8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of COVID‐19 on a high‐volume incident learning system: A retrospective analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this work was to assess how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic impacted our incident learning system data and communicate the impact of a major exogenous event on radiation oncology clinical practice.

          Methods

          Trends in our electronic incident reporting system were analyzed to ascertain the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic, including any direct clinical changes. Incident reports submitted in the 18 months prior to the pandemic (September 14, 2018 to March 13, 2020) and reports submitted during the first 18 months of the pandemic (March 14, 2020 to September 13, 2021) were compared. The incident reports include several data elements that were evaluated for trends between the two time periods, and statistical analysis was performed to compare the proportions of reports.

          Results

          In the 18 months prior to COVID‐19, 192 reports were submitted per 1000 planning tasks ( n = 832 total). In the first 18 months of the pandemic, 147 reports per 1000 planning tasks were submitted ( n = 601 total), a decrease of 23.4%. Statistical analysis revealed that there were no significant changes among the data elements between the pre‐ and during COVID‐19 time periods. An analysis of the free‐text narratives in the reports found that phrases related to pretreatment imaging were common before COVID‐19 but not during. Conversely, phrases related to intravenous contrast, consent for computed tomography, and adaptive radiotherapy became common during COVID‐19.

          Conclusions

          The data elements captured by our incident learning system were stable after the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, with no statistically significant findings after correction for multiple comparisons. A trend toward fewer reports submitted for low‐risk issues was observed. The methods used in the work can be generalized to events with a large‐scale impact on the clinic or to monitor an incident learning system to drive future improvement activities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Practice recommendations for risk-adapted head and neck cancer radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ASTRO-ESTRO consensus statement

            Introduction Due to the unprecedented disruption of health care services by the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) identified an urgent need to issue practice recommendations for radiation oncologists treating head and neck cancer (HNC), in a time of heightened risk for patients and staff, and of limited resources. Methods A panel of international experts from ASTRO, ESTRO and select Asia-Pacific countries completed a modified rapid Delphi process. Questions and topics were presented to the group, and subsequent questions developed from iterative feedback. Each survey was open online for 24 hours, and successive rounds started within 24 hours of the previous round. The chosen cutoffs for strong agreement (≥80%) and agreement (≥66%) were extrapolated from the RAND methodology. Two pandemic scenarios: early (risk mitigation) and late (severely reduced radiotherapy resources) were evaluated. The panel developed treatment recommendations for five HNC cases. Results In total, 29/31 (94%) of those invited accepted, and after a replacement 30/30 completed all three surveys (100% response rate). There was agreement or strong agreement across a number of practice areas including: treatment prioritisation, whether to delay initiation or interrupt radiotherapy for intercurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection, approaches to treatment (radiation dose-fractionation schedules and use of chemotherapy in each pandemic scenario), management of surgical cases in event of operating room closures, and recommended adjustments to outpatient clinic appointments and supportive care. Conclusions This urgent practice recommendation was issued in the knowledge of the very difficult circumstances in which our patients find themselves at present, navigating strained health care systems functioning with limited resources and at heightened risk to their health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this consensus statement is to ensure high-quality HNC treatments continue, to save lives and for symptomatic benefit.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Letter from Italy: First practical indications for radiation therapy departments during COVID-19 outbreak

              Introduction The number of people infected by SARS-CoV-2 is dramatically increasing worldwide. 1 The first person-to-person transmission in Italy was reported on February 21, 2020, and led to an infection chain that represents the largest outbreak outside Asia to date. 2 As of March 12, 2020, in Italy, there are 10,590 positive patients, 827 deaths, and 1045 healed, with numbers varying from hour to hour. The COrona VIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) incubation interval varies from 5 to 14 days. 3 On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency of international concern, and the Italian government declared a public health emergency the next day. In the first phase, the government defined areas at different risk of infection: (1) high risk (“red zone or level 1 risk zone”); (2) mean risk (level 2 risk zone); and (3) the rest of the national territory, to be on alert but considered at low risk (level 3 risk zone). In the subsequent phases of the crisis, following the indications of a scientific and technical committee and in agreement with the WHO, the government finally decided to extend the “red zone” to the whole nation (March 8, 2020). All public hospitals faced an unprecedented emergency, with drastic changes in all organizational processes. All patients with cancer were consequently involved at different levels. We here report the experience of a group of Northern Italy radiation therapy departments that are located inside or very close to the first red zone and thus were the first to face the emergency. The main problem was how to continue activity while protecting patients, families, and health professionals from COVID-19. The authors met virtually with other radiation oncologists (see Acknowledgments) to share experiences and possible solutions, which were defined according to the local and national health authorities' indications. The indications we propose are structured as (1) definition of priorities, (2) problem analysis, and (3) suggested solutions. Priority 1: To Ensure Radiation Therapy Delivery To Patients with Cancer Problem analysis Radiation therapy is a life-saving treatment and should be guaranteed to all patients with cancer for whom it is indicated. 4 Suggested solutions Regional and hospital management must ensure the full functioning of Italian radiation therapy facilities, even in emergency conditions. Priority 2: To Ensure Safety of Health Professionals, Patients, and Caregivers Problem analysis A widespread infection among the staff working in a radiation therapy facility would effectively result in the closure of part of the activities. Failure to identify suspected or infected patients would increase the risk of spread to operators and patients undergoing treatment. Suggested solutions 1. If a triage point at the entrance to the hospital has not been activated, the indication is to carry out triage at access to the radiation therapy department to verify possible contact with COVID-19–positive patients and evaluate suspected symptoms in all others (patients, caregivers) accessing radiation therapy areas. 2. Provide a hydroalcoholic solution for hand disinfection at the entrance of the radiation therapy center. 3. Wear surgical masks, as recommended for all health professionals and patients according to WHO indications 5 and in particular if (1) the operator has respiratory symptoms, to protect others; and (2) if the operator is in close contact with a person who has respiratory symptoms, to protect herself or himself. 4. Use sterile disposable overalls (tunic and trousers), sterile disposable gown, FFP2 masks, clogs, and overshoes when treating patients with highly suspected or verified COVID-19, if they need to continue radiation therapy according to medical indications. Priority 3: Management of COVID-19 Suspected or Positive Patients Problem analysis We need practical guidelines on the appropriate behavior in the case of symptomatic, suspected, or verified COVID-19 patients accessing radiation therapy facilities. The triage evaluation should immediately report to the appropriate internal structures all patients who have symptoms possibly related to COVID-19, according to the existing regional regulations. Suggested solutions 1. If the patient has a cough, fever, or dyspnea owing to pre-existing morbidity, the patient should wear a protective mask, and radiation therapy should be continued. 2. If a new patient has confirmed COVID-19, do not start treatment. 3. If a patient on treatment is suspected to have onset of typical COVID-19 symptoms (cough and/or fever and/or dyspnea) and is waiting for diagnosis, stop treatment.∗ 4. If a patient on treatment is positive and is symptomatic, discontinue treatment.∗ 5. If a patient on treatment is positive but is asymptomatic, discontinue treatment.∗ 6. If a patient had confrimed COVID-19 but is declared healed by the infectious disease team, carefully plan to start or restart treatment according to cancer-related clinical conditions. If possible, COVID-19 patients should be treated at the end of the linear accelerator shift to limit the chances of infection for other patients. For confirmed COVID-19 patients (or patients waiting for diagnostic confirmation), the waiting and bunker areas should be sanitized at the end of the treatment session. Priority 4: Staff Reorganization Problem analysis It is necessary to avoid the usual professional behavior that favors the aggregation of all professional figures (medical doctors, nurses, therapists, physicists, administrative staff) working in the radiation therapy facility. Suggested solutions Medical, technical, nursing, physics and administrative staff must operate in separate areas, avoiding meetings that cannot ensure the safety distances required for prevention. In the event of infection of health professionals and therefore in the case of a severe shortage of staff: 1. report the current situation to the hospital management for help in solving the problem (eg, hiring new staff); 2. connect with other radiation therapy centers for external personnel to avoid interruption of ongoing therapies; 3. call for the service of retired personnel following the procedures already defined by the administrations; 4. redistribute patients to available machines—variation of fractionation, when feasible, is advised. Priority 5: Reduction of Patients' Access to Radiation Therapy Facilities Problem analysis It is advisable to limit the patients' access to the radiation therapy departments while maintaining optimal care conditions. Suggested solutions 1. Adopt hypofractionated regimens when possible. 2. Postpone follow-up visits. 3. Use palliative medical treatments at home instead of radiation therapy, when deemed to be of similar efficacy. 4. Delay nonurgent and deferrable radiation therapy treatments for patients with a better prognosis (eg, adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with breast cancer, radical radiation therapy for patients with low/intermediate-risk prostate disease). 5. Postpone therapies for benign and functional diseases. Discussion The COVID-19 spread in Italy was initially subtle and then unexpectedly rapid in its expansion. Because the first affected regions (especially Lombardia) were characterized by a very high population density, the virus dramatically spread throughout Northern Italy in a few weeks. As a consequence, all cancer therapy flows were altered: surgery, systemic therapies, and radiation therapy. The radiation therapy centers located in the hospitals that were the first to face the emergency gained rapid field experience and started monitoring the situation and collecting data. This report presents a few practical suggestions from the first 2 weeks of collective work under emergency conditions and is the result of a joint effort to ensure continuity of therapies while protecting patients, health professionals, and the general population. The indications were integrated with the WHO recommendations and with the local health authorities’ guidelines. The primary aim was to share information and provide guidance to radiation therapy departments worldwide. The report is mainly focused on how to deal with symptomatic, suspect, or confirmed COVID-19 patients undergoing radiation therapy. We identified five key priorities, here described, together with a brief analysis of the problems and the possible solutions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jacqmin@humonc.wisc.edu
                Journal
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                10.1002/(ISSN)1526-9914
                ACM2
                Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1526-9914
                26 May 2022
                July 2022
                : 23
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/acm2.v23.7 )
                : e13653
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Human Oncology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Dustin J. Jacqmin, Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin‐Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

                Email: jacqmin@ 123456humonc.wisc.edu

                Article
                ACM213653
                10.1002/acm2.13653
                9278685
                35616007
                eba02cae-bd06-4b28-b7da-e5950d3a1037
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 April 2022
                : 15 February 2022
                : 02 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, Pages: 11, Words: 6856
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health , doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: Cancer Center Support Grant: P30 CA014520
                Categories
                Management and Profession
                Management and Profession
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:13.07.2022

                incident learning,covid‐19,radiotherapy
                incident learning, covid‐19, radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article