For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
28
views
17
references
 Top references
cited by
60
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      108
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Evidence and Gap Maps (EGMs) are a systematic evidence synthesis product which display the available evidence relevant to a specific research question. EGMs are produced following the same principles as a systematic reviews, that is: specify a PICOS, a comprehensive search, screening against explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, and systematic coding, analysis and reporting. This paper provides guidance on producing EGMs for publication in Campbell Systematic Reviews.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

          Beverley Shea, Barnaby Reeves, George Wells … (2017)
          The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions. It is important that users can distinguish high quality reviews. Many instruments have been designed to evaluate different aspects of reviews, but there are few comprehensive critical appraisal instruments. AMSTAR was developed to evaluate systematic reviews of randomised trials. In this paper, we report on the updating of AMSTAR and its adaptation to enable more detailed assessment of systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. With moves to base more decisions on real world observational evidence we believe that AMSTAR 2 will assist decision makers in the identification of high quality systematic reviews, including those based on non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions.
          Article 0 comments Cited 2491 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)

            Simon Lewin, Claire Glenton, Heather M Munthe-Kaas … (2016)
            Simon Lewin and colleagues present a methodology for increasing transparency and confidence in qualitative research synthesis.
            Article 0 comments Cited 166 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews

              Shannon Kugley, Anne Wade, James Thomas … (2017)
              Article 0 comments Cited 80 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Howard White: hwhite@campbellcollaboration.org
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Campbell Syst Rev
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Campbell Syst Rev
                Journal ID (doi): 10.1002/(ISSN)1891-1803
                Journal ID (publisher-id): CL2
                Title: Campbell Systematic Reviews
                Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                ISSN (Electronic): 1891-1803
                Publication date (Electronic): 19 November 2020
                Publication date Collection: December 2020
                Volume: 16
                Issue: 4 ( doiID: 10.1002/cl2.v16.4 )
                Electronic Location Identifier: e1125
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Campbell Collaboration New Delhi India
                [ 2 ] Centre for Evidence and Implementation London U.K
                [ 3 ] International Initiative for Impact Evaluation New Delhi India
                [ 4 ] Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway
                [ 5 ] Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr PA USA
                [ 6 ] McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
                [ 7 ] Bruyère Research Institute Ottawa Canada
                [ 8 ] Georgia State University Atlanta GA USA
                [ 9 ] International Initiative for Impact Evaluation London United Kingdom
                [ 10 ] London International Development Centre London United Kingdom
                [ 11 ] Campbell Collaboration Ottawa Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Howard White, Campbell Collaboration c/o GDB, ISID Complex, Vasant Kunj Institutional Area, New Delhi ‐ 110070, India.

                Email: hwhite@ 123456campbellcollaboration.org

                Article
                Publisher ID: CL21125
                DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1125
                PMC ID: 8356343
                PubMed ID: 37016607
                SO-VID: f2386ad7-d21d-45cc-8a28-2a12fe0ac827
                Copyright © © 2020 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration
                License:

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 0, Words: 0
                Categories
                Subject: Methods Research Paper
                Subject: Methods Research Paper
                Subject: Methods
                Custom metadata
                source-schema-version-number 2.0
                cover-date December 2020
                details-of-publishers-convertor Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.3 mode:remove_FC converted:30.03.2022

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content108

                See all similar

                Cited by60

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors190

                See all reference authors