streptococcus (3.1%).

          Conclusions

          In this pilot, proof-of-concept study, focused investigation of stillbirth provided granular detail on the causes thereof in an LMIC setting, including provisionally highlighting the largely underrecognized role of fetal sepsis as a dominant cause.

          Abstract

          Minimally invasive tissue sampling, placental examination, and clinical history were utilized to attribute cause of death in South African stillbirths. The leading underlying maternal causes included hypertensive disorders, hemorrhage, and chorioamnionitis, and immediate fetal causes were antepartum hypoxia and infection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          INTERGROWTH-21st very preterm size at birth reference charts.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Willingness to Know the Cause of Death and Hypothetical Acceptability of the Minimally Invasive Autopsy in Six Diverse African and Asian Settings: A Mixed Methods Socio-Behavioural Study

            Background The minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is being investigated as an alternative to complete diagnostic autopsies for cause of death (CoD) investigation. Before potential implementation of the MIA in settings where post-mortem procedures are unusual, a thorough assessment of its feasibility and acceptability is essential. Methods and Findings We conducted a socio-behavioural study at the community level to understand local attitudes and perceptions related to death and the hypothetical feasibility and acceptability of conducting MIAs in six distinct settings in Gabon, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, and Pakistan. A total of 504 interviews (135 key informants, 175 health providers [including formal health professionals and traditional or informal health providers], and 194 relatives of deceased people) were conducted. The constructs “willingness to know the CoD” and “hypothetical acceptability of MIAs” were quantified and analysed using the framework analysis approach to compare the occurrence of themes related to acceptability across participants. Overall, 75% (379/504) of the participants would be willing to know the CoD of a relative. The overall hypothetical acceptability of MIA on a relative was 73% (366/504). The idea of the MIA was acceptable because of its perceived simplicity and rapidity and particularly for not “mutilating” the body. Further, MIAs were believed to help prevent infectious diseases, address hereditary diseases, clarify the CoD, and avoid witchcraft accusations and conflicts within families. The main concerns regarding the procedure included the potential breach of confidentiality on the CoD, the misperception of organ removal, and the incompatibility with some religious beliefs. Formal health professionals were concerned about possible contradictions between the MIA findings and the clinical pre-mortem diagnoses. Acceptability of the MIA was equally high among Christian and Islamic communities. However, in the two predominantly Muslim countries, MIA acceptability was higher in Mali than in Pakistan. While the results of the study are encouraging for the potential use of the MIA for CoD investigation in low-income settings, they remain hypothetical, with a need for confirmation with real-life MIA implementation and in populations beyond Health and Demographic Surveillance System areas. Conclusions This study showed a high level of interest in knowing the CoD of a relative and a high hypothetical acceptability of MIAs as a tool for CoD investigation across six distinct settings. These findings anticipate potential barriers and facilitators, both at the health facility and community level, essential for local tailoring of recommendations for future MIA implementation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Infection and stillbirth.

              Infection may cause stillbirth by several mechanisms, including direct infection, placental damage, and severe maternal illness. Various organisms have been associated with stillbirth, including many bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. In developed countries, between 10% and 25% of stillbirths may be caused by an infection, whereas in developing countries, which have much higher stillbirth rates, the contribution of infection is much greater. In developed countries, ascending bacterial infection, both before and after membrane rupture, with organisms such as Escherichia coli, group B streptococci, and Ureaplasma urealyticum is usually the most common infectious cause of stillbirth. However, in areas where syphilis is prevalent, up to half of all stillbirths may be caused by this infection alone. Malaria may be an important cause of stillbirth in women infected for the first time in pregnancy. The two most important viral causes of stillbirth are parvovirus and Coxsackie virus, although a number of other viral infections appear to be causal. Toxoplasma gondii, Listeria monocytogenes, and the organisms that cause leptospirosis, Q fever, and Lyme disease have all been implicated as etiologic for stillbirth. In certain developing countries, the stillbirth rate is high and the infection-related component so great that achieving a substantial reduction in stillbirth should be possible by reducing maternal infections. However, because infection-related stillbirth is uncommon in developed countries, and because those that do occur are caused by a wide variety of organisms, reducing this etiologic component of stillbirth much further will be difficult.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Infect Dis
                Clin. Infect. Dis
                cid
                Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1058-4838
                1537-6591
                15 October 2019
                09 October 2019
                09 October 2019
                : 69
                : Suppl 4 , The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network: Foundational Methods
                : S342-S350
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science , Johannesburg, South Africa
                [2 ] Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences , Johannesburg, South Africa
                [3 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg, South Africa
                [4 ] ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ] Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM) , Maputo, Mozambique
                [6 ] Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA) , Barcelona, Spain
                [7 ] Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics Department, Hospital de Sant Joan de Deu, University of Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [8 ] Consorcio de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Epidemiologia y Salud , Madrid, Spain
                [9 ] Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [10 ] Emory Global Health Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [11 ] National Health Laboratory Service, Department of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences , Johannesburg, South Africa
                [12 ] Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [13 ] National Health Laboratory Service, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg, South Africa
                Author notes
                Correspondence: S. A. Madhi, Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Central-West Wing, 11th Floor, Chris Hani Road, Soweto 2013, South Africa ( madhis@ 123456rmpru.co.za ).
                Article
                ciz573
                10.1093/cid/ciz573
                6785671
                31598656
                f295e92b-3ac7-48e5-a4ed-9fc15133c2a8
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 10.13039/100000865
                Award ID: OPP1101764
                Categories
                Supplement Articles

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                mits,stillbirth and fetal death,maternal hypertension,fetal hypoxia,fetal infection

                Comments

                Comment on this article