56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Household Secondary Attack Rates of SARS-CoV-2 by Variant and Vaccination Status : An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , , PhD 1 , , PhD 1 , , MD, DSc 2 , 3 , , PhD 4
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic reviewe and meta-analysis evaluates household secondary attack rates of SARS-CoV-2 by variant and vaccination status.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are viral variants of concern and increased vaccination associated with SARS-CoV-2 household transmission rates?

          Findings

          In this systemic review and meta-analysis of 135 studies with more than 1.3 million participants in 36 countries, household secondary attack rates increased over time and were higher for Omicron (42.7%), Alpha (36.4%), and Delta (29.7%) variants than previously reported estimates (18.9%). Full vaccination reduced susceptibility and infectiousness, but more so for Alpha than Delta and Omicron.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 transcends protection of the individual by conferring indirect protection to other household members, but the degree of protection is seemingly lower for emerging variants.

          Abstract

          Importance

          An overall household secondary attack rate (SAR) of 18.9% (95% CI, 16.2%-22.0%) through June 17, 2021 was previously reported for SARS-CoV-2. Emerging variants of concern and increased vaccination have affected transmission rates.

          Objective

          To evaluate how reported household SARs changed over time and whether SARs varied by viral variant and index case and contact vaccination status.

          Data Sources

          PubMed and medRxiv from June 18, 2021, through March 8, 2022, and reference lists of eligible articles. Preprints were included.

          Study Selection

          Articles with original data reporting the number of infected and total number of household contacts. Search terms included SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, variant, vaccination, secondary attack rate, secondary infection rate, household, index case, family contacts, close contacts, and family transmission.

          Data Extraction and Synthesis

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline was followed. Meta-analyses used generalized linear mixed models to obtain SAR estimates and 95% CIs.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          SAR stratified by covariates according to variant, index case and contact vaccination status, and index case identification period. SARs were used to estimate vaccine effectiveness on the basis of the transmission probability for susceptibility to infection ( VE S,p ), infectiousness given infection ( VE I,p ), and total vaccine effectiveness ( VE T,p ).

          Results

          Household SARs were higher for 33 studies with midpoints in 2021 to 2022 (37.3%; 95% CI, 32.7% to 42.1%) compared with 63 studies with midpoints through April 2020 (15.5%; 95% CI, 13.2% to 18.2%). Household SARs were 42.7% (95% CI, 35.4% to 50.4%) for Omicron (7 studies), 36.4% (95% CI, 33.4% to 39.5%) for Alpha (11 studies), 29.7% (95% CI, 23.0% to 37.3%) for Delta (16 studies), and 22.5% (95% CI, 18.6% to 26.8%) for Beta (3 studies). For full vaccination, VE S,p was 78.6% (95% CI, 76.0% to 80.9%) for Alpha, 56.4% (95% CI, 54.6% to 58.1%) for Delta, and 18.1% (95% CI, −18.3% to 43.3%) for Omicron; VE I,p was 75.3% (95% CI, 69.9% to 79.8%) for Alpha, 21.9% (95% CI, 11.0% to 31.5%) for Delta, and 18.2% (95% CI, 0.6% to 32.6%) for Omicron; and VE T,p was 94.7% (95% CI, 93.3% to 95.8%) for Alpha, 64.4% (95% CI, 58.0% to 69.8%) for Delta, and 35.8% (95% CI, 13.0% to 52.6%) for Omicron.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These results suggest that emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern have increased transmissibility. Full vaccination was associated with reductions in susceptibility and infectiousness, but more so for Alpha than Delta and Omicron. The changes in estimated vaccine effectiveness underscore the challenges of developing effective vaccines concomitant with viral evolution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

              We study recently developed nonparametric methods for estimating the number of missing studies that might exist in a meta-analysis and the effect that these studies might have had on its outcome. These are simple rank-based data augmentation techniques, which formalize the use of funnel plots. We show that they provide effective and relatively powerful tests for evaluating the existence of such publication bias. After adjusting for missing studies, we find that the point estimate of the overall effect size is approximately correct and coverage of the effect size confidence intervals is substantially improved, in many cases recovering the nominal confidence levels entirely. We illustrate the trim and fill method on existing meta-analyses of studies in clinical trials and psychometrics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                28 April 2022
                April 2022
                28 April 2022
                : 5
                : 4
                : e229317
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville
                [2 ]Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
                [3 ]Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle
                [4 ]Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: March 10, 2022.
                Published: April 28, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9317
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Madewell ZJ et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Zachary J. Madewell, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, PO Box 117450, Gainesville, FL 32611 ( zmadewe@ 123456emory.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Madewell had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Madewell, Longini, Dean.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Madewell.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Madewell, Yang, Longini, Halloran.
                Obtained funding: Longini, Dean.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Longini.
                Supervision: Dean.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Yang reported receiving grants from National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01-AI139761 to Dr Dean).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi220282
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9317
                9051991
                35482308
                f1454f5b-6f87-4562-8683-0435a473b4a3
                Copyright 2022 Madewell ZJ et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 17 December 2021
                : 10 March 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Global Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article