3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      COVID‐19 susceptibility and clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The susceptibility, risk factors, and prognosis of COVID‐19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain unknown. Thus, our study aims to assess the prevalence and clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 in IBD. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and medRxiv from 2019 to 1 June 2022 for cohort and case‐control studies comparing the prevalence and clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 in patients with IBD and in the general population. We also compared the outcomes of patients receiving and not receiving 5‐aminosalicylates (ASA), tumour necrosis factor antagonists, biologics, systemic corticosteroids, or immunomodulators for IBD. Thirty five studies were eligible for our analysis. Pooled odds ratio of COVID‐19‐related hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or death in IBD compared to in non‐IBD were 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28–1.18), 1.09 (95% CI = 0.27–4.47), and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.32–1.42), respectively. Inflammatory bowel disease was not associated with increased hospitalisation, ICU admission, or death. Susceptibility to COVID‐19 did not increase with any drugs for IBD. Hospitalisation, ICU admission, and death were more likely with 5‐ASA and corticosteroid use. COVID‐19‐related hospitalisation (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38–0.74) and death (OR: 0.13; 95% CI = 0.13–0.70) were less likely with Crohn's disease than ulcerative colitis (UC). In conclusion, IBD does not increase the mortality and morbidity of COVID‐19. However, physicians should be aware that additional monitoring is needed in UC patients or in patients taking 5‐ASA or systemic corticosteroids.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

          Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                shinji@yuhs.ac
                Journal
                Rev Med Virol
                Rev Med Virol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1654
                RMV
                Reviews in Medical Virology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1052-9276
                1099-1654
                11 December 2022
                11 December 2022
                : e2414
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
                [ 2 ] University of Florida College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
                [ 3 ] Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Jinju Republic of Korea
                [ 4 ] Department of Nephrology Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine Wonju Republic of Korea
                [ 5 ] Department of Digital Health Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST) Sungkyunkwan University Seoul Republic of Korea
                [ 6 ] Department of Pediatrics Kyung Hee University College of Medicine Seoul Korea
                [ 7 ] Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute Kyung Hee University Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
                [ 8 ] Department of Precision Medicine Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Suwon Republic of Korea
                [ 9 ] Research and Development Unit Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, ISCIII Barcelona Spain
                [ 10 ] ICREA Barcelona Spain
                [ 11 ] Faculty of Medicine University of Versailles Saint‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines Montigny‐le‐Bretonneux France
                [ 12 ] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) Madrid Spain
                [ 13 ] Department of Health, Social and Clinical Pharmacy Evidence‐Based and Clinical Research Laboratory College of Pharmacy Chung‐Ang University Seoul Korea
                [ 14 ] Department of Internal Medicine Severance Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Korea
                [ 15 ] Department of Pediatrics Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
                [ 16 ] The Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jae Il Shin, Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei‐ro 50, Seodaemun‐gu, C.P.O. Box 8044, Seoul 03722, Korea.

                Email: shinji@ 123456yuhs.ac

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-9948
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3525-8805
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2326-1820
                Article
                RMV2414
                10.1002/rmv.2414
                9877653
                36504172
                ef13df0a-9668-4615-9d9f-d16e30b5ffe0
                © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 08 November 2022
                : 25 December 2021
                : 17 November 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 15, Words: 7718
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.4 mode:remove_FC converted:26.01.2023

                Microbiology & Virology
                covid‐19,crohn's disease,inflammatory bowel disease,meta‐analysis,ulcerative colitis

                Comments

                Comment on this article