19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Governing for Future Generations: How Political Trust Shapes Attitudes Towards Climate and Debt Policies

      , , ,
      Frontiers in Political Science
      Frontiers Media SA

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Policy decisions, and public preferences about them, often entail judgements about costs people should be willing to pay for the benefit of future generations. Economic analyses discount policies’ future benefits based on expectations about increasing standards of living, while empirical studies in psychology have found future-oriented people are more motivated to protect the environment. In this article, using original surveys and survey experiments in four countries—Sweden, Spain, South Korea, and China—we show that support for future-oriented policies also strongly reflects people’s political trust. Focusing on policies for reducing either global warming or public debt, we find political trust operates on attitudes by shaping people’s (a) confidence in policies’ effectiveness and (b) willingness to sacrifice for others. The influence of political trust outweighs that of subjective concern, while discounting has so little impact that people who expect future generations to be richer are more, not less, willing to sacrifice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

          In this article, we attempt to distinguish between the properties of moderator and mediator variables at a number of levels. First, we seek to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating, both conceptually and strategically, the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ. We then go beyond this largely pedagogical function and delineate the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena, including control and stress, attitudes, and personality traits. We also provide a specific compendium of analytic procedures appropriate for making the most effective use of the moderator and mediator distinction, both separately and in terms of a broader causal system that includes both moderators and mediators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              What Are the Origins of Political Trust?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Frontiers in Political Science
                Front. Polit. Sci.
                Frontiers Media SA
                2673-3145
                May 11 2021
                May 11 2021
                : 3
                Article
                10.3389/fpos.2021.656053
                f1536e87-67f2-4ba0-bff0-15253250e4ef
                © 2021

                Free to read

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article