90
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Balancing trade-offs between biotic and abiotic stress responses through leaf age-dependent variation in stress hormone cross-talk

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Plants are exposed to conflicting stresses simultaneously in nature. As stress responses are costly, plants likely coordinate these responses to minimize fitness costs. The nature and extent to which plants employ inducible mechanisms to cope with combined physical and biological stresses remains unknown. We identify a genetic mechanism by which leaves of distinct ages differentially control stress-response cross-talk. At the organism level, this mechanism balances stress-response trade-offs to maintain plant growth and reproduction during combined stresses. We also show that this leaf age-dependent stress-response prioritization influences the establishment of plant-associated leaf bacterial communities. This study illustrates the importance of active balancing of stress-response trade-offs for plant fitness maintenance and for interaction with the plant microbiota.

          Abstract

          In nature, plants must respond to multiple stresses simultaneously, which likely demands cross-talk between stress-response pathways to minimize fitness costs. Here we provide genetic evidence that biotic and abiotic stress responses are differentially prioritized in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves of different ages to maintain growth and reproduction under combined biotic and abiotic stresses. Abiotic stresses, such as high salinity and drought, blunted immune responses in older rosette leaves through the phytohormone abscisic acid signaling, whereas this antagonistic effect was blocked in younger rosette leaves by PBS3, a signaling component of the defense phytohormone salicylic acid. Plants lacking PBS3 exhibited enhanced abiotic stress tolerance at the cost of decreased fitness under combined biotic and abiotic stresses. Together with this role, PBS3 is also indispensable for the establishment of salt stress- and leaf age-dependent phyllosphere bacterial communities. Collectively, our work reveals a mechanism that balances trade-offs upon conflicting stresses at the organism level and identifies a genetic intersection among plant immunity, leaf microbiota, and abiotic stress tolerance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence.

          Salicylic acid (SA) mediates plant defences against pathogens, accumulating in both infected and distal leaves in response to pathogen attack. Pathogenesis-related gene expression and the synthesis of defensive compounds associated with both local and systemic acquired resistance (LAR and SAR) in plants require SA. In Arabidopsis, exogenous application of SA suffices to establish SAR, resulting in enhanced resistance to a variety of pathogens. However, despite its importance in plant defence against pathogens, SA biosynthesis is not well defined. Previous work has suggested that plants synthesize SA from phenylalanine; however, SA could still be produced when this pathway was inhibited, and the specific activity of radiolabelled SA in feeding experiments was often lower than expected. Some bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa synthesize SA using isochorismate synthase (ICS) and pyruvate lyase. Here we show, by cloning and characterizing an Arabidopsis defence-related gene (SID2) defined by mutation, that SA is synthesized from chorismate by means of ICS, and that SA made by this pathway is required for LAR and SAR responses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Microbial Interkingdom Interactions in Roots Promote Arabidopsis Survival

            Summary Roots of healthy plants are inhabited by soil-derived bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes that have evolved independently in distinct kingdoms of life. How these microorganisms interact and to what extent those interactions affect plant health are poorly understood. We examined root-associated microbial communities from three Arabidopsis thaliana populations and detected mostly negative correlations between bacteria and filamentous microbial eukaryotes. We established microbial culture collections for reconstitution experiments using germ-free A. thaliana. In plants inoculated with mono- or multi-kingdom synthetic microbial consortia, we observed a profound impact of the bacterial root microbiota on fungal and oomycetal community structure and diversity. We demonstrate that the bacterial microbiota is essential for plant survival and protection against root-derived filamentous eukaryotes. Deconvolution of 2,862 binary bacterial-fungal interactions ex situ, combined with community perturbation experiments in planta, indicate that biocontrol activity of bacterial root commensals is a redundant trait that maintains microbial interkingdom balance for plant health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity

              Plants live in biogeochemically diverse soils that harbor extraordinarily diverse microbiota. Plant organs associate intimately with a subset of these microbes; this community’s structure can be altered by soil nutrient content. Plant-associated microbes can compete with the plant and with each other for nutrients; they can also provide traits that increase plant productivity. It is unknown how the plant immune system coordinates microbial recognition with nutritional cues during microbiome assembly. We establish that a genetic network controlling phosphate stress response influences root microbiome community structure, even under non-stress phosphate conditions. We define a molecular mechanism regulating coordination between nutrition and defense in the presence of a synthetic bacterial community. We demonstrate that the master transcriptional regulators of phosphate stress response in Arabidopsis also directly repress defense, consistent with plant prioritization of nutritional stress over defense. Our work will impact efforts to define and deploy useful microbes to enhance plant performance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                5 February 2019
                23 January 2019
                23 January 2019
                : 116
                : 6
                : 2364-2373
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research , 50829 Cologne, Germany;
                [2] bDepartment of Molecular Signal Processing, Leibnitz Institute of Plant Biochemistry , 06120 Halle, Germany;
                [3] cCluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research , 50829 Cologne, Germany
                Author notes
                4To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: schlef@ 123456mpipz.mpg.de or tsuda@ 123456mpipz.mpg.de .

                Contributed by Paul Schulze-Lefert, December 10, 2018 (sent for review October 8, 2018; reviewed by Xinnian Dong and Murray R. Grant)

                Author contributions: M.L.B., P.S.-L., and K.T. designed research; M.L.B., K.W.W., J.Z., A.N., V.K., T.M.W., Y.W., and D.B. performed research; R.G.-O. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.L.B., K.W.W., S.S., J.Z., T.N., T.M.W., A.M., P.S.-L., and K.T. analyzed data; and M.L.B., P.S.-L., and K.T. wrote the paper.

                Reviewers: X.D., Duke University; and M.R.G., University of Warwick.

                1Present address: Albrecht-von-Haller-Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, D–37073 Göttingen, Germany.

                2Present address: Institut für Biologie und Biotechnologie der Pflanzen, Westfälische Wilhelms Universität, 48149 Münster, Germany.

                3Present address: Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, 525-8577 Shiga, Japan.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-9039
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-0731
                Article
                201817233
                10.1073/pnas.1817233116
                6369802
                30674663
                ea48ae9b-27fb-4835-bb00-f12c7cdd4e1b
                Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: European Research Council
                Award ID: ROOTMICROBIOTA
                Award Recipient : Paul Schulze-Lefert
                Categories
                PNAS Plus
                Biological Sciences
                Plant Biology
                PNAS Plus

                combined stress,phytohormone,plant fitness,microbiota,stress trade-off

                Comments

                Comment on this article