7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Toward Modeling Continental‐Scale Inland Water Carbon Dioxide Emissions

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inland waters emit significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO 2) to the atmosphere; however, the global magnitude and source distribution of inland water CO 2 emissions remain uncertain. These fluxes have previously been “statistically upscaled” by independently estimating dissolved CO 2 concentrations and gas exchange velocities to calculate fluxes. This scaling, while robust and defensible, has known limitations in representing carbon source limitations and spatial variability. Here, we develop and calibrate a CO 2 transport model for the continental United States, simulating carbon transport and transformation in >22 million hydraulically connected rivers, lakes, and reservoirs. We estimate 25% lower CO 2 fluxes compared to upscaling estimates forced by the same observational calibration data. While precise CO 2 source distribution estimates are limited by the resolution of model parameterizations, our model suggests that stream corridor CO 2 production dominates over groundwater inputs at the continental scale. Our results further suggest that the lack of observational networks for groundwater CO 2 and scalable metabolic models of aquatic CO 2 production remain the most salient barriers to further coupling of our model with other Earth system components.

          Plain Language Summary

          Inland water CO 2 emissions are recognized as an important but highly uncertain component of the global carbon cycle. Estimates rely on methods that statistically upscale point observations that are unable to account for the distribution and limits of CO 2 sources. Here we present a first step toward distributed process‐based models that link CO 2 fluxes to water transport in connected rivers, lakes, and reservoirs at the continental scale. We show that using the same data constraints, incorporating water transport results in a 25% reduction relative to previous methods in estimated inland water CO 2 fluxes over the continental United States. We identify barriers to monitoring and prediction that will enable the incorporation of inland water carbon into earth system models and global budgets.

          Key Points

          • We develop and calibrate a river network carbon dioxide transport model for the continental United States to estimate emission fluxes

          • Compared to previous methods, this model simulates 25% lower carbon dioxide emissions using the same data constraints

          • Stream corridor respiration dominates over groundwater sources, but better source constraints are needed for accurate forward predictions

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach

          Lakes are key components of biogeochemical and ecological processes, thus knowledge about their distribution, volume and residence time is crucial in understanding their properties and interactions within the Earth system. However, global information is scarce and inconsistent across spatial scales and regions. Here we develop a geo-statistical model to estimate the volume of global lakes with a surface area of at least 10 ha based on the surrounding terrain information. Our spatially resolved database shows 1.42 million individual polygons of natural lakes with a total surface area of 2.67 × 106 km2 (1.8% of global land area), a total shoreline length of 7.2 × 106 km (about four times longer than the world's ocean coastline) and a total volume of 181.9 × 103 km3 (0.8% of total global non-frozen terrestrial water stocks). We also compute mean and median hydraulic residence times for all lakes to be 1,834 days and 456 days, respectively.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The solubilities of calcite, aragonite and vaterite in CO2-H2O solutions between 0 and 90°C, and an evaluation of the aqueous model for the system CaCO3-CO2-H2O

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Global Carbon Budget 2022

              Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the year 2021, EFOS increased by 5.1 % relative to 2020, with fossil emissions at 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and ELUC was 1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 (40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO2). Also, for 2021, GATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 (2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr−1), SOCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1, and SLAND was 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1, with a BIM of −0.6 GtC yr−1 (i.e. the total estimated sources were too low or sinks were too high). The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2021 reached 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2022 suggest an increase in EFOS relative to 2021 of +1.0 % (0.1 % to 1.9 %) globally and atmospheric CO2 concentration reaching 417.2 ppm, more than 50 % above pre-industrial levels (around 278 ppm). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2021, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extratropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022b).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                AGU Advances
                AGU Advances
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                2576-604X
                2576-604X
                December 2024
                November 04 2024
                December 2024
                : 5
                : 6
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Earth, Geographic, and Climate Sciences University of Massachusetts Amherst MA USA
                [2 ] Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Massachusetts Amherst MA USA
                Article
                10.1029/2024AV001294
                ee7f3719-ff7e-46f7-b94e-62a0f60a5478
                © 2024

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article