18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurosurgery Services in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience from a Developing Country”

      discussion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Letter: We read with great interest the article by Manusubroto et al, 1 “Neurosurgery services in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from a developing country.” The first patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from Indonesia was reported on March 2, 2020. As a response to the pandemic, the Indonesian Ministry of Health selected several hospitals as the referral hospitals to handle COVID-19 cases. The authors' institution, Dr. Sardijito General Hospital, was one of these referral hospitals due to the availability of full-range intensive care unit (ICU) and isolation wards. In this article, the authors share their experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in the special region of Yogyakarta in Indonesia and discuss their institute protocol for preoperative preparation and the impact of the pandemic on the neurosurgical workload in their hospital. 1 In the pre−COVID-19 era, the Dr. Sardijito General Hospital had a long list of patients waiting to undergo surgery and even tumor patients had to wait for up to 6 months for operations. Cancellation or further postponement of these surgeries, as per recommendations by various bodies including Indonesian Society of Neurological Surgeons, would have resulted in further lengthening of waiting periods and would have led to worsening of patients' conditions. Therefore they decided against further postponement of surgeries during the pandemic. Despite this, the number of emergency operations per week decreased from 4 to 2.4 and the number of elective surgeries per week decreased from 16 to roughly 9, during phase 2 of the pandemic. According to Manusubroto et al, 1 the decrease in elective procedures could be because of reduced spots in the ICU for neurosurgery patients as most beds were reserved for COVID-19 patients and poor availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) in the early phase of breakdown. The improved PPE availability increased the safety of the procedure, which explains the increased number of elective surgical procedures after the second week of April 2020. India is a lower middle-income country as per the World Bank categorization. 2 During the lockdown, hospitals were prepared for the incoming tsunami of patients. Our hospital is the largest referral tertiary care hospital in the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, catering to a population of over 11 million. Our response to the pandemic was different from that of Manusubroto's institute in many aspects. In our hospital, dedicated areas were defined in our hospital as COVID-19 areas for COVID-19 confirmed and COVID-19 suspect patients. These had dedicated staff, posted there on a rotation basis from various departments. 3 There was no rule for hospital zoning in Manusubroto's institution. 1 Initially, we adopted the policy of postponement of elective cases. Once the hospital had adequate testing facilities, PPE, and ICU equipment, the intake of elective surgical patients was increased gradually. In our opinion, it is our duty to keep the elective neurosurgical work going as well as to protect our health care workers against contracting COVID-19 infection.4, 5, 6, 7 During the period of lockdown in India (March 25 to May 31, 2020), our surgical volume decreased from 111 to 53, a decline of 52.3% while the number of emergent surgeries remained the same (47 cases), when compared with the same duration in 2019.8, 9, 10 Thus we were able to continue providing emergency services even during the lockdown, while most of the “nonemergent” cases had been postponed/cancelled. Similarly, a large number of elective surgeries have been cancelled/postponed in hospitals across the world as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 We have strictly regulated our outpatient department (OPD), resulting in substantial decline in the outpatient volumes. 29 Our policy has been to continue the emergent operations even during the peak of the lockdown in the country as shown earlier. Still, there has been a decrease in the number of road traffic accident cases 8 similar to the observations of Manusubroto et al. 1 This may be attributed to decreased traffic on roads during the lockdown period. At our institute, we test all patients being admitted to the ward and test them again before surgery. 3 , 8 Thus we consider every patient as a “suspected” COVID-19 patient. The highly infective nature of the virus and high rate of asymptomatic/presymptomatic carriers justifies this policy. Doing 2 tests before surgery further reduces the false-negative result from 29% to 8.4% as the sensitivity of the tests available is only 71%. 30 If an emergent surgery does not allow preoperative COVID-19 testing, the patient is operated in dedicated COVID-19 operation room with necessary COVID-19 precautions. Such a patient undergoes COVID-19 testing postoperatively and is shifted to a non−COVID-19 area if he or she tests negative. Between April and August 2020, we had detected 6 patients with positive a COVID-19 result among 284 patients admitted under neurosurgery. 9 In our opinion, this COVID-19 testing policy along with strict quarantine/isolation rules have allowed us to restrict the infection rate in our health care workers to an acceptable level, thus allowing continued functioning in the hospital. 3 , 9 , 31, 32 To date, we have had only 1 attending neurosurgeon out of 8 testing positive for COVID-19 and none of the 10 residents have contracted COVID-19 infection. 3 By mid-April 2020, the testing rate in Indonesia was 130 tests per million population, one of the lowest in the world. The shortage in the testing facilities might be the reason for the institute COVID-19 testing protocol, described by Manusubroto et al. 1 They seemed to rely heavily on COVID-19−related history; laboratory tests (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein); and chest radiography. Few patients underwent chest computed tomography (CT) and rapid test, measuring IgG and IgM antibodies against COVID-19. In case of a positive rapid test, they did a real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. With this protocol of COVID-19 screening, there is a high chance of missing asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 infection. It would be interesting to know if they are still following the same protocol at Dr. Sardijito General Hospital and how many COVID-19 infections have been detected by them in patients and among their health care workers. In addition, we would be interested to know if they have noticed any increased mortality in their patients, as patients with perioperative COVID-19 infections have an increased rate of mortality (23.6%) and pulmonary infections (51.2%). 9 , 30 An increase in mortality compared with the pre−COVID-19 era could indicate undetected asymptomatic COVID-19 infections in their patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impact of COVID-19 on an Academic Neurosurgery Department: The Johns Hopkins Experience

          Since the initial characterization of a novel coronavirus in December 2019 (COVID-19), the globe has been gripped by a disruptive and dangerous pandemic that continues to upheave economies and test the limits of health care system capacities. The pandemic’s effect on neurosurgical practice has been detailed in timely editorials highlighting various challenges facing neurosurgeons who continue to strive to provide the best possible care to their patients, despite incredibly difficult circumstances. In this brief report, we seek to contribute to the ongoing efforts to accurately detail the impact of COVID-19 on neurosurgical practice in the United States by presenting our health care system’s unique experience.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Collateral damage caused by COVID-19: Change in volume and spectrum of neurosurgery patients

            Highlights • The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in cancellation/postponement of elective surgeries worldwide. • This has resulted in a major change in the volume and spectrum of neurosurgical cases. • The number of surgeries performed are decreasing as the number of COVID-19 cases increase. • Aerosol generating procedures put the neurosurgeons at a high risk of contracting COVID-19 infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neurosurgical Procedures and Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case-Control Multi-Center Study

              Abstract: Objective Quantitative documentation of the effects of outbreaks, including the COVID-19 pandemic, is limited in the field of neurosurgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurosurgical practice and to determine whether surgical procedures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Methods A multicenter case-control study was conducted, involving patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during two periods: pre-COVID-19, and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The surgical intervention data evaluated included diagnostic category, case priority, complications, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. Results A total of 850 procedures were included, 36% during COVID-19. The median number of procedures per day was significantly lower during the COVID-19 period (5.5 cases) than the pre-COVID-19 period (12 cases, P-value<0.0001). Complications, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality rates did not differ during the pandemic. In a multivariate analysis comparing both periods, case priority levels 1 (immediate) (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.24–2.67), 1 (1–24 h) (OR 1.63, 95%CI 1.10–2.41), and 4 (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.19–0.42) showed significant differences. Conclusions During the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the overall number of neurosurgical procedures declined, but the load of emergency procedures remained the same, thus highlighting the need to allocate sufficient resources for emergencies. More importantly, performing neurosurgical procedures during the pandemic in regions with limited effects of the outbreak on the health care system was safe. Our findings may aid in developing guidelines for acute and long-term care during pandemics in surgical sub-specialties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                World Neurosurg
                World Neurosurg
                World Neurosurgery
                Elsevier Inc.
                1878-8750
                1878-8769
                16 February 2021
                February 2021
                16 February 2021
                : 146
                : 415-416
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
                [2 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, New Delhi, India
                [3 ]Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                Author notes
                []To whom correspondence should be addressed: Nishant Goyal, M.Ch.
                Article
                S1878-8750(20)32319-6
                10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.117
                7884255
                ec547c5a-c768-49f2-b166-147a803a03d1
                © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article