6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primary care model based on this collaboration.

          Methods

          The intervention is medical education on SCI related topics offered by specialists to GPs practicing in rural areas. Outcomes are assessed and analyzed in physicians and patients. Group allocation of persons with SCI follows intention-to-treat principle with intervention group being those in close proximity to a participating GP.

          Results

          It is expected that ten GPs and sixteen specialists will take part in the study's intervention. An average difference in “Doctor's opinion on collaboration questionnaire” score (mean 44; SD ± 12) from baseline after two years post-intervention in the group of participating GPs is hypothesized at P-value level <0.05; meanwhile, the control group remains at an average score of 56. Of persons with SCI (n = 395), 230 are expected to take part in the study at baseline. An average modified “Spinal Cord Injury-Secondary Conditions Scale” change in score from baseline to 24 months post intervention is expected to fall from 12.0 to 9.0 in the intervention group and to stay at 12.0 in the control group.

          Conclusion

          The study aims to improve patients' outcomes and providers’ experience with delivery of care for persons with SCI, as compared to current best practice.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04071938. Registered August 28, 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04071938.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors

            The epidemiological transition calls for redefining the roles of the various professionals involved in primary health care towards greater collaboration. We aimed to identify facilitators of, and barriers to, interprofessional collaboration in primary health care as perceived by the actors involved, other than nurses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health conditions in people with spinal cord injury: Contemporary evidence from a population-based community survey in Switzerland.

              Health conditions in people with spinal cord injury are major determinants for disability, reduced well-being, and mortality. However, population-based evidence on the prevalence and treatment of health conditions in people with spinal cord injury is scarce.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Contemp Clin Trials Commun
                Contemp Clin Trials Commun
                Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
                Elsevier
                2451-8654
                17 November 2021
                December 2021
                17 November 2021
                : 24
                : 100873
                Affiliations
                [a ]University of Lucerne, Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, Frohburgstrasse 3, 6002, Lucerne, Switzerland
                [b ]Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Str. 4, 6207, Nottwil, Switzerland
                [c ]Center for Primary and Community Care, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, 6002, Lucerne, Switzerland
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author.Center for Primary and Community Care, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, 6002, Lucerne, Switzerland. rebecca.tomaschek@ 123456unilu.ch
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Strasse 4, 6207, Nottwil, Switzerland. dima.touhami@ 123456paraplegie.ch
                [1]

                Shared first authorship.

                Article
                S2451-8654(21)00173-3 100873
                10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100873
                8617342
                34869940
                eac33217-5443-4e09-925e-9038244f8379
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 May 2021
                : 18 October 2021
                : 13 November 2021
                Categories
                Article

                primary care,model of care,collaboration,general practitioners,specialists,spinal cord injury

                Comments

                Comment on this article