20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Immunogenicity and Safety of Beta-Adjuvanted Recombinant Booster Vaccine

      letter
      , M.D., Ph.D. , M.Sc. , M.D. , M.D. , M.D. , M.D., , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , Vet.D. , Pharm.D., , Pharm.D. , M.Sc., , Ph.D. , M.Sc. , M.Sc. , M.D., , Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D. , M.D., Ph.D.
      The New England Journal of Medicine
      Massachusetts Medical Society
      Keyword part (code): 18Keyword part (keyword): Infectious DiseaseKeyword part (code): 18_2Keyword part (keyword): VaccinesKeyword part (code): 18_6Keyword part (keyword): Viral InfectionsKeyword part (code): 18_12Keyword part (keyword): Coronavirus , 18, Infectious Disease, Keyword part (code): 18_2Keyword part (keyword): VaccinesKeyword part (code): 18_6Keyword part (keyword): Viral InfectionsKeyword part (code): 18_12Keyword part (keyword): Coronavirus , 18_2, Vaccines, 18_6, Viral Infections, 18_12, Coronavirus

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: The value of variant-adapted vaccines that are capable of inducing a higher and broader immune response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at booster vaccination is currently being evaluated. 1-4 We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind trial to assess the immunogenicity and safety of two adjuvanted recombinant vaccines and the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) administered as a booster (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05124171; EudraCT number, 2021-004550-33). We randomly assigned adults with no previous diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) who had received primary vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 (with the second dose received between 3 and 7 months earlier) to receive booster vaccination with one of the following: a third dose of BNT162b2, a dose of the Sanofi–GSK SARS-CoV-2 adjuvanted recombinant protein MVD614 vaccine (monovalent formulation based on the original strain), or a dose of the SARS-CoV-2 adjuvanted recombinant protein MVB.1.351 vaccine (monovalent beta formulation; beta-adjuvanted vaccine). The primary end point was the percentage of participants who had an increase in the neutralizing-antibody titer by a factor of at least 10 between day 0 and day 15 after receipt of the booster as measured by microneutralization against the original D614 (wild-type) strain of SARS-CoV-2 or the B.1.351 (beta) variant. The primary end point was assessed in the per-protocol population, which included all the participants who underwent randomization and did not meet any of the exclusion criteria (see the protocol, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). The main other prespecified immunologic end points were the rate of increase between day 0 and day 15 in neutralizing-antibody titers against the original D614 strain and the beta, B.1.617.2 (delta), and B.1.1.529 (omicron) BA.1 variants; the geometric mean of anti-spike (anti-S1) IgG levels; and interferon-γ– and interleukin-2–secreting CD4+ T-cell response against the original strain and the omicron variant in each randomized group. Among the 247 participants who underwent randomization between December 8, 2021, and January 14, 2022, a total of 24 participants were excluded, mainly owing to preexisting immunity against SARS-CoV-2. The per-protocol population included 223 participants: 76 in the MVD614 group, 71 in the MVB.1.351 group, and 76 in the BNT162b2 group (Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org). The mean age of the participants was 40.6 years, and 40% were women. The baseline characteristics of the participants did not differ among the trial groups (Table S1). The percentage of participants who had an increase in the neutralizing-antibody titer by a factor of at least 10 between day 0 and day 15 for the original strain was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43 to 67) in the MVD614 group, 76% (95% CI, 64 to 85) in the MVB.1.351 group, and 63% (95% CI, 51 to 74) in the BNT162b2 group. For the beta variant, the corresponding percentages were 45% (95% CI, 33 to 57), 85% (95% CI, 74 to 92), and 51% (95% CI, 40 to 63). The MVB.1.351 vaccine elicited higher neutralizing-antibody titers than the other vaccines against the original strain and against the beta, delta, and omicron BA.1 variants (Figure 1 and Table S2). The geometric mean titer of anti-S1 increased from 277.1 binding antibody units (BAU) per milliliter at day 0 to 1875.1 BAU per milliliter at day 15 in the MVD614 group, from 206.8 to 2240.8 BAU per milliliter in the MVB.1.351 group, and from 253.6 to 2405.4 BAU per milliliter in the BNT162b2 group (Table S3). The MVB.1.351 vaccine also induced high levels of specific polyfunctional CD4+ type 1 helper T-cell response (Figs. S3 and S4). The reactogenicity profiles of the three booster vaccines did not differ among the trial groups (Table S4). Over the short term, heterologous boosting with the beta-adjuvanted MVB.1.351 vaccine resulted in a higher neutralizing-antibody response against the beta variant as well as against the original strain and the delta and omicron BA.1 variants than did the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 or the MVD614 formulation. The use of new vaccines that contain beta spike protein may be an interesting strategy for broader protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Safety and immunogenicity of seven COVID-19 vaccines as a third dose (booster) following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 or BNT162b2 in the UK (COV-BOOST): a blinded, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial

          Background Few data exist on the comparative safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccines given as a third (booster) dose. To generate data to optimise selection of booster vaccines, we investigated the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of seven different COVID-19 vaccines as a third dose after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca; hereafter referred to as ChAd) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNtech, hearafter referred to as BNT). Methods COV-BOOST is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial of third dose booster vaccination against COVID-19. Participants were aged older than 30 years, and were at least 70 days post two doses of ChAd or at least 84 days post two doses of BNT primary COVID-19 immunisation course, with no history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. 18 sites were split into three groups (A, B, and C). Within each site group (A, B, or C), participants were randomly assigned to an experimental vaccine or control. Group A received NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax; hereafter referred to as NVX), a half dose of NVX, ChAd, or quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) control (1:1:1:1). Group B received BNT, VLA2001 (Valneva; hereafter referred to as VLA), a half dose of VLA, Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen; hereafter referred to as Ad26) or MenACWY (1:1:1:1:1). Group C received mRNA1273 (Moderna; hereafter referred to as m1273), CVnCov (CureVac; hereafter referred to as CVn), a half dose of BNT, or MenACWY (1:1:1:1). Participants and all investigatory staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Coprimary outcomes were safety and reactogenicity and immunogenicity of anti-spike IgG measured by ELISA. The primary analysis for immunogenicity was on a modified intention-to-treat basis; safety and reactogenicity were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included assessment of viral neutralisation and cellular responses. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 73765130. Findings Between June 1 and June 30, 2021, 3498 people were screened. 2878 participants met eligibility criteria and received COVID-19 vaccine or control. The median ages of ChAd/ChAd-primed participants were 53 years (IQR 44–61) in the younger age group and 76 years (73–78) in the older age group. In the BNT/BNT-primed participants, the median ages were 51 years (41–59) in the younger age group and 78 years (75–82) in the older age group. In the ChAd/ChAD-primed group, 676 (46·7%) participants were female and 1380 (95·4%) were White, and in the BNT/BNT-primed group 770 (53·6%) participants were female and 1321 (91·9%) were White. Three vaccines showed overall increased reactogenicity: m1273 after ChAd/ChAd or BNT/BNT; and ChAd and Ad26 after BNT/BNT. For ChAd/ChAd-primed individuals, spike IgG geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between study vaccines and controls ranged from 1·8 (99% CI 1·5–2·3) in the half VLA group to 32·3 (24·8–42·0) in the m1273 group. GMRs for wild-type cellular responses compared with controls ranged from 1·1 (95% CI 0·7–1·6) for ChAd to 3·6 (2·4–5·5) for m1273. For BNT/BNT-primed individuals, spike IgG GMRs ranged from 1·3 (99% CI 1·0–1·5) in the half VLA group to 11·5 (9·4–14·1) in the m1273 group. GMRs for wild-type cellular responses compared with controls ranged from 1·0 (95% CI 0·7–1·6) for half VLA to 4·7 (3·1–7·1) for m1273. The results were similar between those aged 30–69 years and those aged 70 years and older. Fatigue and pain were the most common solicited local and systemic adverse events, experienced more in people aged 30–69 years than those aged 70 years or older. Serious adverse events were uncommon, similar in active vaccine and control groups. In total, there were 24 serious adverse events: five in the control group (two in control group A, three in control group B, and zero in control group C), two in Ad26, five in VLA, one in VLA-half, one in BNT, two in BNT-half, two in ChAd, one in CVn, two in NVX, two in NVX-half, and one in m1273. Interpretation All study vaccines boosted antibody and neutralising responses after ChAd/ChAd initial course and all except one after BNT/BNT, with no safety concerns. Substantial differences in humoral and cellular responses, and vaccine availability will influence policy choices for booster vaccination. Funding UK Vaccine Taskforce and National Institute for Health Research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Homologous and Heterologous Covid-19 Booster Vaccinations

            Abstract Background Although the three vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) that have received emergency use authorization in the United States are highly effective, breakthrough infections are occurring. Data are needed on the serial use of homologous boosters (same as the primary vaccine) and heterologous boosters (different from the primary vaccine) in fully vaccinated recipients. Methods In this phase 1–2, open-label clinical trial conducted at 10 sites in the United States, adults who had completed a Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier and had no reported history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection received a booster injection with one of three vaccines: mRNA-1273 (Moderna) at a dose of 100 μg, Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen) at a dose of 5×1010 virus particles, or BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) at a dose of 30 μg. The primary end points were safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity on trial days 15 and 29. Results Of the 458 participants who were enrolled in the trial, 154 received mRNA-1273, 150 received Ad26.COV2.S, and 153 received BNT162b2 as booster vaccines; 1 participant did not receive the assigned vaccine. Reactogenicity was similar to that reported for the primary series. More than half the recipients reported having injection-site pain, malaise, headache, or myalgia. For all combinations, antibody neutralizing titers against a SARS-CoV-2 D614G pseudovirus increased by a factor of 4 to 73, and binding titers increased by a factor of 5 to 55. Homologous boosters increased neutralizing antibody titers by a factor of 4 to 20, whereas heterologous boosters increased titers by a factor of 6 to 73. Spike-specific T-cell responses increased in all but the homologous Ad26.COV2.S-boosted subgroup. CD8+ T-cell levels were more durable in the Ad26.COV2.S-primed recipients, and heterologous boosting with the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine substantially increased spike-specific CD8+ T cells in the mRNA vaccine recipients. Conclusions Homologous and heterologous booster vaccines had an acceptable safety profile and were immunogenic in adults who had completed a primary Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; DMID 21-0012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04889209.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant mRNA vaccine boosters in healthy adults: an interim analysis

              The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) and variants of interest (VOIs) with decreased susceptibility to neutralization has generated interest in assessments of booster doses and variant-specific vaccines. Clinical trial participants who received a two-dose primary series of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA-1273 approximately 6 months earlier entered an open-label phase 2a study (NCT04405076) to evaluate the primary objectives of safety and immunogenicity of a single booster dose of mRNA-1273 or variant-modified mRNAs, including multivalent mRNA-1273.211. As the trial is currently ongoing, this exploratory interim analysis includes preliminary descriptive results only of four booster groups (n = 20 per group). Immediately before the booster dose, neutralizing antibodies against wild-type D614G virus had waned (P < 0.0001) relative to peak titers against wild-type D614G measured 1 month after the primary series, and neutralization titers against B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma) and B.1.617.2 (Delta) VOCs were either low or undetectable. Both the mRNA-1273 booster and variant-modified boosters were safe and well-tolerated. All boosters, including mRNA-1273, numerically increased neutralization titers against the wild-type D614G virus compared to peak titers against wild-type D614G measured 1 month after the primary series; significant increases were observed for mRNA-1273 and mRNA-1273.211 (P < 0.0001). In addition, all boosters increased neutralization titers against key VOCs and VOIs, including B.1.351, P.1. and B.1.617.2, that were statistically equivalent to peak titers measured after the primary vaccine series against wild-type D614G virus, with superior titers against some VOIs. This trial is ongoing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                N Engl J Med
                N Engl J Med
                nejm
                The New England Journal of Medicine
                Massachusetts Medical Society
                0028-4793
                1533-4406
                29 June 2022
                29 June 2022
                : NEJMc2206711
                Affiliations
                Université Paris Cité, Paris, France odile.launay@ 123456aphp.fr
                Hôpital St. Antoine, Paris, France
                Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
                Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
                University Hospital, Dijon, France
                Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
                Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
                Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Rennes, Rennes, France
                CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
                CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
                Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
                CHU de Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
                Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille, Marseille, France
                Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                CHU Lille, Lille, France
                Hôpital St. Antoine, Paris, France
                Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
                Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
                Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
                Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
                Hôpital St. Antoine, Paris, France
                Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
                Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
                Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0028-1837
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-117X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8092-8727
                Article
                NJ202206293870405
                10.1056/NEJMc2206711
                9258749
                35767474
                e9a55c30-ce50-4dd9-b4b2-f2ba1cbfeb7f
                Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use, except commercial resale, and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgment of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the Covid-19 pandemic or until revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, subject to existing copyright protections.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: French Ministries of Solidarity and Health and Research, FundRef ;
                Categories
                Correspondence
                Custom metadata
                2022-06-29T17:00:00-04:00
                2022
                06
                29
                17
                00
                00
                -04:00

                Comments

                Comment on this article