36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community engagement for COVID-19 prevention and control: a rapid evidence synthesis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Community engagement has been considered a fundamental component of past outbreaks, such as Ebola. However, there is concern over the lack of involvement of communities and ‘bottom-up’ approaches used within COVID-19 responses thus far. Identifying how community engagement approaches have been used in past epidemics may support more robust implementation within the COVID-19 response.

          Methodology

          A rapid evidence review was conducted to identify how community engagement is used for infectious disease prevention and control during epidemics. Three databases were searched in addition to extensive snowballing for grey literature. Previous epidemics were limited to Ebola, Zika, SARS, Middle East respiratory syndromeand H1N1 since 2000. No restrictions were applied to study design or language.

          Results

          From 1112 references identified, 32 articles met our inclusion criteria, which detail 37 initiatives. Six main community engagement actors were identified: local leaders, community and faith-based organisations, community groups, health facility committees, individuals and key stakeholders. These worked on different functions: designing and planning, community entry and trust building, social and behaviour change communication, risk communication, surveillance and tracing, and logistics and administration.

          Conclusion

          COVID-19’s global presence and social transmission pathways require social and community responses. This may be particularly important to reach marginalised populations and to support equity-informed responses. Aligning previous community engagement experience with current COVID-19 community-based strategy recommendations highlights how communities can play important and active roles in prevention and control. Countries worldwide are encouraged to assess existing community engagement structures and use community engagement approaches to support contextually specific, acceptable and appropriate COVID-19 prevention and control measures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)

          An unprecedented outbreak of pneumonia of unknown aetiology in Wuhan City, Hubei province in China emerged in December 2019. A novel coronavirus was identified as the causative agent and was subsequently termed COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Considered a relative of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), COVID-19 is caused by a betacoronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 that affects the lower respiratory tract and manifests as pneumonia in humans. Despite rigorous global containment and quarantine efforts, the incidence of COVID-19 continues to rise, with 90,870 laboratory-confirmed cases and over 3,000 deaths worldwide. In response to this global outbreak, we summarise the current state of knowledge surrounding COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

            The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behaviour change and places significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences can be used to help align human behaviour with the recommendations of epidemiologists and public health experts. Here we discuss evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping. In each section, we note the nature and quality of prior research, including uncertainty and unsettled issues. We identify several insights for effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight important gaps researchers should move quickly to fill in the coming weeks and months.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018–19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo: a population-based survey

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2020
                13 October 2020
                : 5
                : 10
                : e003188
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentUCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems , University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health , School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University , Kampala, Uganda
                [3 ]departmentExpanded Programme on Immunization , Ministry of Health , Yaoundé, Cameroon
                [4 ]RTI International , Pasig City, Philippines
                [5 ]departmentHeller School for Social Policy and Management , Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
                [6 ]République de Guinée Ministère de Santé , Conakry, Guinea
                [7 ]United Nations University International Institute for Global Health , Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [8 ]Public Health Foundation of India , Haryana, India
                [9 ]Community Health–Community of Practice Collectivity, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Headquarters , New York City, New York, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Brynne Gilmore; brynne.gilmore@ 123456ucd.ie
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-9254
                Article
                bmjgh-2020-003188
                10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003188
                7554411
                33051285
                ecbb19b1-50b7-48fe-8088-966355bd804b
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 June 2020
                : 24 August 2020
                : 25 August 2020
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                2474
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                review,infections,diseases,disorders,injuries,public health,prevention strategies

                Comments

                Comment on this article