5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global COVID-19 Vaccine Inequity: Failures in the First Year of Distribution and Potential Solutions for the Future

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within the first year of distribution of vaccines against COVID-19, high-income countries (HICs) have achieved vaccination rates of 75-80%, whilst low-income countries (LICs) vaccinated <10%. This disparity in access has been one of the greatest failures of international cooperation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Global COVID-19 vaccine inequity affects us all, with ongoing risk of new variants emerging until global herd immunity is strengthened. The current model of global vaccine distribution is based on financial competition for limited vaccine supplies, resulting in HICs getting first access to vaccines, with LICs being forced to rely on voluntary donations through schemes like COVAX. Pharmaceutical companies own the intellectual property (IP) rights for COVID-19 vaccines, allowing them to control manufacturing, distribution, and pricing. However, the pharmaceutical industry did not develop these vaccines alone, with billions of dollars of public funding being instrumental in their discovery and development. Solutions to enable global equitable access already exist. The next step in scale up of manufacture and distribution worldwide is equitable knowledge sharing and technology transfer. The World Health Organization centralized technology transfer hub would facilitate international cooperation. Investments made into developing this infrastructure benefit the COVID-19 response whilst promoting future pandemic preparedness. Whilst globally there is majority support for waivers of IP to facilitate this next step, key opponents blocking this move include the UK and other European countries which host large domestic pharmaceutical industries. A nationalistic approach is not effective during a global pandemic. International cooperation is essential to achieve global goals against COVID-19.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations

          An effective rollout of vaccinations against COVID-19 offers the most promising prospect of bringing the pandemic to an end. We present the Our World in Data COVID-19 vaccination dataset, a global public dataset that tracks the scale and rate of the vaccine rollout across the world. This dataset is updated regularly and includes data on the total number of vaccinations administered, first and second doses administered, daily vaccination rates and population-adjusted coverage for all countries for which data are available (169 countries as of 7 April 2021). It will be maintained as the global vaccination campaign continues to progress. This resource aids policymakers and researchers in understanding the rate of current and potential vaccine rollout; the interactions with non-vaccination policy responses; the potential impact of vaccinations on pandemic outcomes such as transmission, morbidity and mortality; and global inequalities in vaccine access.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The COVID-19 Pandemic and the $16 Trillion Virus

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              COVID’s mental-health toll: how scientists are tracking a surge in depression

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                07 March 2022
                2022
                07 March 2022
                : 10
                : 821117
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom
                [2] 2MetaVirology Ltd. , London, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [4] 4Department for Translational Medicine, Liverpool University , Liverpool, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Marisa Gilles, Western Australian Center for Rural Health (WACRH), Australia

                Reviewed by: Khan Sharun, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), India

                *Correspondence: Victoria Pilkington v.pilkington@ 123456nhs.net

                This article was submitted to Public Health Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                †ORCID: Victoria Pilkington orcid.org/0000-0002-5920-3414

                Sarai Mirjam Keestra orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-0977

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2022.821117
                8936388
                35321196
                e544b913-ab63-43b8-af0a-3f5556f28c60
                Copyright © 2022 Pilkington, Keestra and Hill.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 November 2021
                : 31 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 56, Pages: 8, Words: 5203
                Categories
                Public Health
                Perspective

                manufacturing—r&d interface,pricing,vaccines,covid-19,inequality

                Comments

                Comment on this article