3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-term open-label vebicorvir for chronic HBV infection: Safety and off-treatment responses

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 14 , 14 , # , 14 , 14 , # , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27
      JHEP Reports
      Elsevier
      Hepatitis, Core inhibitor, Antiviral, Off-treatment, Open-label, Nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, Viral relapse, Hepatitis B virus

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background & Aims

          The investigational first-generation core inhibitor vebicorvir (VBR) demonstrated safety and antiviral activity over 24 weeks in two phase IIa studies in patients with chronic HBV infection. In this long-term extension study, patients received open-label VBR with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs).

          Methods

          Patients in this study (NCT03780543) previously received VBR + NrtI or placebo + NrtI in parent studies 201 (NCT03576066) or 202 (NCT03577171). After receiving VBR + NrtI for ≥52 weeks, stopping criteria (based on the treatment history and hepatitis B e antigen status in the parent studies) were applied, and patients either discontinued both VBR + NrtI, discontinued VBR only, or continued both VBR + NrtI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <20 IU/ml at 24 weeks off treatment.

          Results

          Ninety-two patients entered the extension study and received VBR + NrtI. Long-term VBR + NrtI treatment led to continued suppression of HBV nucleic acids and, to a lesser extent, HBV antigens. Forty-three patients met criteria to discontinue VBR + NrtI, with no patients achieving the primary endpoint; the majority of virologic rebound occurred ≥4 weeks off treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). There were no deaths. Most AEs and laboratory abnormalities were related to elevations in alanine aminotransferase and occurred during the off-treatment or NrtI-restart phases. No drug–drug interactions between VBR + NrtI and no cases of treatment-emergent resistance among patients who adhered to treatment were observed.

          Conclusions

          Long-term VBR + NrtI was safe and resulted in continued reductions in HBV nucleic acids following completion of the 24-week parent studies. Following treatment discontinuation, virologic relapse was observed in all patients. This first-generation core inhibitor administered with NrtI for at least 52 weeks was not sufficient for HBV cure.

          Clinical trial number

          NCT03780543.

          Impact and implications

          Approved treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) suppress viral replication, but viral rebound is almost always observed after treatment discontinuation, highlighting an unmet need for improved therapies with finite treatment duration producing greater therapeutic responses that can be sustained off treatment. First-generation core inhibitors, such as vebicorvir, have mechanisms of action orthogonal to standard-of-care therapies that deeply suppress HBV viral replication during treatment; however, to date, durable virologic responses have not been observed after treatment discontinuation. The results reported here will help researchers with the design and interpretation of future studies investigating core inhibitors as possible components of finite treatment regimens for patients with cHBV. It is possible that next-generation core inhibitors with enhanced potency may produce deeper and more durable antiviral activity than first-generation agents, including vebicorvir.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • The HBV core inhibitor vebicorvir (VBR) + NrtI was evaluated in phase II studies.

          • Long-term VBR + NrtI is generally well tolerated in patients with chronic HBV infection.

          • Reductions in HBV DNA and pgRNA were observed with long-term VBR + NrtI treatment.

          • In patients who stopped treatment, a sustained virologic response was not observed.

          • Drug–drug interactions and viral resistance were not observed in this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection.

          Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health problem with changing epidemiology due to several factors including vaccination policies and migration. This Clinical Practice Guideline presents updated recommendations for the optimal management of HBV infection. Chronic HBV infection can be classified into five phases: (I) HBeAg-positive chronic infection, (II) HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis, (III) HBeAg-negative chronic infection, (IV) HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis and (V) HBsAg-negative phase. All patients with chronic HBV infection are at increased risk of progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), depending on host and viral factors. The main goal of therapy is to improve survival and quality of life by preventing disease progression, and consequently HCC development. The induction of long-term suppression of HBV replication represents the main endpoint of current treatment strategies, while HBsAg loss is an optimal endpoint. The typical indication for treatment requires HBV DNA >2,000IU/ml, elevated ALT and/or at least moderate histological lesions, while all cirrhotic patients with detectable HBV DNA should be treated. Additional indications include the prevention of mother to child transmission in pregnant women with high viremia and prevention of HBV reactivation in patients requiring immunosuppression or chemotherapy. The long-term administration of a potent nucleos(t)ide analogue with high barrier to resistance, i.e., entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil or tenofovir alafenamide, represents the treatment of choice. Pegylated interferon-alfa treatment can also be considered in mild to moderate chronic hepatitis B patients. Combination therapies are not generally recommended. All treated and untreated patients should be monitored for treatment response and adherence, and the risk of progression and development of complications. HCC remains the major concern for treated chronic hepatitis B patients. Several subgroups of patients with HBV infection require specific focus. Future treatment strategies to achieve 'cure' of disease and new biomarkers are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Peginterferon Alfa-2a, lamivudine, and the combination for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.

            Current treatments for chronic hepatitis B are suboptimal. In the search for improved therapies, we compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa plus lamivudine, pegylated interferon alfa without lamivudine, and lamivudine alone for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B. A total of 814 patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B received either peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg once weekly) plus oral placebo, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (100 mg daily), or lamivudine alone. The majority of patients in the study were Asian (87 percent). Most patients were infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B or C. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks. After 24 weeks of follow-up, significantly more patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine than those who received lamivudine monotherapy had HBeAg seroconversion (32 percent vs. 19 percent [P<0.001] and 27 percent vs. 19 percent [P=0.02], respectively) or HBV DNA levels below 100,000 copies per milliliter (32 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.01] and 34 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.003], respectively). Sixteen patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a (alone or in combination) had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion, as compared with 0 in the group receiving lamivudine alone (P=0.001). The most common adverse events were those known to occur with therapies based on interferon alfa. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 percent, 6 percent, and 2 percent of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, combination therapy, and lamivudine monotherapy, respectively. Two patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy had irreversible liver failure after the cessation of treatment--one underwent liver transplantation, and the other died. In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, peginterferon alfa-2a offers superior efficacy over lamivudine, on the basis of HBeAg seroconversion, HBV DNA suppression, and HBsAg seroconversion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Combination of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Peginterferon α-2a Increases Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.

              Patients chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus rarely achieve loss of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) with the standard of care. We evaluated HBsAg loss in patients receiving the combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and peginterferon α-2a (peginterferon) for a finite duration in a randomized trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JHEP Rep
                JHEP Rep
                JHEP Reports
                Elsevier
                2589-5559
                18 January 2024
                April 2024
                18 January 2024
                : 6
                : 4
                : 100999
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine and State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, School of Clinical Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [3 ]Office of Xiaoli Ma, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [4 ]T Nguyen Research and Education, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
                [5 ]Southern California Research Center, Coronado, CA, USA
                [6 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [7 ]Toronto Liver Centre, Toronto, Canada
                [8 ]ID Care, Hillsborough, NJ, USA
                [9 ]Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
                [10 ]NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
                [11 ]Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [12 ]Pfleger Liver Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [13 ]University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
                [14 ]Assembly Biosciences, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
                [15 ]Quest Clinical Research, San Francisco, CA, USA
                [16 ]Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
                [17 ]GastroIntestinal Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
                [18 ]Medical Associates Research Group, San Diego, CA, USA
                [19 ]Gastrohealth, Catonsville, MD, USA
                [20 ]Sing Chan MD, New York, NY, USA
                [21 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Liver Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
                [22 ]Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
                [23 ]Schiff Center for Liver Diseases, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
                [24 ]Asian Pacific Liver Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [25 ]University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [26 ]Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
                [27 ]Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Address: Department of Medicine and State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, School of Clinical Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong 999077. Tel.: +852 2255 3994; Fax: +852 281 62863. mfyuen@ 123456hku.hk
                [#]

                Former employees of Assembly Biosciences, Inc.

                Article
                S2589-5559(23)00330-0 100999
                10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100999
                10951643
                38510983
                e9e7122a-aa39-4ac9-a759-8f9de5e186a0
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 17 August 2023
                : 18 December 2023
                : 20 December 2023
                Categories
                Research Article

                hepatitis,core inhibitor,antiviral,off-treatment,open-label,nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor,viral relapse,hepatitis b virus

                Comments

                Comment on this article