61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Empowering Women and Improving Female Reproductive Health through Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases

      editorial
      1 , 2 , *
      PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Secretary Hillary Clinton has made the rights of women, especially those living in low-income countries, a central theme of her tenure at the United States Department of State. During her recent 11-day trip to sub-Saharan Africa, issues of gender equality and empowering women arguably had their highest profile ever [1], and there is a clear commitment by both the Secretary and the Obama administration to work aggressively toward achieving the two major Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that specifically advocate for women, namely MDG 3 “Promote gender equality and empower women” and MDG 5 “Improve maternal health” (see http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals). Because the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are the most common infections among the world's poorest people [2], including girls and women, there is now a strong case to be made for controlling the NTDs as a means of directly addressing MDG 3 and MDG 5. Studies conducted over the last two decades provide an evidence base that the NTDs are important factors that (i) impair reproductive health in developing countries; (ii) increase the transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs); and (iii) promote stigma and gender inequality (Table 1). For these reasons, interventions focused on NTD control and elimination could offer an opportunity for improving the health and rights of girls and women in the poorest countries of Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000559.t001 Table 1 Health Threats to Women Resulting from Neglected Tropical Diseases. Health Condition Neglected Tropical Disease References Reproductive Health Infertility Urogenital schistosomiasis, hookworm [3], [16]–[18] Severe anemia of pregnancy/lactation and high maternal morbidity and mortality Hookworm (major), schistosomiasis (minor) [3]–[13] Anemia associated with menstruation and amenorrhea Hookworm [3],[6] Congenital infection; lactogenic infection Chagas disease, leishmaniasis, strongyloidiasis, hookworm [6], [22]–[28] Low birthweight and/or premature birth from placental inflammation and maternal anemia Hookworm and other soil-transmitted helminth infections, schistosomiasis [10]–[13] Exacerbation of disease during pregnancy Leprosy, schistosomiasis [29],[30] Sexually Transmitted Infections HIV/AIDS Urogenital schistosomiasis [33]–[35] Trichomoniasis Trichomoniasis [31],[32] Social Exclusion and Stigma Limb, breast, skin, and genital deformities Lymphatic filariasis, Buruli ulcer, Onchocerca skin disease, leprosy, leishmaniasis [36]–[45] Facial disfigurement Leishmaniasis, leprosy [36], [46]–[48] The Impact of NTDs on Female Reproductive Health Pregnancy and lactation place huge iron demands on the mother and her child. A 1994 report from the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that a woman living in a developing country is practically always on the verge of iron deficiency anemia either because of pregnancy, which requires the transfer of 300 mg of iron to the fetus during the third trimester and an additional 500 mg of iron to accommodate an increase in red blood cell mass, or lactation, in which each episode transfers 0.75 mg of iron from mother to child [3]. Moreover, even before she becomes pregnant, a woman of childbearing age suffers substantial iron losses from menstruation [3]. Anemia, defined as a reduction in hemoglobin to <11 g/dl in the first and third trimester and <10.5 g/dl in the second trimester, creates a dangerous state of health for both mother and child [4]. It is estimated that 20% of maternal deaths in Africa are attributed to anemia, while simultaneously anemia represents a key risk factor for poor pregnancy outcome and low birth weight [4],[5]. It now appears that human hookworm infection, one of the most common NTDs affecting 576–740 million people in developing countries, considerably adds to the iron loss and anemia that occurs during pregnancy [6]. An estimated 44 million pregnant women are infected with hookworm at any one time [3], including up to one-third of all pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa [7]. In Africa and Latin America, hookworm is a major contributor to anemia in pregnancy [7],[8], while in Nepal and presumably elsewhere in Asia hookworm is responsible for 54% of cases of moderate to severe anemia during pregnancy [9]. Not surprisingly, deworming during pregnancy has major beneficial effects in terms of reduced maternal morbidity and mortality, as well as improved perinatal outcome [10],[11], and most likely leads to a reduction in maternal anemia. Such studies have led to calls for including deworming in antenatal packages in hookworm-endemic areas in developing countries [5],[6],[12]. There is also some evidence that schistosomiasis in pregnancy contributes to increased maternal morbidity and low birth weight [13]. Like hookworm infection, schistosomiasis is an important cause of anemia in Africa [5],[14], but in addition, schistosome eggs can be deposited in the placenta where they cause inflammation, and this feature may also contribute to adverse maternal-fetal outcomes [13]. Therefore, there is a need for expanded studies of praziquantel administration during pregnancy to complement the studies purporting a beneficial effect of anthelmintic drugs for hookworm and other soil-transmitted helminth infections. In addition to adverse pregnancy outcomes, both hookworm infection and schistosomiasis contribute to infertility. Since the 1920s, it has been noted that chronic hookworm among women of reproductive age causes amenorrhea and sterility, and that both regular menses and fertility could often be restored through deworming [3]. In sub-Saharan Africa there are an estimated 112 million people infected with urinary tract schistosomiasis caused by Schistosoma haematobium [15]. Up to 75% of women with S. haematobium infection are also at risk for infertility because of genitourinary schistosomiasis caused by the deposition of schistosome eggs and the resulting granulomatous inflammation in the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries [16]–[18]. There is interest in potentially preventing the onset of these inflammatory processes through early intervention with praziquantel [19]–[21]. It has also been noted that congenital infections with some NTD pathogens can occur commonly. Congenital toxoplasmosis and malaria are the best-known examples [22],[23], but there is also now evidence that congenital Chagas disease occurs with high frequency among seropositive pregnant mothers, particularly those with parasitemia [24],[25]. Congenital leishmaniasis has also been described [26],[27], as has lactogenic infection of hookworm and strongyloidiasis [6],[28]. Finally, pregnancy can result in host immunomodulatory effects that could affect the severity of both schistosomiasis, leprosy, and presumably other NTDs [29],[30]. NTDs and STIs Several NTDs are also STIs or, in some cases, NTDs promote susceptibility to other STIs. For example, trichomoniasis is both an NTD and an STI with the parasitic protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis, which is now recognized as one of the most common STIs in Africa and elsewhere [31]. In the United States of America, trichomoniasis is also an important STI among poor and under-represented minority populations [32]. Female genital schistosomiasis (especially of the lower genital tract) has been identified as an important co-factor in HIV transmission in rural areas of Africa where S. haematobium and HIV/AIDS are co-endemic [16], [33]–[35]. It has been suggested that the schistosome egg granulomas function as erosive or ulcerative lesions in the cervix and vagina, possibly similar to those caused by other STIs such as herpes simplex virus-2 infection or syphilis. Such lesions presumably facilitate HIV viral entry, or possibly HIV entry, and replication is enhanced by the propensity of the schistosome egg granulomas to cause bleeding or serve as a repository of CD4+ cells [16]. In any case, female genital schistosomiasis has been shown in a rural area of northern Zimbabwe to be associated with a 3-fold risk of horizontal HIV/AIDS transmission [34], furthering the urgency to investigate praziquantel treatment of this condition as a part of a larger allied effort toward HIV/AIDS prevention. NTDs, Stigma, and Gender Inequality In her 2007 address to the WHO Global Partners Meeting on NTDs, Margaret Chan, the Director-General of WHO, stated that “stigma and social isolation, especially for women, compound the misery and further embed people in poverty” [36]. Previous articles in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases have explored the important social and economic consequences of stigma associated with the disfigurement of many NTDs, including lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis, leishmaniasis, and the mycobacterial infections (such as Buruli ulcer and leprosy [37],[38]), and indeed, emerging evidence (summarized in a 2005 report commissioned by WHO-Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases [TDR]) suggests that women are often particularly isolated and marginalized by stigma-associated NTDs [39]. In LF, lymphedema occurs more frequently in women than in men [39],[40], often with involvement of the breasts and vulva [39],[41], but these clinical features frequently go unnoticed because in some developing countries the examination of women is restricted to the arms and legs [39],[42]. A recent qualitative study of LF from Sri Lanka has articulated the breadth and depth of social stigma linked to LF among women and includes evidence for lost jobs and wages and abandonment by family [38]. Similarly, African women are disproportionately ostracized for Onchocerca skin disease [43]–[45], and in South Asia women are sometimes prevented from seeking medical attention for kala-azar (accounting for a higher disease burden from this condition among women) [46]. In Afghanistan, cutaneous leishmaniasis prevents mothers from holding their children, while in Colombia this disease is a contributing factor for spousal abandonment [46]. The social impact of leprosy is also greater among women [39],[47],[48], an observation that stimulated the WHO Director-General to remark in 2007, “imagine the impact when a young woman with leprosy is told she can be fully cured, can marry, have children, and will not infect others. Just imagine the impact” [36]. Future Directions Because of the dramatic impact of NTDs on the health of women, especially girls and women in their child-bearing years, it is critically important that these populations are included in current and proposed large-scale interventions for NTDs. Efforts to expand global deworming with benzimidazole anthelmintics against soil-transmitted helminth infections and praziquantel against schistosomiasis should include pregnant women as recommended in recently issued WHO guidelines for helminth control [49]. At the same time, there should be increased efforts to conduct safety testing of ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine in pregnancy or during lactation, such as the one study recently reported from Uganda [50], in order to ensure that all women in their reproductive years may one day become eligible for mass drug administration against onchocerciasis and LF, as well as for integrated control against all of the most common NTDs [2]. Similarly, there is a need for additional operational research on the beneficial effects of NTD control on pregnancy outcome, and studies to examine the impact of praziquantel and possibly other anthelmintics on reducing HIV/AIDS transmission among women in their reproductive years. Additional social science research on gender inequalities for NTDs is also urgently needed. Finally, it has been pointed out that in developing countries women are “key agents of change” whose role could be expanded to further promote social mobilization, including ensuring compliance in community-based drug distribution and treatment programs for NTDs as well as in vector control [51]. Increasingly, the NTD community needs to enlist the support of women throughout the developing world as a critical part of ensuring access to essential medicines against the NTDs. Both the WHO's Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases and a new Global Network for Neglected Tropical Diseases have placed the empowerment of women as a top priority in its pursuit of widespread coverage for the most common NTDs, including soil-transmitted helminth infections, schistosomiasis, LF, and onchocerciasis [2], while new initiatives devoted to research and development by WHO-TDR are currently championing gender issues [39]. Simultaneously, both WHO-TDR and nonprofit product development partnerships, including the Human Hookworm Vaccine Initiative through the Sabin Vaccine Institute, will champion the inclusion of women in the clinical development of new drugs, diagnostics, and vaccines. Such activities create a robust opportunity to prioritize the control of NTDs and NTD research and development and designate these activities as key enabling mechanisms for advancing women's reproductive and maternal health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Control of neglected tropical diseases.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incorporating a Rapid-Impact Package for Neglected Tropical Diseases with Programs for HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria

            Hotez et al. argue that achieving success in the global fight against HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria may well require a concurrent attack on the neglected tropical diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hookworm-Related Anaemia among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review

              Introduction Anaemia is a major factor in women's health, especially reproductive health in developing countries. Severe anaemia during pregnancy is an important contributor to maternal mortality [1], as well as to the low birth weight which is in turn an important risk factor for infant mortality [2]–[3]. Even moderate anaemia makes women less able to work and care for their children [4]. The causes of anaemia are multi-factorial, including diet, infection and genetics, and for some of the commonest causes of anaemia there is good evidence of the effectiveness of simple interventions: for example, iron supplementation [5], long-lasting insecticide nets and intermittent preventive treatment for malaria [6]–[7]. Hookworm infection has long been recognized among the major causes of anaemia in poor communities [8], but understanding of the benefits of the management of hookworm infection in pregnancy has lagged behind the other major causes of maternal anaemia. An epidemiological study in 1995 highlighted the paradox presented to public health workers that an estimated one-third of all pregnant women in developing countries were infected with hookworm and yet, in the absence of safety data, the appropriate advice then current was to avoid the use of anthelmintics in pregnancy [9]. Furthermore, the lack of an acceptable intervention constrained the development of evidence-based understanding of the impact of hookworm infection on maternal anaemia [10]. These issues were addressed directly by de Silva and colleagues [11], who analysed the safety profile of some 20 years of mebendazole use in antenatal clinics in Sri Lanka. In 2002, WHO published new guidance indicating that pregnant women should be treated for hookworm infection, ideally after the first trimester [12]. This immediately provided the opportunity for improved service delivery, and also encouraged studies to assess the contribution of hookworm to anaemia in pregnancy and the impact of treatment, some of which have been undertaken since 2002. These provide a rich new source of data to help inform public health decision making, and in this paper we present a systematic review of hookworm as a risk factor for anaemia among pregnant women. We also estimate the extent of the problem of hookworm among pregnant women living in sub-Saharan Africa, where hookworm remains an intractable reproductive health problem. Methods Data sources and search strategy A systematic search of published articles was undertaken in July 2007 and repeated again in October 2007. The online databases MEDLINE (1970–2007) and EMBASE (1980–2007) were used to identify relevant studies, using the Medical Subject Headings (MSHs) pregnancy or pregnant AND hookworm, Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duodenale, intestinal parasites, geohelminths or soil-transmitted helminths AND an(a)emia, h(a)emoglobin or h(a)ematocrit. All permutations of MSHs were entered and each search was conducted twice to ensure accuracy. The search did not exclude non-English language papers. The abstracts of returned articles were then reviewed, and if they did not explicitly investigate the association between hookworm and anaemia, they were discarded. Potentially useful articles were retrieved. We also reviewed reference lists of identified articles and hand searched reviews. Where suitable papers did not provide information in a relevant format, authors were emailed and requested to provide relevant summaries of data. SB undertook the literature search and scanned the results for potentially relevant studies, retrieved the full article, and contacted authors. SB and PJH independently assessed every relevant paper, with no disagreements arising, and SB used a pre-formed database to abstract information. We followed the reporting checklist of the Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group [13]. The primary outcome analysis was haemoglobin concentration (Hb), and our hypothesis was that haemoglobin concentration is associated with the intensity of hookworm infection. Data without quantitative measures of Hb and hookworm infection intensity were excluded. No distinction could be made between the two different hookworm species, Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale, because none of the studies used specific methods to differentiate the species, and routine coprology is unable to do this. Studies had to be based on at least 30 individuals. No scoring of quality of studies was undertaken. However, a description of statistical methods employed, including whether adjustment for potentially confounding variables, is provided. For randomised controlled trials, information is provided on key components of study design as recommended by the CONSORT statement [14]. Data analysis Data were stratified according to the intensity of infection, based on thresholds recommended by WHO: light (1–1,999 epg); moderate (2,000–3,999 epg); and heavy (4000+ epg). Estimates of Hb were assessed for each intensity category and differences between categories were presented as a standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval. These were calculated with a random-effects model according to the DerSimonian and Laird method [15]. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 test with values greater than 50% representing significant heterogeneity. When heterogeneity between studies was found to be significant, pooled estimates were based on random-effect models and the Hedges method of pooling. Results were displayed visually in forest plots. Bias was investigated by construction of funnel plots and by the statistical tests developed by Begg & Mazumdar [16] and Egger et al. [17]. Analysis was performed using the ‘metan’ and related functions in STATA version 10 (College Station, TX). Estimating population at-risk of hookworm-related anaemia We attempted to estimate the number of pregnant women infected with hookworm in hookworm-endemic countries in sub-Saharan Africa. To estimate the number of pregnant women, we used population data from the Gridded Population of the World (GPW) version 3.0 β [18]. GPW3.0β is a global human population distribution map derived from areal weighting of census data from 364,111 administrative units to a 2.5′×2.5′ spatial resolution grid. Country-specific medium variant population growth rates and proportions of the female population aged 15–49 years available from the United Nations Population Division – World Population Prospects [UNPD-WPP] database [19] were used to project this age cohort of the population total to 2005 using ArcView (Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., CA, USA). The number of pregnant women was estimated separately for each country from the crude birth rate (number of births over a given period divided by the person-years lived by the population over that period); this will be an under-estimate as it does not include women experiencing miscarriages and stillbirths, which are not routinely reported. Hookworm prevalence was defined on the basis of an existing model which uses satellite-derived climatic factors to predict the geographical distribution and prevalence of hookworm among school-aged children [20]. In the absence of relevant empirical data, we assume that infection prevalence is equivalent in school-aged populations and pregnant women; this is probably an under-estimate since hookworm prevalence is generally higher in adult populations [21]. We also assume that no large-scale hookworm control has been undertaken. Extractions of population at risk by prevalence of hookworm were then conducted in ArcView 3.2. Results Our literature searches identified 105 citations and from this list 30 potentially relevant research studies were identified; the remaining citations were either research studies among non-pregnant women, reviews or editorials. Of these 30 potentially relevant studies, 19 were determined to be eligible, including 13 cross-sectional studies, 2 randomised controlled trials, 2 non-randomised treatment trials and 2 observational studies. Association between hookworm infection and haemoglobin 13 studies presented observational data on the relationship between hookworm infection and haemoglobin concentration: eight from Africa, three from Asia and two from Latin America. The characteristics of the cross-sectional studies included are presented in Table 1. The data were stratified according to the intensity of infection. In four of the studies, none of the woman included had an intensity of infection that exceeded 2,000 epg; in eight studies women had an infection intensity that exceeded 4,000 epg. Comparing uninfected women and women lightly (1–1,999 epg) infected with hookworm, the standardized mean difference (SMD) in Hb was −0.72 (95% CI: −1.26 to −0.18) (n = 13), indicating that even women lightly infected with hookworm have lower Hb levels than uninfected women. However, there was variation in the differences observed and examination of forest plots suggested heterogeneity of effect, which was statistically significant (I2 score of 72.9%). This was explained by inclusion of the study by Rodríguez-Morales et al. [22] which collated data from nine states across Venezuela. Omitting this study from the analysis, the SMD between women uninfected and lightly infected was −0.24 (95% CI: −0.36 to −0.13) (Figure 1). Omission of other studies made little or no difference to the overall effect. There was slight evidence of bias using the Egger test (p = 0.008) and the Begg test (p = 0.07): the relatively small study by Ayoya et al. [23] in Mali showed evidence of effects that differed from the larger studies. Heavy hookworm infection was also significantly associated with a lower Hb level compared to light infection: the standardized mean difference in Hb was −0.57 (95% CI: −0.87 to −0.26) (n = 7) (Figure 2). No evidence of bias was observed. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000291.g001 Figure 1 Forest plot of the difference in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration among pregnant women uninfected with hookworm and women harbouring a light (1–1,999 eggs/gram) hookworm infection. Standardised mean difference less than zero indicate lower Hb levels in lightly infected women compared to uninfected women. The diamond represents the overall pooled estimates of the effect of light hookworm infection on Hb. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000291.g002 Figure 2 Forest plot of the difference in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration among pregnant women women harbouring a light (1–1,999 eggs/gram) hookworm infection and women harbouring a heavy (4,000+ eggs/gram) infection. Standardised mean difference less than zero indicate lower Hb levels in heavily infected women compared to lightly infected women. The diamond represents the overall pooled estimates of the effect of heavy hookworm infection on Hb. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000291.t001 Table 1 The impact of hookworm infection on haemoglobin concentration in pregnant women. Setting Participants and year of study Prevalence of parasites (%)a Prevalence of anaemia (threshold used) Statistical methods and potential confounders adjusted fora Study Liberia 128 women attending antenatal clinic aged 14–43 y, 88% in 1st or 2nd trimester, 1985 Hw = 30.0 78% ( g/L, gestational age g/L, gestational age <18–26 weeks at baseline, and not received treatment for 6 months 500 mg MBZ 60 mg ferrous sulphate daily for 1 month No difference in maternal anaemia or mean birthweight between groups; however, lower prevalence of very low birthweight babies in MBZ group Non-randomised intervention trials [27] Cote d'Ivoire Hw = 50 Al = 78% NAc Non-randomised drug trial Women aged 15–38 y attending antenatal clinic 500 mg Pyrantel pamoate daily for three days Decrease in severe anaemia and 6-month infant mortality; increase in birthweight [28] Sri Lanka Hw = 41.4 65.4% Non-randomised intervention trial of iron supplementation and anthelmintics (n = 115) Randomly selected pregnant plantation workers Unspecified (probably MBZ) 60 mg ferrous sulphate and 0.25 mf folic acid daily for 1–2 months Anthelmintic treatment in addition to iron supplementation improved Hb more than iron supplementation alone Observational studies [29] Nepal Hw = 74% Al = 59% Tt = 5% NA Non-randomised community-based study investigating receipt of ABZ and health (No doses = 58; One dose = 543; Two doses = 2726) Pregnant women previously enrolled in a cluster-randomised trial followed up 6 months post-delivery. 400 mg ABZ Decrease in severe anaemia and 6-month infant mortality; increase in birthweight [30] India NA 68.7% Pre-post (18 months) community based evaluation (n = 828) of deworming and iron-folate supplementation. Randomly selected pregnant women from two areas (one intervention; one control). 100 mg MBZ twice daily for three days plus 60 mg ferrous sulphate from fourth month of pregnancy Improvement in Hb (6.4–8.4 g/L according to trimester) Adapted and expanded from [60]. a Hw = hookworm; Al = Ascaris lumbricoides; Tt = Trichuris trichiura; b Defined as Hb<110 g/L; c Not available. The two non-randomised intervention trials presented data on the impact of anthelmintic treatment on Hb. A study in Cote d'Ivoire included 32 pregnant women treated with pyrantel pamoate and showed that the prevalence of hookworm decreased by 93% and Hb increased by 6 g/L over the course of the pregnancy [27]. A study in Sri Lanka also showed that treatment increased Hb in pregnant women, and found that providing both mebendazole and iron supplementation had a greater impact on Hb than iron supplementation alone [28]. The observational study in Nepal compared women who had received anthelmintic treatment to those who did not, and found that treatment had significant beneficial effects on severe anaemia, birthweight and infant mortality [29]. The other observational study on pregnant women, in India, also found that co-administration of mebendazole and iron supplementation resulted in improved Hb [30]. Burden of hookworm in pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Using GPW3.0β population estimates and country-specific age-sex structures, we estimate that in 2005 there were 148 million women of reproductive age (15–49 years) in hookworm endemic countries in SSA. Overlaying this surface with our model of hookworm prevalence we estimate that 37.7 million women of reproductive age are infected with hookworm. On the basis of number of live births occurring in SSA, we estimated that the number of pregnant women in SSA in 2005 was 25.9 million of which approximately 6.9 million were infected with hookworm. Discussion That human hookworm infection results in intestinal blood loss which, in turn, can contribute to anaemia is well-established [8]. What has remained unclear and hindered public health policy and planning is the extent to which hookworm is associated with anaemia during pregnancy. The results of our systematic review quantify this relationship and confirm that heavy intensities of hookworm infection are associated with lower levels of haemoglobin than light infection intensities. This finding corroborates previous studies among school-aged children that show a relationship between infection intensity and haemoglobin [31]–[33]. Over forty years ago, Roche & Layrisse [31] in their seminal study on hookworm anaemia identified four conditions necessary to show an association between hookworm infection and Hb: a large sample size; quantitative measures of haemoglobin and hookworm infection; sufficient variation in infection levels; and few other competing causes of anaemia. These conditions are also relevant to interpreting the current results: in particular, the absence of estimates of hookworm intensity resulted in the exclusion of studies, some of which, reported no association between hookworm infection and the risk of anaemia [34]–[36]; while others reported a significant association [37]–[38]. Anaemia in developing countries has multiple causes, including micro-nutrient deficiencies, infectious diseases and inherited disorders [39], and as such, the observed relationship between Hb and hookworm infection may be confounded by other causes of anaemia. Furthermore, residual confounding may exist among studies which did not adjust for socio-economic status, which may lead to an overestimation of association. However, nine of the 13 studies undertook some form of analysis which adjusted for potential confounding variables, including dietary intake, gestation age, and co-infections (Table 1), thereby adding weight to the observed associations; only four studies adjusted for socio-economic status. The contribution of hookworm infection to maternal anaemia is such that all women of child-bearing age could benefit from periodic treatment in hookworm endemic areas, and that women harbouring the heaviest infections are likely to benefit most. Previously, a systematic review of randomised controlled trials investigating the impact of anthelmintic treatment on haemoglobin among school-aged children concluded that treatment against intestinal nematode infections resulted in an increase in haemoglobin of 1.71 g/L (95% confidence intervals 0.70–2.73) [40]. However, there were a number of important omissions in the study, including the failure to distinguished between different helminth species or account for intensity of infection, which may have under-estimated the true treatment effect [41]. The treatment studies among pregnant women reported here found that albendazole was effective in reducing the decline in haemoglobin that typically occurs during pregnancy [25], but that the effect was less apparent with mebendazole [24]. This may reflect the lower efficacy of mebendazole versus albendazole in treating hookworm infection [42],[43]. However, there is a trade-off between efficacy and safety since mebendazole is poorly absorbed from the gut whereas albendazole is turned into a sulfoxide metabolite that gets widely distributed in the tissues. In addition to drugs used, there are other potential reasons accounting for the difference in the observed impact of anthelmintic treatment on haemoglobin. These include higher intensities of hookworm among women in Peru than among the women in the Sierra Leone study. In addition, different underlying aetiologies of anaemia may be relevant, such differences in iron deficiency anaemia and malaria and schistosome transmission intensity [39]. Finally, although we did not quantitatively assess the quality of the studies, reporting of the RCT in Sierra Leone was incomplete and it is possible that there were methodological differences that were associated with observed treatment effects [14]. Despite the potential benefits of anthelmintic treatment during pregnancy, few countries have included deworming in their routine antenatal care (ANC) programmes, with only Madagascar, Nepal and Sri Lanka doing so routinely. It is suggested that a fear of adverse birth outcomes as well as a lack of safety data, especially country-specific data, represents a barrier for many ministries of health including anthelmintics into their ANC programmes. The evidence from the RCTs included in this review found no evidence of an increased risk of adverse events following treatement. This is consistent with other observational studies which have investigated the safety of mebendazole in pregnant women (for a recent review of studies, see [26]). We feel that the findings of the present paper make clear that hookworm in pregnancy is prevalent and important, and we strongly encourage that a substantial review of the safety evidence is undertaken, perhaps by WHO and its partners. The finding that co-administration of deworming and iron supplements has a greater impact on haemoglobin than deworming alone supports the assertion that deworming is unlikely to replenish iron stores in the short term, and needs to be combined with iron supplementation, particularly among populations whose diets is low in bioavailable iron [10]. In addition, a review of the impact of malaria-related anaemia among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa suggested that over a quarter of cases of severe anaemia were attributable to malaria [44], while other evidence shows that anaemia burden can be reduced effectively by anti-malarial intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) [7]. An effective package to improve maternal anaemia should therefore ideally include IPT, iron supplementation and anthelmintic treatment. Interestingly, a recent case control study of the causation of severe anaemia in young children in Malawi also concludes that hookworm has tended to be overlooked as a causal factor [45]. The value of combining deworming with micronutrient supplementation for children has previously been emphasized [46]. We found only slight evidence of publication bias, and this is likely to be less important than the numerous other factors that may introduce heterogeneity [17], such as transmission of malaria and schistosomiasis, iron and nutritional intake, diagnostic accuracy in quantifying Hb and hookworm intensity. Furthermore, hookworm species may be important but in the reported studies, no distinction was made between N. americanus and A. duodenale because of the practical difficulties of differential diagnosis. Pathological studies indicate that A. duodenale causes greater blood loss than N. americanus [47], with epidemiological studies among Zanzibari schoolchildren suggesting that A. duodenale is associated with an increased risk of anaemia [48]. Thus, where hookworm is exclusively A.duodenale, such as in Nepal [49], the observed effect on maternal anaemia might be greater. In 1995, Bundy and colleagues estimated that in low income countries, 44 million (35.5%) out of 124 million pregnant women were infected with hookworm [9]. Here we estimate that 6.9 million (26.7%) out of 25.9 million pregnant women in SSA are infected with hookworm. Our current estimates are more precise since they are the first to explicitly include the fine spatial variation in distribution of both infection and population. They suggest that the earlier methodology may have overestimated the proportion of pregnant women infected. On the other hand, the reliance on infection prevalence data from surveys of schoolchildren, in the absence of data from adult women, means that both estimation procedures are likely to result in under-estimates. Nonetheless, the estimates suggest that between a quarter and a third of pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa are infected with hookworm and therefore at risk of preventable hookworm-related anaemia. In conclusion, this systematic review presents evidence that increasing hookworm infection intensity is associated with lower haemoglobin levels in pregnant women in poor countries. The chronic and recurring nature of hookworm infection throughout the reproductive years means that it may have a chronic impact on the iron status of infected women, potentially contributing to their morbidity and mortality and that of their children. In many developing countries it is policy that pregnant women receive anthelmintic treatment but in practice coverage rates are often unacceptably low. We suggest that efforts are made to increase the coverage of anthelmintic treatment and iron supplementation, with, where appropriate, intermittent preventive treatment for malaria.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                plos
                plosntds
                PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1935-2727
                1935-2735
                November 2009
                24 November 2009
                : 3
                : 11
                : e559
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Tropical Medicine, The George Washington University, Washington, D. C., United States of America
                [2 ]Sabin Vaccine Institute, Washington, D. C., United States of America
                Author notes

                Peter J. Hotez is Editor-in-Chief of PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. He is Distinguished Research Professor, Walter G. Ross Professor, and Chair of his Department at George Washington University, and President of the Sabin Vaccine Institute.

                Article
                09-PNTD-ED-0461R2
                10.1371/journal.pntd.0000559
                2775907
                19936248
                ec2747f8-59cf-4689-9442-17ecc64ddc68
                Peter J. Hotez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                Page count
                Pages: 4
                Categories
                Editorial
                Infectious Diseases/Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Women's Health

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article