7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.

      American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, pathology, Colposcopy, standards, statistics & numerical data, Female, Humans, Observer Variation, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index (RCI) to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN 3 during the National Cancer Institute (NCI) ASCUS LSIL Triage Study (ALTS). Colposcopists from 4 ALTS clinical centers indicated an RCI score after colposcopically examining subjects. Colposcopy quality control reviewers also documented an RCI score for the same subjects after assessing their digitized cervical images. Associations of colposcopist and reviewer RCI scores with histologic results were evaluated. Agreement rates between colposcopists and reviewers were calculated for colposcopic impression. Overall RCI score agreement was poor (weighted Kappa = 0.17). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of a colposcopist's RCI score of >3/6 to detect CIN 3 or worse were 37.3% (95% CI 32.5%-42.3%), 89.7% (88.6%-90.8%), 30.8% (26.7%-35.2%), and 92.1% (91.1%-93.0%), respectively. The 3 colposcopic signs were not individually sensitive in detecting CIN 3. Colposcopists using the RCI in the ALTS trial failed to detect CIN 2/3 at the levels expected.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article