44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Telmisartan for treatment of Covid-19 patients: An open multicenter randomized clinical trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), such as telmisartan, have been postulated to treat Covid-19-induced lung inflammation.

          Methods

          This is a parallel-group, randomized, two-arm, open-label, adaptive, multicenter superiority trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants included patients from 18 years of age hospitalized with Covid-19 with 4 or fewer days since symptom onset enrolled at a university and a community hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Exclusion criteria included prior intensive care unit (ICU) admission and use of ARBs/angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors at randomization . Control arm received standard care alone and treatment arm telmisartan 80 mg twice daily for 14 days. Primary outcomes were C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma levels at day 5 and 8 after randomization. Secondary outcomes included time to discharge within 15 days, admission to ICU and death at 15- and 30-days. NCT04355936 (Completed).

          Findings

          A pragmatic decision to end the study before the third interim analysis was made on Oct. 30th due to sharp reduction in recruitment. A total of 162 patients were randomized. 158 patients enrolled between May 14 and October 30 2020, were included in the analysis, 80 in the standard care and 78 in the telmisartan added to standard care group. Baseline absolute CRP serum levels were 5.53 ± 6.19 mg/dL (95% CI 6.91 to 4.15, n = 80) and 9.04 ± 7.69 (95% CI 9.04 to 10.82, n = 74) in the standard care and telmisartan added to standard care groups, respectively. Day 5 control-group CRP levels were 6.06 ± 6.95 mg/dL (95% CI 7.79–4.35, n = 66) while telmisartan group were 3.83 ± 5.08 mg/dL (95% CI 5.08–2.59, n = 66, p = 0.038). Day 8 CRP levels were 6.30 ± 8.19 mg/dL (95% CI 8.79–3.81, n = 44) and 2.37 ± 3.47 mg/dL (95% CI 3.44–1.30, n = 43, p = 0.0098) in the control and telmisartan groups, respectively (all values expressed as mean ± SD). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that telmisartan-treated patients had a lower median time-to-discharge (control=15 days; telmisartan=9 days). Death by day 30 was reduced in the telmisartan-treated group (control 22.54%, 16/71; telmisartan 4.29%, 3/70 participants; p = 0.0023). Composite ICU, mechanical ventilation or death was reduced by telmisartan treatment at days 15 and 30. No adverse events were reported.

          Interpretation

          Our study suggests that the ARB telmisartan, a widely used antihypertensive drug, is safe and could reduce morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients infected with SARS -CoV-2 by anti-inflammatory effects. Further studies employing telmisartan are needed for confirmation of our results and to define its true therapeutic value as a tool against Covid-19.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus

          The recent emergence of Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV) puts the world on alert. 2019-nCoV is reminiscent of the SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002 to 2003. Our decade-long structural studies on the receptor recognition by SARS-CoV have identified key interactions between SARS-CoV spike protein and its host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which regulate both the cross-species and human-to-human transmissions of SARS-CoV. One of the goals of SARS-CoV research was to build an atomic-level iterative framework of virus-receptor interactions to facilitate epidemic surveillance, predict species-specific receptor usage, and identify potential animal hosts and animal models of viruses. Based on the sequence of 2019-nCoV spike protein, we apply this predictive framework to provide novel insights into the receptor usage and likely host range of 2019-nCoV. This study provides a robust test of this reiterative framework, providing the basic, translational, and public health research communities with predictive insights that may help study and battle this novel 2019-nCoV.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury

            The outbreak of the 2019-nCoV infection began in December 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei province, and rapidly spread to many provinces in China as well as other countries. Here we report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics, as well as potential biomarkers for predicting disease severity in 2019-nCoV-infected patients in Shenzhen, China. All 12 cases of the 2019-nCoV-infected patients developed pneumonia and half of them developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The most common laboratory abnormalities were hypoalbuminemia, lymphopenia, decreased percentage of lymphocytes (LYM) and neutrophils (NEU), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and decreased CD8 count. The viral load of 2019-nCoV detected from patient respiratory tracts was positively linked to lung disease severity. ALB, LYM, LYM (%), LDH, NEU (%), and CRP were highly correlated to the acute lung injury. Age, viral load, lung injury score, and blood biochemistry indexes, albumin (ALB), CRP, LDH, LYM (%), LYM, and NEU (%), may be predictors of disease severity. Moreover, the Angiotensin II level in the plasma sample from 2019-nCoV infected patients was markedly elevated and linearly associated to viral load and lung injury. Our results suggest a number of potential diagnosis biomarkers and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) drugs for potential repurposing treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.1007/s11427-020-1643-8 and is accessible for authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission

              Anecdotal evidence suggests that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, exhibits differences in morbidity and mortality between sexes. Here, we present a meta-analysis of 3,111,714 reported global cases to demonstrate that, whilst there is no difference in the proportion of males and females with confirmed COVID-19, male patients have almost three times the odds of requiring intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06, 3.92) and higher odds of death (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.31, 1.47) compared to females. With few exceptions, the sex bias observed in COVID-19 is a worldwide phenomenon. An appreciation of how sex is influencing COVID-19 outcomes will have important implications for clinical management and mitigation strategies for this disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                2589-5370
                18 June 2021
                July 2021
                18 June 2021
                : 37
                : 100962
                Affiliations
                [a ]Laboratorio de Hipertensión, División de Cardiología, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [b ]Segunda Cátedra de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [c ]Asociación Argentina de Medicamentos, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [d ]Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Calafate SAMIC, Argentina
                [e ]División de Cardiología, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [f ]Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [g ]Servicio de Medicina Familiar, Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Calafate SAMIC, Argentina
                [h ]Servicio de Electrofisiología Cardíaca, Arritmias y Marcapasos, Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [i ]Departamento de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [j ]Laboratorio de Terapia Intensiva y Urgencias, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [k ]División de Cardiología, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [l ]Sección de Tecnología Educativa e Informática Médica, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [m ]Servicio de Guardia, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [n ]Laboratorio Central, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [o ]Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [p ]Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [q ]Sociedad Argentina de Farmacología Clínica, Asociación Médica Argentina, Argentina
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondig author at: Sociedad Argentina de Farmacología Clínica, Asociación Médica Argentina, Av. Santa Fe 1171, C1059 ABF, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                S2589-5370(21)00242-X 100962
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100962
                8225700
                34189447
                e80a8118-ec61-4f6b-9478-7a38311d879e
                © 2021 The Author(s)

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 28 January 2021
                : 9 May 2021
                : 26 May 2021
                Categories
                Research Paper

                covid-19,arb,telmisartan,ace2
                covid-19, arb, telmisartan, ace2

                Comments

                Comment on this article