10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      COVID-19 crisis management of German ICU clinicians in leadership – a metaphor analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with an already long-standing crisis in health systems around the world characterized by economic pressure and increasing staff shortage. “Crisis” became a global metaphor to convey collective experiences of the COVID-19 threat. Little is known on how crisis metaphors influence thought and speech on crisis management and the challenging staff situation of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians in leadership positions and how they act. Therefore, we were interested in (1) which metaphorical concepts ICU clinicians in leadership use to express experiences and strategies in dealing with coinciding crises, (2) how these change over time, and (3) how metaphors in speech reveal self-images of crisis management. We conducted a systematic metaphor analysis focusing on data from three participants of a qualitative interview study with twenty-four healthcare professionals in ICUs in Germany. The participants were interviewed at two time points between April 2020 and March 2021. We identified and reconstructed metaphorical concepts of three interviewees (ICU clinicians in leadership) with regard to the pandemic management, and developed a typology based on the dimensions of mood, modus operandi, location, and scope. The typology consists of eight self-images (protagonists) for the crisis management of ICU clinicians in leadership, such as the figure of the soldier (“to unite everyone behind this flag”), the distributor (“sometimes it is a crazy patchwork [ wahnsinniges Gestückel]”) or the critic (“we are the fool for everything”). They embody different qualities of a leader and refer to intra- and inter-role conflicts within multiple crisis conditions. Metaphor analysis reveals different self-images of ICU leadership clinicians in relation to crisis management. This illustrates that thinking and perceptions of crisis management may strongly differ between and within leaders and may change over the course of crises. Our findings highlight the need both to improve knowledge on challenges associated with leadership in crises and preparedness, and to support clinicians in their leadership by recognizing and addressing differences and changes in leaders’ self-image.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being

          Background Health and social care workers (HSCWs) have carried a heavy burden during the COVID-19 crisis and, in the challenge to control the virus, have directly faced its consequences. Supporting their psychological wellbeing continues, therefore, to be a priority. This rapid review was carried out to establish whether there are any identifiable risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes amongst HSCWs during the COVID-19 crisis. Methods We undertook a rapid review of the literature following guidelines by the WHO and the Cochrane Collaboration’s recommendations. We searched across 14 databases, executing the search at two different time points. We included published, observational and experimental studies that reported the psychological effects on HSCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results The 24 studies included in this review reported data predominantly from China (18 out of 24 included studies) and most sampled urban hospital staff. Our study indicates that COVID-19 has a considerable impact on the psychological wellbeing of front-line hospital staff. Results suggest that nurses may be at higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes during this pandemic, but no studies compare this group with the primary care workforce. Furthermore, no studies investigated the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social care staff. Other risk factors identified were underlying organic illness, gender (female), concern about family, fear of infection, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and close contact with COVID-19. Systemic support, adequate knowledge and resilience were identified as factors protecting against adverse mental health outcomes. Conclusions The evidence to date suggests that female nurses with close contact with COVID-19 patients may have the most to gain from efforts aimed at supporting psychological well-being. However, inconsistencies in findings and a lack of data collected outside of hospital settings, suggest that we should not exclude any groups when addressing psychological well-being in health and social care workers. Whilst psychological interventions aimed at enhancing resilience in the individual may be of benefit, it is evident that to build a resilient workforce, occupational and environmental factors must be addressed. Further research including social care workers and analysis of wider societal structural factors is recommended. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-10070-3.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Covid-19 — Implications for the Health Care System

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global nurse shortages—the facts, the impact and action for change

              Nurses comprise half the global health workforce. A nine million shortage estimated in 2014 is predicted to decrease by two million by 2030 but disproportionality effect regions such as Africa. This scoping review investigated: what is known about current nurse workforces and shortages and what can be done to forestall such shortages?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                08 August 2023
                2023
                08 August 2023
                : 11
                : 1160094
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg , Magdeburg, Germany
                [2] 2University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO) at the Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John, University of Regensburg , Regensburg, Germany
                [3] 3Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Zittau-Görlitz , Görlitz, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Luis Möckel, University of Applied Sciences, Germany

                Reviewed by: Pasquale Stefanizzi, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy; Jennifer Creese, University of Leicester, United Kingdom; Marko Ćurković, Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Croatia

                *Correspondence: Madlen Hörold, madlen.hoerold@ 123456med.ovgu.de

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160094
                10470881
                37663843
                ee711d99-fe0e-4647-be16-895326d224d7
                Copyright © 2023 Piel, Hörold, Brandstetter, Drewitz, Hrudey, Schmitt and Apfelbacher.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 February 2023
                : 19 June 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 64, Pages: 11, Words: 9827
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Disaster and Emergency Medicine

                healthcare professionals,covid-19 pandemic,preparedness,hospital,qualitative study,leadership,crises,staff shortage

                Comments

                Comment on this article